I was pondering over something yesterday evening.

We have the unattainability of zero in the law of thermodynamics. If there would be a theory of everything, wouldn't there have to be a general rule that speaks for quantum physics as well as for relativity. What I mean is, the scenario of the big crunch wouldn't exist in that case because there would be an infinite infiniteness. No beginning is possible as well as no end.

If the universe would end in a big rip or big freeze, what would happen with the dark energy? We all know dark energy as a hypothetical force that makes the universe expand at an accelerated rate. If all matter would have died, would the universe still expand because of that force? This also brings me back to the concept of time. Time never had a beginning, nor will it have an end, in my opinion.

In our universe time did had a beginning.
The Big Bang theory says that both time and space was created in the "bang".
It's called the space-time fabric and you cannot separate them.
That universe will end seems impossible to me.
Only that all matter disappears, even blackholes, and all the energy is very dilluted.
I think that our universe will expand for ever and time will never stop.

I was pondering over something yesterday evening.

We have the unattainability of zero in the law of thermodynamics. If there would be a theory of everything, wouldn't there have to be a general rule that speaks for quantum physics as well as for relativity. What I mean is, the scenario of the big crunch wouldn't exist in that case because there would be an infinite infiniteness. No beginning is possible as well as no end.

If the universe would end in a big rip or big freeze, what would happen with the dark energy? We all know dark energy as a hypothetical force that makes the universe expand at an accelerated rate. If all matter would have died, would the universe still expand because of that force? This also brings me back to the concept of time. Time never had a beginning, nor will it have an end, in my opinion.

In our universe time did had a beginning.
The Big Bang theory says that both time and space was created in the "bang".
It's called the space-time fabric and you cannot separate them.
That universe will end seems impossible to me.
Only that all matter disappears, even blackholes, and all the energy is very dilluted.
I think that our universe will expand for ever and time will never stop.

So the unattainability of zero doesn't affect the concept of time? I believe time and space already existed before the big bang as well (cfr. multiverse theories).

It seems to me the Big Bang theory contradicts that particular law of Thermodynamics.

I was pondering over something yesterday evening.

We have the unattainability of zero in the law of thermodynamics. If there would be a theory of everything, wouldn't there have to be a general rule that speaks for quantum physics as well as for relativity. What I mean is, the scenario of the big crunch wouldn't exist in that case because there would be an infinite infiniteness. No beginning is possible as well as no end.

If the universe would end in a big rip or big freeze, what would happen with the dark energy? We all know dark energy as a hypothetical force that makes the universe expand at an accelerated rate. If all matter would have died, would the universe still expand because of that force? This also brings me back to the concept of time. Time never had a beginning, nor will it have an end, in my opinion.

In our universe time did had a beginning.
The Big Bang theory says that both time and space was created in the "bang".
It's called the space-time fabric and you cannot separate them.
That universe will end seems impossible to me.
Only that all matter disappears, even blackholes, and all the energy is very dilluted.
I think that our universe will expand for ever and time will never stop.

So the unattainability of zero doesn't affect the concept of time? I believe time and space already existed before the big bang as well (cfr. multiverse theories).

It seems to me the Big Bang theory contradicts that particular law of Thermodynamics.

But our physic laws was "created" as well in the big bang.
Were there any laws before the big bang?

No, they just built a gate with 2 qubits. You need billions of them to make a computer.
Tullio

My first computer had about 100 Kbits back in the 80's:)
A quantum computer needs a lot less of qubits than a classical one with bits to compute special algorithms.
A quantum computer with 100 Kqubits would be a quantum leap.

And The End of Moore's Law is soon here for classical computers...

No, they just built a gate with 2 qubits. You need billions of them to make a computer.
Tullio

My first computer had about 100 Kbits back in the 80's:)
A quantum computer needs a lot less of qubits than a classical one with bits to compute special algorithms.
A quantum computer with 100 Kqubits would be a quantum leap.

And The End of Moore's Law is soon here for classical computers...

again, confusing gates/transistors with memory (Kb or KB)... :/

I was pondering over something yesterday evening.

We have the unattainability of zero in the law of thermodynamics. If there would be a theory of everything, wouldn't there have to be a general rule that speaks for quantum physics as well as for relativity. What I mean is, the scenario of the big crunch wouldn't exist in that case because there would be an infinite infiniteness. No beginning is possible as well as no end.

If the universe would end in a big rip or big freeze, what would happen with the dark energy? We all know dark energy as a hypothetical force that makes the universe expand at an accelerated rate. If all matter would have died, would the universe still expand because of that force? This also brings me back to the concept of time. Time never had a beginning, nor will it have an end, in my opinion.

In our universe time did had a beginning.
The Big Bang theory says that both time and space was created in the "bang".
It's called the space-time fabric and you cannot separate them.
That universe will end seems impossible to me.
Only that all matter disappears, even blackholes, and all the energy is very dilluted.
I think that our universe will expand for ever and time will never stop.

So the unattainability of zero doesn't affect the concept of time? I believe time and space already existed before the big bang as well (cfr. multiverse theories).

It seems to me the Big Bang theory contradicts that particular law of Thermodynamics.

But our physic laws was "created" as well in the big bang.
Were there any laws before the big bang?

Presumably, from other species, I would like to think. They would answer to completely different laws of physics, is what I think as well.

I was pondering over something yesterday evening.

We have the unattainability of zero in the law of thermodynamics. If there would be a theory of everything, wouldn't there have to be a general rule that speaks for quantum physics as well as for relativity. What I mean is, the scenario of the big crunch wouldn't exist in that case because there would be an infinite infiniteness. No beginning is possible as well as no end.

If the universe would end in a big rip or big freeze, what would happen with the dark energy? We all know dark energy as a hypothetical force that makes the universe expand at an accelerated rate. If all matter would have died, would the universe still expand because of that force? This also brings me back to the concept of time. Time never had a beginning, nor will it have an end, in my opinion.

In our universe time did had a beginning.
The Big Bang theory says that both time and space was created in the "bang".
It's called the space-time fabric and you cannot separate them.
That universe will end seems impossible to me.
Only that all matter disappears, even blackholes, and all the energy is very dilluted.
I think that our universe will expand for ever and time will never stop.

So the unattainability of zero doesn't affect the concept of time? I believe time and space already existed before the big bang as well (cfr. multiverse theories).

It seems to me the Big Bang theory contradicts that particular law of Thermodynamics.

But our physic laws was "created" as well in the big bang.
Were there any laws before the big bang?

Presumably, from other species, I would like to think. They would answer to completely different laws of physics, is what I think as well.

Now I get a headache:)
On quantum scales, there are many second laws of thermodynamics!
http://phys.org/news/2015-02-quantum-scales-laws-thermodynamics.html

Professor Oppenheim added: "While a quantum house will get messier rather than tidier, like a normal house, our research shows that the ways in which it can get messier are constrained by a range of extra laws. Stranger still, the way these second laws interact with each other can even make it look like the traditional second law has been violated. For instance, a small system can spontaneously become more ordered when it interacts with another system which barely seems to change. That means some rooms in the quantum house may spontaneously become much tidier, while others only become messier but only imperceptibly."

So the unattainability of zero doesn't affect the concept of time? I believe time and space already existed before the big bang as well (cfr. multiverse theories).

Los Angeles Times | October 14, 2015 | 11:57 AM
A well known UC Berkeley astronomer facing sexual harassment allegations has stepped down, a senior administration source at the university said today.

The school has faced growing criticism in recent days for its handling of an investigation into professor Geoffrey Marcy. The investigation, sparked by a series of complaints, found that he had sexually harassed students over a nine-year period.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

Where is the Planck constant being found here?

Thanks for that, janneseti.
But noticing that the image is quite to the left in the picture.
At least when being visible on my screen.
It almost is cut off at the starting point.
Looking up the Wikipedia article, I actually missed both the line as well as the same figure when reading yesterday.
That became the reason for my confusion.

A TEAM of scientists have made what may turn out to be the most important discovery in HISTORY – how the universe came into being from nothing.

The colossal question has troubled religions, philosophers and scientists since the dawn of time but now a Canadian team believe they have solved the riddle.

And the findings are so conclusive they even challenge the need for religion, or at least an omnipotent creator – the basis of all world religions.
...
Prof Mir used some mind-boggling mathematics and two recent theories:

• The Minimum Length Scale – a measurement so infinitesimally small that space and time cease to exist.

• Doubly Special Relativity – which takes advantage of the massive energies available just after the birth of the universe.

Under Inflation Theory the tiny energies and lifespan of the virtual particle become infinitely magnified, resulting in our 13.8 Billion-year-old universe.

Just to make things more complicated Dr Mir says we have been looking at the question ‘how did the universe come from nothing?’ all wrong.

According to the extraordinary findings, the question is irrelevant because the universe STILL is nothing.

Dr Mir said: “Something did not come from nothing. The universe still is nothing, it’s just more elegantly ordered nothing.”

He added that the negative gravitational energy of the universe and the positive matter energy of the universe basically balanced out and created a zero sum.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/612340/Origin-of-the-universe-riddle-solved-by-Canadian-physicists-and-er-it-wasn-t-God

A TEAM of scientists have made what may turn out to be the most important discovery in HISTORY – how the universe came into being from nothing.
The colossal question has troubled religions, philosophers and scientists since the dawn of time but now a Canadian team believe they have solved the riddle.
And the findings are so conclusive they even challenge the need for religion, or at least an omnipotent creator – the basis of all world religions.
Prof Mir used some mind-boggling mathematics and two recent theories:
• The Minimum Length Scale – a measurement so infinitesimally small that space and time cease to exist.
• Doubly Special Relativity – which takes advantage of the massive energies available just after the birth of the universe.
Under Inflation Theory the tiny energies and lifespan of the virtual particle become infinitely magnified, resulting in our 13.8 Billion-year-old universe.
Just to make things more complicated Dr Mir says we have been looking at the question ‘how did the universe come from nothing?’ all wrong.
According to the extraordinary findings, the question is irrelevant because the universe STILL is nothing.
Dr Mir said: “Something did not come from nothing. The universe still is nothing, it’s just more elegantly ordered nothing.”
He added that the negative gravitational energy of the universe and the positive matter energy of the universe basically balanced out and created a zero sum.

Dr Mir said: “Something did not come from nothing. The universe still is nothing, it’s just more elegantly ordered nothing.”