Questions and Answers :
Windows :
Time to process WUs
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Pascal, K G ![]() Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2343 Credit: 150,491 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Just got some WUs and the 1st two units only took 1m 19s and 57s to process, my question is do we get WUs that small or is something SNAFUed or FUBARed, I had one other unit that processed in about 3m a couple of days ago...... Now some they do and some they don't And some you just can't tell And some they will and some they won't With some it's just as well Goodbye Stranger Supertramp |
Heffed Send message Joined: 19 Mar 02 Posts: 1856 Credit: 40,736 RAC: 0 ![]() |
If is said the WU was successful and gave you pending credit, I think looking at the stderr for that WU, you will see the -9 overflow informational message. This is cool. It just means the WU has too much relevant data to process. The resulting output file would be too large. Also known as a "noisy" WU. :-) |
Pascal, K G ![]() Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2343 Credit: 150,491 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> If is said the WU was successful and gave you pending credit, I think looking > at the stderr for that WU, you will see the -9 overflow informational > message. > > This is cool. It just means the WU has too much relevant data to process. The > resulting output file would be too large. Also known as a "noisy" WU. :-) > Ty for your answer, that clears it up..... ![]() Now some they do and some they don't And some you just can't tell And some they will and some they won't With some it's just as well Goodbye Stranger Supertramp |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.