Message boards :
Science (non-SETI) :
How do you measure time in space?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 . . . 10 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Batter Up ![]() Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I think would pretty hard if you can't see both sides of it to determine the age over all. some say 13.7 billion years and others vary OK but any comments on my math? ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34060 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 ![]() ![]() |
I think would pretty hard if you can't see both sides of it to determine the age over all. some say 13.7 billion years and others vary No rOZZ Music Pictures |
Caleb Send message Joined: 14 May 14 Posts: 7 Credit: 17,040 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I think would pretty hard if you can't see both sides of it to determine the age over all. some say 13.7 billion years and others vary This is beyond me but here is a link if you can follow the math. It's a bit more complicated than 13.7 + 13.7 |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I think would pretty hard if you can't see both sides of it to determine the age over all. some say 13.7 billion years and others vary The speed of light rule only applies to objects with mass as they move through space. Its not the objects themselves that are moving at the speed of light, the the distance between them that is expanding at faster than the speed of light. The fabric of space-time does not have to follow the rule postulated by Einstein's theory of special relativity. Reality Internet Personality |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I think would pretty hard if you can't see both sides of it to determine the age over all. some say 13.7 billion years and others vary You link is not working :( Reality Internet Personality |
Caleb Send message Joined: 14 May 14 Posts: 7 Credit: 17,040 RAC: 0 ![]() |
You link is not working :( fixed! ty. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34060 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 7 May 12 Posts: 8022 Credit: 4,237,757 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Its not the objects themselves that are moving at the speed of light, it is the distance between them that is expanding at faster than the speed of light So does this mean one is red shift and the other blue? better pick up a six pack before leaving :)) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 7 May 12 Posts: 8022 Credit: 4,237,757 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Its not the objects themselves that are moving at the speed of light, it is the distance between them that is expanding at faster than the speed of light Then neither would see each other by rights. Only at the beginning. |
Batter Up ![]() Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0 ![]() |
By my math if both object were moving away from each other at the speed of light at some point they had to travel faster than light. New math; starting as a singularity two objects move away from each other at the speed of light for 13.7 billion years, double the speed of light away only from each other yet they are more than 24.7 billion light years apart. 13.7 x 2 = 24.7 not 98 as is observed. Numbers not exact but close enough for this question. Then neither would see each other by rights. Only at the beginning. All objects have slowed considerably. I'm wondering how in the past things went faster than light. ![]() |
Caleb Send message Joined: 14 May 14 Posts: 7 Credit: 17,040 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Actually I'm under the impression that the Universe is accelerating it's expansion. |
Batter Up ![]() Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Actually I'm under the impression that the Universe is accelerating it's expansion. Q. Did the Universe start with a singularity? Q. How old is the Universe? Q. What is the distance between the two farthest points in the known Universe? ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34060 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 ![]() ![]() |
Actually I'm under the impression that the Universe is accelerating it's expansion. You forgot one=> Q. Does the Universe have a center? rOZZ Music Pictures |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34060 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 ![]() ![]() |
Actually I'm under the impression that the Universe is accelerating it's expansion. We all know the Universe is 13.7 billion years old. The distance from the big bang till here is 13.7 billion lightyears, if the Universe started with a big bang that is and as only spacetime exists in the Universe. With the last question I've added I'm wondering, if the Universe started with a big bang, would the singularity be the center of the Universe? In that case the answer to question 3 could be 27.4 billion lightyears. rOZZ Music Pictures |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34060 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 ![]() ![]() |
Q. What is the distance between the two farthest points in the known Universe? Oops, didn't take the expansion into account:( If that were truly the answer, that would be great but it's much too simple... Apparently not Centre So what the article says is that everyone and everything is the center of the Universe, interesting... rOZZ Music Pictures |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 7 May 12 Posts: 8022 Credit: 4,237,757 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Thanks Chris and Julie I couldn't have said it better. :) Cheers everybody Life is short so don't sip Beer speaks, people mumble |
anniet ![]() Send message Joined: 2 Feb 14 Posts: 7105 Credit: 1,577,368 RAC: 75 ![]() ![]() |
Thanks Chris and Julie I couldn't have said it better. :) :) So - being in the middle (as I am :)) with everything revolving around ME (SNORT - warning; spell of megalomania approaching :)) makes it so much harder to see everything around the edges :) Could that mean we only think the universe is as old as it is (approximately 13.7 billion years) because the light from most if not all of the "missing matter" simply hasn't reached us yet? Must go now - have a world to rule :) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Thanks Chris and Julie I couldn't have said it better. :) The age of the universe was first worked out by calculating the rate of expansion and extrapolating back in time to how long ago everything was all in the same spot. Reality Internet Personality |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34060 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 ![]() ![]() |
One needs a bit of peripheral vision you see Annie. We can't define the size of the Universe, because it's expanding! Good point Chris! rOZZ Music Pictures |
anniet ![]() Send message Joined: 2 Feb 14 Posts: 7105 Credit: 1,577,368 RAC: 75 ![]() ![]() |
Hang on a minute! Are you all saying things are different from the middle of your universes? :) I think I need a lie down now... :) *weakly - from chaise longue* but what if there was a lot of matter around the bit that went boom... when it went boom and expanded into what we can see... propelling or pushing everything else outwards so that we can't see it... yet... till it's light reaches us? :) edit: I'm not sure that question made sense once it left my head... |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.