Questions and Answers :
Windows :
Validation Inconclusive
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Frank Peiffer Send message Joined: 22 Jul 09 Posts: 6 Credit: 2,117,826 RAC: 0 |
Hi all, I have noticed that around 10% of my results are listed as "validation inconclusive". Can anyone explain why this is or why this is different to "validation pending"? The inclusive results usually resolve and I rarely have results that are classed as errors. Thanks in advance for your advice. Frank |
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22645 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
"Validation Pending" is the first stage a returned task goes, it may only be there a feew seconds or many weeks or months.... When the validation of a work unit (the two copies of it having been completed and returned) there are three possible outcomes: "Valid" - both sets of returned data agree "Invalid" - the result returned is blatanly wrong "Validation Inconclusive" - the two results are nearly the same so the data is passed on to a third person to run it and act as arbiter. Some applications are believed to produce higher than normal "Inconclusives" on some systems, but behave quite acceptably on others. A quick glance at your computer I see you are running both a GTX1080 and the processor internal Intel GPU. While it is possble to get both to work quite happily it is more common the running the Intel GPU in such cases will give you more trouble than it is worth due to issues wiht shared resources between the CPU and th Igpu - I would stop the Intel GPU getting work and see what happens. (There is an option on your "account" web page to turn data off for the Intel GPU) Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
I checked his system as well, and saw it's predominantly his wingperson who has the inconclusives and normally the errors from it. All the tasks I checked were done on Nvidia GPU. |
Frank Peiffer Send message Joined: 22 Jul 09 Posts: 6 Credit: 2,117,826 RAC: 0 |
Thank you guys. I appreciate the help. Cheers. |
Frank Peiffer Send message Joined: 22 Jul 09 Posts: 6 Credit: 2,117,826 RAC: 0 |
Thanks again guys. I took your advice. Issue resolved. |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.