Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 337 · 338 · 339 · 340 · 341 · 342 · 343 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2138828 - Posted: 27 Jul 2024, 18:39:21 UTC
Last modified: 27 Jul 2024, 18:47:32 UTC

I have to write this before getting to late, otherwise it becomes only forgotten again.

So welcome to the UFO club or perhaps UFOMIND instead and next you are supposed to prove science for not running outside because next only Benjamin Franklin and he was
proving lightning instead for not any aliens instead for that of subject.

Anyway, just written in a hurry at first so needs an edit but also tic-tac and has to write it down first but also the coffee.

Just science for a meaning and it also becomes proven for meaning but next also subject at hand for only knowing.

Just a difference for meaning is also science for meaning so next it could be running hand in hand for just only close.

Could we look at nature for a meaning also science for a meaning and we still have to prove for only subject but next also at hand.

Just difference could be close so next also close for a meaning when together so next it could be held.

Just ask me for a meaning and it also could be meant for not any always when it also could be such meaning but still only proving for the subject which could be at hand.

Just a circle is round for also a circle so next also for shape when it should not be any oval or elliptical for only a cylinder so next we take it for granted only when visible for also appearance.

But only that objects could be meant for a difference when also resembling so next it became part of a meaning for still only resembling when it also could be another.

But also that such a thing could be interpreted and next for still the meaning it perhaps could be so next only a lesson taught (oh pun).

So next I also thought it could be a UFO when still visible but also a cylinder when still only round because that should be appearance but also looking.

Kind of visual and it became only resemblance but next only the thing which should be for a meaning and not another because that could be...

But next also looking when you could see and next you could be predetermined (or preconceived) when still not any time but only the thing it was meant for.

Here I never gave a thought of what it could be for only resembling except that it could also be another thing of importance and next coming from another place.

Different contexts are still for different meanings when also subjects for the same so here it did not become any lesson instead but also you could be fooled.

But next only a template here for also a draft and someone else have to finish it for me, except that it became a huge craft.

Yes, becoming wrong but has to be written first for only stated.
ID: 2138828 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2138829 - Posted: 27 Jul 2024, 18:54:17 UTC
Last modified: 27 Jul 2024, 19:07:33 UTC

Just a written book for nature and it becomes a template but also cohesion so next the previous became a little long.

But also coherence when still cohesion but here I did not make it to fit above.

Just a start for a beginning and it also could be an end for only finish but next we only thought it could be angels when also visible.

Such a thing is still only a part when only visible but also becomes for another thing which should be still for meaning but next only believed.

And for that nature becomes a setup for not any silence instead but also we could look at natural phenomena.

But here it should not have been any lesson taught twice but only implicit instead.
ID: 2138829 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2138830 - Posted: 27 Jul 2024, 19:26:06 UTC
Last modified: 27 Jul 2024, 19:46:09 UTC

And here nature could be only a tic-tac for not any Messenger so next it was also predetermined for not any preconceived because that becomes believed for only a part.

Lost the original meaning again and should be back on track but just give it a name instead and it also becomes created for nature only working.

So here not any equal for only resembling instead but also it could be pretending.

And therefore not any pun in the previous and apologize for that but also "We are the world for just only a song".

Or perhaps I confused for only Benjamin Franklin instead but next it was a meaning which could be asked for.

But also "All the birds" when becoming confused but here left astray or maybe that just pretending became relative instead.

Just all people could have same meaning but next only explained.

But here Einstein made it only an Equation for nature when it could be other Laws instead.
ID: 2138830 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2138984 - Posted: 1 Aug 2024, 0:27:36 UTC
Last modified: 1 Aug 2024, 0:48:08 UTC

Please hide it because lines became too long so apologies.

If it could be also it could be resembling but more to be quantized here instead.

Just a difference could be found but next quantized for a different meaning instead and still another project.

Just tell me I could be a liar for not any proving and perhaps also mentioned.

Or rather it became such a thing for that of multiverses for not any other thing here instead.

Anyway, so could Quantification get at us for only good and not any sacrifice here instead?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantification

Apologies, for just having the beer right now, but just get rid of it and it becomes a Saint.

Not linking but also that quantizing could fail, but also experiencing more problems with my mouse.

Just leave it out for another thing so here it became a nature existing instead.
ID: 2138984 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2138989 - Posted: 1 Aug 2024, 0:50:37 UTC
Last modified: 1 Aug 2024, 0:58:44 UTC

Resembling for only a part for a difference and it could also be quantified and next for UFO's or aliens.

Maybe that became only nature for a difference so here we could also quantize for a different part.

Or perhaps that became only resemble here instead, I do not know.

Just subject for also matter should not but also a predicate, or rather only an Object for Philosophy.
ID: 2138989 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139291 - Posted: 9 Aug 2024, 11:01:08 UTC
Last modified: 9 Aug 2024, 11:06:00 UTC

And with the first cup of coffee at 12:45 starting up with the biscuits I have.

So here I was in the shop yesterday for the most needed and here biscuits and beer for the weekend at first.

But not taking any of three cards each having a valid expiration date but the cards themselves may or might be a problem.

Also a fourth card dating back from last year but should not matter when it does not take the first ones.

But here getting the suggestion that I should use only the most recent card or the one listed as valid so trying that one first, but may have received the wrong cards
meant for use including a VISA-card and need to return back home for picking it up.

But having the codedevice for the bank and here now 800 in local currency plus 5000 on a funds account (no physical card) and also 5000 on PayPal.

I had to return back the items bought for not being able to pay and here still a valid expiration date and if overcharging I could have kept the biscuits.

And this written in a hurry so should be another way of telling it as well but apparently no biscuits and beer for the evening.

More that the three cards could be having expiration date 2025 and the last one for this year, or 10/24.
ID: 2139291 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139508 - Posted: 15 Aug 2024, 17:39:16 UTC
Last modified: 15 Aug 2024, 17:42:32 UTC

So fish for dinner today but we had pancakes yesterday but only for having fish the day before I choose to skip the dinner and makes me angry.

Therefore was able to buy apricot in the shop but should tell that this is not dessert but jar instead so needing a spoon.

So here only following Betelgeuse right now but could return back at T Coronae Borealis if there are any news or warrants.

Here a nova is still not any supernova for only the rare it is but could still shine up in the sky when appearing.

So when the room is also cold at sitting not any fun it becomes but having a purchased fan oven but the culprit is that it becomes cold when turning it off.

Meant immediately when still turning it off but here writing at speed with the jar.

Anyway, but could I prove on failing grounds if it could be still observed and here a UFO.

Only that nature is for a meaning and for that I could be visited in a room.
ID: 2139508 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139522 - Posted: 15 Aug 2024, 21:52:39 UTC
Last modified: 15 Aug 2024, 22:10:43 UTC

Am I a product of nature for not any believed and next we could make it aliens instead for only prove.

Just that of Uncertainty could be Logic for not any itself and having the beer.

Only having two eyes when still a nose in between so not any ....

Count for that of many for not any more and it was still existing but also could become a duplicate.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel

Let us try here on the spot when not any quantized either or could perhaps be more than other things.

This thing becomes for another when also more here instead.

Heaven and Hell is only a part of nature created for a Creator still a single thing here instead.

Forgot the UFO I could prove here so next only argh.
ID: 2139522 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139676 - Posted: 20 Aug 2024, 23:23:13 UTC
Last modified: 20 Aug 2024, 23:23:57 UTC

I was sitting or waiting for the food or perhaps some help in the room when a fly sat down and got acquainted with me.

I do not know, but for some reason it came along with me when returning back to my room but not seen it lately.

Should tell, but these flies could still look black for only appearance but could be carrying Intelligence in their heads for only hiding it when
looking for food instead and here Metabolism.

I am an allergic so therefore I do not pick in everything but only what ... could be friendly.

For that they could be evolved but also choosing to hide it when still ....

Here insects should not be any mammals for only a difference but also ...

But also they could be black for color and not any liked when having the beer so ...

I could still seek for only try but also having feeble wings and therefore not letting anyone touch me, but only we thought Instinct could be deciding.

Such a thing could be mutual but for that also dependence of each other for living.
ID: 2139676 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139677 - Posted: 20 Aug 2024, 23:29:44 UTC
Last modified: 20 Aug 2024, 23:36:40 UTC

No, but it lies a piece of bread on my dish which is worn and rather it chooses to buzz around my head after settling down on the edge so here a difference.

Just black for only color and not any liked but also having self for thinking so here it could be my friend.

Here insects should not be any mammals but only disfavored for the option we could make.

So, how could stupid be for an idiot and not any insect here instead?

Forgot but it could be instinct for having and not any behaving here instead.

And here for some reason nature could have been created hard for not any light so here only a crocodile instead.

We could be together for only exist but here nature as a whole.
ID: 2139677 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139678 - Posted: 20 Aug 2024, 23:41:59 UTC
Last modified: 21 Aug 2024, 0:01:20 UTC

I am an allergic so therefore not picking anything I could see.

For some reason it could end up in the middle and here should be for both the humans and flies (insects) we could make.

And for that better suited for also adapted when it should be nature for its purpose.

Everything should still be for that of its purpose but next also needed when nature could be existing and for that not any flowers.

We could be questioning Laws that could exist but should be other here instead.

Second Commandment - You shall not have any other gods than me but also other Laws for that of needed.

Here volume should be space when it also could be emptiness around and here for Euclidean space but also it could move along its trajectory.

Each thing when it could be obvious but also property when it could be inclined and here such a thing could be behaved for not any ...

Or rather inclined for not any constituted instead and here needs an edit.

I could be living in separate rooms for only different but also knocking on the door if needed.
ID: 2139678 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139680 - Posted: 21 Aug 2024, 0:05:57 UTC
Last modified: 21 Aug 2024, 0:18:12 UTC

For one thing it should be a limit but also a reservation and here for the opposite thing but also my mouse borks.

If it should be nature for one thing also it could exist but next for another which should be only a different thing.

So what made me only think it could be so for not any nature another thing here instead?

For one thing it becomes created but also part of believed when it should be another thing here instead.

Such a thing could only be a close or close up for not any other Laws we could make here instead.

Suffice for only making it nature for a being and not any created when it only could be so.

No, but here it destroys when it could be only "of" for a difference.

Just rest for a hotel and it becomes "scandic" hah-ha.
ID: 2139680 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139746 - Posted: 22 Aug 2024, 21:48:01 UTC
Last modified: 22 Aug 2024, 21:59:58 UTC

Apologize for the previous post and it became wrapped.

But here at home today by agreement with the separate attorney engaged and visiting basement and loft but not the flat.

He made a couple of photographs upstairs but I stayed after he left and put the boxes back in place.

So here an insect for a fly in the common room and I carried it back to my own room using my finger and the others laughed at me.

Here got tired and that should also show up but sitting down with a couple of beers for relaxing.

Anyway but I questioned the Mind for the brilliant it could be but also could fall asleep.

Just Certainty for happening and it also could be stupidity in the same way.

So here we had a full Moon the other day and I could almost walk on it but also Jupiter could be bright for shining.

Anyway, but here a light year is almost 10 trillion km or 3.26 parsec so who could travel that distance?

Just nobody's fool and it was Chaos instead and apologize for the beer.

Just the Universe could be a fantastic place to live in but also it could be both small and large.
ID: 2139746 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139799 - Posted: 23 Aug 2024, 23:50:21 UTC
Last modified: 23 Aug 2024, 23:51:58 UTC

Now I could be moaning.

Here because the fly I chose to carry back to my room chose to lick from my finger but not showing its personality for being clapped on its wings or I rather wanted to hug it for being nice.

For that it chose to leave and I have not seen it again or perhaps it moved to another room.

Only that I used the finger for clapping it but next it jumped away perhaps because I was a little large or maybe my finger here instead.

So either I could be stupid for doing such a thing but also I could be an Allergic for selecting carefully before any clapping here instead.

Apologies for the beer but it should not be an insect to blame when it could be carrying viruses.
ID: 2139799 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139823 - Posted: 25 Aug 2024, 0:51:58 UTC
Last modified: 25 Aug 2024, 1:03:35 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyFFRIp3M7U&lc=UgzuylJPe8SpFwz6c4V4AaABAg

And here clapping the insect for my stupidity again but it did not want it.

At least it could be some size and entering my finger in front for that of licking but here it became only biscuits left for a part.

Or maybe jumping in between for only across and it became different, sorry.

Edit: I could be listening to the videos and think that some 1/3 could be true.
ID: 2139823 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139876 - Posted: 26 Aug 2024, 23:56:23 UTC
Last modified: 27 Aug 2024, 0:06:38 UTC

I logged out from PrimeGrid for trying another account but think I am not always welcome here.

So if these things could exist also they should be part of nature and we call it only UFO's for only nicknaming it.

These things should be in between for not any before or ahead so next we also could prove it.

Here one thing could be natural and another logical but that should be for only separate meaning when another could be existing.

Such a thing could be still premature but next I made it only UFO's for replacing such a concept it could be.

But if such a concept should be existing for nature also it has to be created and next by another hand.

Versus for existing and also it should be for comparing when still not any other thing but only we made it same-sounding.
ID: 2139876 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139877 - Posted: 27 Aug 2024, 0:17:09 UTC
Last modified: 27 Aug 2024, 0:20:09 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/olg8Boea71s

Better the link for this but could be having the beer but also the link could vanish after posted.

Here Proof should be for a Creator and not necessarily any aliens we could make for only a difference.

Give nature a look and it was also such a thing but here someone else could be writing for me for already mentioned.

Just closed could be locked so next I could be stuck for a meaning when also a difference with another thing which should be existing.

Or maybe at least so next it should be close for only the locked it perhaps already could be.

Here nature should not be any other thing for only explained because that should be a difference for also its meaning.

Just population should be for stars when Helium but next the thread could be following me for only the video being watched.
ID: 2139877 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139878 - Posted: 27 Aug 2024, 0:25:04 UTC
Last modified: 27 Aug 2024, 0:35:19 UTC

Just difference for meaning and also it was created but here for another meaning existing when it also could be that of such.

In for such meaning we gave it a name but also created for a part when it could exist for nature but next for only Logic when also a Fallacy.

But only we perhaps know and that should be ahead for not any behind when it only could be resemblance but also for time.

Such a thing should be time and next for only a Sequence because it could be happening and next an Event when it could appear.

Here not any on the other hand or however because that should be only for happening when also existing so next only Logic here instead.

Such a thing could be bind but also computed so next it should be another for existing instead but not giving him any name.

But also it could be thorough for not any through and could be missing the small detail not any visible.
ID: 2139878 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139879 - Posted: 27 Aug 2024, 0:34:25 UTC
Last modified: 27 Aug 2024, 0:46:04 UTC

Moved it to the previous so having the beer but also it could be deciding.

We know that each subject should follow its own genre so also follow the leader.

Should I prove and next only confused for not any Fallacy I could make it for also fantastic.

So why this order for following and not any direction for following so next it became only substituting instead.

This thing could be stupendous for also fantastic when only different words we could choose for the same meaning.
ID: 2139879 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7257
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2139942 - Posted: 29 Aug 2024, 0:05:07 UTC

Problem with slips so perhaps Questions and Answers instead but not translating correctly for my narrative language.

Anyway, it slips and here for only a laptop at disposal but also could be a full blown PC for having and that is standing at home.

So next when pressing ALT-TAB nothing is happening immediately for only a trip to the Moon or perhaps I was sent there instead.

This is frustrating for also irritating and here Linux is better for that of operating system for not any Linguistics it should be for interpreting instead.
ID: 2139942 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 337 · 338 · 339 · 340 · 341 · 342 · 343 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.