Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 327 · 328 · 329 · 330 · 331 · 332 · 333 . . . 336 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2132608 - Posted: 15 Feb 2024, 7:34:19 UTC

Not following for still only fool.
ID: 2132608 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2132609 - Posted: 15 Feb 2024, 7:41:22 UTC

In for such when only implicit and next only becoming, for not another.

Only that it became created for multiverses for only spawning, and not any other method here instead.

Such a thing becomes a sift when we could choose for all the methods it could be.

But also reminds me of partial for only enclosed, so still another meaning here instead.

Finite for only described when also such for a meaning and next it becomes for such a meaning when still only nature created.

Surpass for a meaning and next only believed for not any part of nature when it only should be created.

Versus another thing for only existing and it should be a difference, but next only for words.

Here I believed in such difference but next only for words and not any created.

Subtle for a meaning perhaps and I made it an equivalence, but next only for Laws.
ID: 2132609 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2132612 - Posted: 15 Feb 2024, 12:40:59 UTC
Last modified: 15 Feb 2024, 12:48:00 UTC

??

Here for just only a question mark and it becomes contents here instead.

Or maybe a double sentence for a meaning here instead.

No, but here for only a thing explained and next becoming a difference.

Subtle thing for only becoming and next it could be only nature here instead.

Here instead for a meaning for not any next for only becoming.

Such a thing for only result and still only created.
ID: 2132612 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2132618 - Posted: 15 Feb 2024, 13:37:24 UTC
Last modified: 15 Feb 2024, 13:38:35 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVOuYquXuuc

This because I could "screw" it for only a meaning when only listening on my behalf, or perhaps comfort.

So here asking for another sound driver if it could be existing, so next only thanks.

Just only sound and it could be listening for loud, of course.
ID: 2132618 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2132644 - Posted: 16 Feb 2024, 6:14:07 UTC
Last modified: 16 Feb 2024, 6:22:38 UTC

The sound problem was apparently solved, but I still have to do a couple of things myself for having everything sorted, including the display.

But also I heard a rumor around that there should be no aliens around or that chances for such are unlikely.

I guess this could still be about Proof, but also the observational facts we could make, including witnessing and possible close calls.

Or maybe that such a thing could only tell about the opposite when still not any proven.

But also that this is about a nature which is undefined or undetermined and next everything could happen for only context or meaning but still only random.

This thing for the other could be still only random but also it could be a chance when still not any implicit, so next only opposite instead.

Or maybe vice versa for still not any implicit, so next it was only a chance, and therefore it becomes casual luck.

And next just that for also happiness and it becomes love, but still only casual for such when not any random.

Prove the witness and next also Fact, for still not any casual instead when also random, because that becomes not any implicit.

So next only implicit for being understood and it was translated for meaning but still only the witness.

But here it only becomes misuse of a couple of sentences for not any casual love instead.
ID: 2132644 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2132683 - Posted: 17 Feb 2024, 8:38:47 UTC
Last modified: 17 Feb 2024, 8:40:00 UTC

And just not any heavy for not any light either because such a thing should be only a method to prove.
ID: 2132683 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2132684 - Posted: 17 Feb 2024, 8:42:28 UTC
Last modified: 17 Feb 2024, 8:44:20 UTC

So strange, but those Ideas you could have could be different than mine for only meaning.

Need to prove it within a limit for only nature and it should be also necessary.
ID: 2132684 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2132685 - Posted: 17 Feb 2024, 8:52:33 UTC

I got the driver back from a restart but also failing, but here also poor sound.

Need to adjust the volume knob above 50%, but still not satisfied with the sound I could get.
ID: 2132685 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2132768 - Posted: 19 Feb 2024, 11:25:23 UTC

I do not know if it was because of any Windows updates or a restart, but this happening again.

So here ending at the bottom of the buffer in Notepad after inserting a new line and when switching to another task and next returning back, it jumps down a whole page for becoming a blank one.

Here it gets so annoying and needs a fix as soon as possible.
ID: 2132768 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2132851 - Posted: 21 Feb 2024, 4:41:57 UTC
Last modified: 21 Feb 2024, 4:45:26 UTC

So when I posted here before, I wanted to be a little nuanced or balanced for not distressing any other.

And therefore also careful, because the general assumption is that there is no others around.

Such a thing is perhaps not any proving either, but only the impression we could have or make about a couple of things.

Anyway, so foil for still not any fools and it could be others for existing instead.

The other thing could be only nature for its manifold when we also could be comparing.
ID: 2132851 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20518
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2132866 - Posted: 21 Feb 2024, 12:09:38 UTC

Yes, there are others around!

... To share thoughts and hope...


Be excellent to All!

Enjoy!
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2132866 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2132895 - Posted: 22 Feb 2024, 2:42:19 UTC
Last modified: 22 Feb 2024, 2:59:33 UTC

The difference becomes a God versus a Creator for the first only believed and the other in charge or behind nature.

For that I could be making it some 110 globular clusters part of the Milky Way, and they could be existing in such objects as well.

I guess a Creator should still be a difference for only above all other when still nature, and here also aliens.

And for just only a purpose when still only nature meant, he should be another thing.

Reminds me that we at least could make it a Type III civilization for its star fleet or destroyers.

Or rather a Command ship when Lord Vader could be still in charge.

Maybe it was just only for entertainment but also it was a green forest for part of it.

Just better for only a story and it was not any believed either and therefore only a part of what we could make everything.

Just fiction instead and it could not be any proven either.

I wish you a better day for not any worse, because next it only could end up bad.

Therefore regardless of any other and you only could make it nature for its infinite meaning instead.

Just nature for its own meaning for not any of his meaning and it became only a green forest instead.
ID: 2132895 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2132897 - Posted: 22 Feb 2024, 3:13:08 UTC
Last modified: 22 Feb 2024, 3:20:40 UTC

That also makes a reminder of women or females who succumbed to death, and here by cancer.

Among these both Carrie Fisher and my mother and also some other members of my family as well.

But also the flies that ended up on my leap because they were houseclean or tidy and wanted to greet me.

That is because they became used to me and did not want to fly away when opening a window.

A parasite is still one thing while a fly is a scavenger, so here a difference, because it becomes Metabolism and therefore living on nutrition.

But also choosing to hide themselves when only still scavengers, so here they still ended up on my leap, some three in all.

Just those small are always small, so here I chose to rearbutt it using my fingers for perhaps teasing it a little.

But also small feet and only a trunk when still not any more, so here not any more it could do either.

Here everything is smashed for its part when only infinite, so next only each part for such a thing here as well.

And that becomes nature for only its detail and not any whole for only the Chaos it could be.
ID: 2132897 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2132904 - Posted: 22 Feb 2024, 4:15:22 UTC
Last modified: 22 Feb 2024, 4:16:54 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5quO70zcYk

Found the link, but something could be still missing against the other I could be doing it here as well.

Anywway, so still only for and not any against and it should not be for any other here either.

You know, but if I made it science incorporated also the aliens I could prove.
ID: 2132904 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2133047 - Posted: 24 Feb 2024, 23:18:54 UTC

I am having the rest of the beer tonight, but was questioning the validness of Proof against the science we could make.

Perhaps no such thing if we could know that it could be infinite, but that we still have to prove a couple of aliens.

I am for just only meant and next also to be and therefore I am still sitting in the chair with the TV in front of me.

Nature makes such a thing because I have been created, and therefore also "for" for such a thing, because it should be against some other, but rather opposite direction.

He is the maker and therefore it also becomes where it comes from first and becoming multiverses from the create he makes.

So here experiencing a hang when writing, but we already know that it was an Euclidean space created at first.

Anyway, but the hang experienced destroys the Idea that I could be having.
ID: 2133047 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2133048 - Posted: 24 Feb 2024, 23:24:44 UTC
Last modified: 24 Feb 2024, 23:34:56 UTC

As I just said, the moderator thinks I could prove aliens for any price if not already there.

The only thing I know is Tic-tac and here experienced by military pilots.

From my own or current knowledge, these could be probes of some sorts, but not necessarily inhabited by any aliens.

But here not "perhaps" either, because that could rather be Probability as the question, but not necessarily the answer either.

Relate to infinity as the question for not any aliens and it could be the answer here instead.

For that you should not be able to prove any infinity either, because that should be impossible.

Versus nature for one thing versus another and it could be still only compared.

And therefore existing versus non-existing only for Logic when also making it Religion for the same.

Part for one thing when still existing and it was still coming from something else for becoming nature.

Preceding for only before and it becomes only time for not he creating instead.

Versus he for not any him and it becomes only resembling except also looking better, and therefore it becomes that of sex for not any "she" here instead.
ID: 2133048 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2133228 - Posted: 29 Feb 2024, 5:50:28 UTC
Last modified: 29 Feb 2024, 5:53:17 UTC

And here a little sad, because the toilet could be located for the first door after the entrance when I could be using the key to lock myself in.

So when sitting and doing my show for that of pumping, I leave the door open and here a curious fly coming by and next being caught and eaten by a spider who could be having a nest close to the floor.

One thing is that the spider could become hungry for not noticing that it is eating that often, but also I feel compassion with the little fly I got acquainted to and next could also steel my food.

Anyway, so next only a purpose when it could be still eatning, for not crawling on six or eight feet for still only being a fly for not any spider.

So here for not any curious and it did not enter my hallway either, but next only this time for being caught by a spider.
ID: 2133228 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2133695 - Posted: 10 Mar 2024, 3:46:01 UTC
Last modified: 10 Mar 2024, 3:48:03 UTC

Here you are only a part of it for not any juxtaposed, so next I am having a couple of beers.

Anyway, I was looking for the other name for only comparing, but not finding that.

The thing which should still exist also should be proven, and next nature for such a thing.

Or rather it became UFO's flying around in the sky, so next you only could prove for their presence.

This thing for only nature meant could be still existing, but not necessarily only UFO's for such a thing because it also could be proven.

So here that of Truth becomes only a part when also Certainty for that of Logic.

Everything is created for only a part for representing, but next it also should belong to another for still existing, and that becomes meaning for only a part.
ID: 2133695 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2133697 - Posted: 10 Mar 2024, 4:32:12 UTC

Let me get back at this when only a scavenger, but next only a fly.

But also they chose to sit down on my leap, only because they are tidy and choose to clean their feet.

There is no nature for such a thing for only existing, but also it could be for not any let alone.

Choose it to be for next only so kind and it could be disciples for such, but next only for following when still nature for another when still only created.

And that becomes still only another for creating when also created, so next only becoming a misuse of words for such a thing.

There should be no absolute of nature for only implicit instead, but next it only becomes infinite for only a part.

Proving should be still implicit, but next only such a thing for making it extraterrestrials instead, and next I already thought it could be there.
ID: 2133697 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7102
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2133698 - Posted: 10 Mar 2024, 4:41:42 UTC
Last modified: 10 Mar 2024, 4:49:01 UTC

Anyway, but should I only complement for making it resembling, for not any Equation here instead?

Just that of Recursion could be that of more, for still not any resembling for only equivalence here instead.

Or rather I still only quantified, for making one thing more than another.

Such a thing should be still only Laws when that of equivalence, but here not any Recursion for such a thing.

Regardless of nature for still only infinite and next I quantized for such a thing for only the different it could be.

Valid should be still implicit, so next you could dismiss Recursion when it could be only another thing.
ID: 2133698 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 327 · 328 · 329 · 330 · 331 · 332 · 333 . . . 336 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.