Message boards :
Number crunching :
whole serie of data blocks failing with SoG
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 25 Sep 00 Posts: 190 Credit: 23,498,825 RAC: 9 ![]() |
Trying the new drivers now. SOG seem to be running correctly now. Will test longer. |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
Trying the new drivers now. You need to find some tasks that are the corner case for the failures. The tasks that failed were Arecibo VHARs of AR=2.7. So you need to wait until a new Arecibo file gets loaded and hope for some VHAR tasks. Or wait for some of the inevitable resends from those early failures. Or use the card and drivers on some of the other projects that had failures too like Einstein. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
rob smith ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22775 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 ![]() ![]() |
Those VHAR task look like data that was collected while the telescope was sweeping from one target to another, so probably not a lot of use in them anyway. Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
Jeff Send message Joined: 8 May 99 Posts: 5 Credit: 98,361,983 RAC: 150 ![]() ![]() |
No mention of it being fixed in the release notes, but there's also no mention of it in the existing issues notes either.Version 436.30 is out today. I wonder if nVidia fixed things....Be the guinea pig and report back. Patiently awaiting the guinea pig report. Definitely not wanting to try downgrading those drivers yet again. 436.02 started the issue, 436.15 was no better. Not holding my breath with 436.30. Until I hear that it is finally working properly for CUDA processing I am sticking with 431.60. |
![]() Send message Joined: 25 Sep 00 Posts: 190 Credit: 23,498,825 RAC: 9 ![]() |
Still getting errors with nVidia driver 436.30 |
jdzukley ![]() Send message Joined: 6 Apr 11 Posts: 19 Credit: 26,357,809 RAC: 74 ![]() ![]() |
I am getting errors too, please reference computer # 7433824 and look at the tasks that errored out. I have 1070 cards, and while I aborted 3 tasks that have not advanced more than 0.6% after many minutes - I had yet to see any task take more than 10 minutes to complete. There are other tasks in the error list that have run times over 4000 seconds before they errored out. All are Arecibo tasks from different dates, and but many other tasks from the same date group have finish successfully... I look foreword to any and all suggestions. jdzukley |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
I am getting errors too, please reference computer # 7433824 and look at the tasks that errored out. I have 1070 cards, and while I aborted 3 tasks that have not advanced more than 0.6% after many minutes - I had yet to see any task take more than 10 minutes to complete. There are other tasks in the error list that have run times over 4000 seconds before they errored out. All are Arecibo tasks from different dates, and but many other tasks from the same date group have finish successfully... Depends on whether the Arecibo tasks have a high angle range. Those tasks will error out on the 436 drivers. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.