Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 339 · 340 · 341 · 342

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7232
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2141066 - Posted: 22 Sep 2024, 2:25:34 UTC
Last modified: 22 Sep 2024, 2:29:18 UTC

In which way could everything be self-explained for only being told?

Not that it should matter for only a difference but only taught instead.

Such a thing could become a description but also a definition when still only for meaning.

But also taught for only mentioned when still a part so next it could be such a thing for Chaos instead.

I choose to make it nature first for only coming and aliens thereafter so next it becomes "hitherto" for such a thing.

Just left should be only remaining so next it should be explained for still only its part.

Only that I could compare for a difference and next it also should be such a thing for still only the aliens I could make.

But next my thoughts could be premeditated when still only thinking and next I could be using my Mind but also could be a purpose.

Such a thing as a function should be only part of working when still only a difference for the thing we could be making but still not any aliens instead.
ID: 2141066 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7232
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2141067 - Posted: 22 Sep 2024, 2:31:52 UTC
Last modified: 22 Sep 2024, 2:51:56 UTC

In a blink of a second and everything could be created but also fall apart.

Just wisdom and it could be "troll in a box" for not any singular part instead.

Only that I proved for making it extraterrestrials instead but also should be for the knowledge we could have.

Purpose should be nature for only implicit it so here another thing for other meaning also becomes a difference for not any other part it should be instead.

But only I could prove and next be for the difference we could make it Certainty for such meaning.

Versus another for only compared and it should be a ... sentence instead but also shortened.

But only it should be for not any resemble and next being part of another thing instead.

Could I fail and also nature and end up with an Equation instead.

Just slip my throat for only "when" and it becomes a Creator instead.
ID: 2141067 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7232
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2141068 - Posted: 22 Sep 2024, 2:56:37 UTC
Last modified: 22 Sep 2024, 3:07:12 UTC

Just Proof could be failing when also everything failing so next also asking if a Creator also could be doing such a thing.

But next only my stupidity instead so rather thinking instead.

Only becoming noncholance for not any certain thing compared when it could be a difference, or rather irrespective instead.

So next each thing for only meant and becoming infinity versus extraterrestrials instead.

Here such a thing could become a level for only place but also ... attained.

Situated could be still located but next also position in space.

Could I be wrong for only failing and it should be a Creator before any extraterrestrials instead.
ID: 2141068 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7232
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2141069 - Posted: 22 Sep 2024, 3:09:22 UTC
Last modified: 22 Sep 2024, 3:15:09 UTC

Hmm, Causality for not any degree but also aliens for a level instead.

Such a thing could become the Kardashev scale but next we also define levels for such a thing.

Only as a result for an Equation made and the next thing it becomes.

I guess you still have to analyze for only getting the result in front of you, but that part of it became Certainty.
ID: 2141069 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7232
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2141254 - Posted: 26 Sep 2024, 2:40:30 UTC
Last modified: 26 Sep 2024, 2:41:23 UTC

Not visiting you for a while but hmm become wrong.

So only for that of pros and cons ... but next it should be aliens instead.

Or rather I could include for everything so next it becomes for only a part but also for same context.

Here I thought infinity could be for not any end but also everything in between.

Such a thing becomes for an excuse but also forsaking the opposite way for only the meaning it could be.

But in such a way it also became a nature included for also set and also working.

So next it could be relative for meaning and the same thing observed regardless of position or where you may be.

But also for different parts existing so next it becomes hidden when intermediate or in between.

Such a thing as occult should not be any hidden when only difference for word.

Anyway, but I wrote such a thing before or I tried but here sitting with four beers left.

Patience could be thin but also I could be grown up for still believing in UFO's.
ID: 2141254 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7232
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2141255 - Posted: 26 Sep 2024, 2:43:42 UTC
Last modified: 26 Sep 2024, 3:02:33 UTC

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind

But also wrote such a thing at PrimeGrid for not any process instead and could be questioning a failing nature for not any failing Creator instead.

Those objects we could see or observe should be still only satellites for not any human instead.

No need to question anything which should be meant for own meaning, but next only short for each end.

Everything should be in between for only a part but also Logic for such meaning. but you never heard about a new Equation I made which should be C --> I.

Just regardless for such a meaning and also it becomes and please tell me how a Type III civilization could control its own galaxy when we are still not able to prove.

Or be in charge instead so next it also could be handling, but next also dealt with when using the hands.

Here I could see a common ancestor for a Creator when not any aliens for a part instead.

Becoming part here at first when I forgot the other word, but also that probable should be everything.
ID: 2141255 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 339 · 340 · 341 · 342

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.