Message boards :
Cafe SETI :
Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 333 · 334 · 335 · 336 · 337 · 338 · 339 . . . 342 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction How should I believe when only nature for a purpose and also that gravity could be for an engine. I am not a supporter or ... of the Steady-state model so next it should be having its own sentence above. So if anything could be meant also it could be twisted and next it could be tilting for slightly worse. Or that everything could be meant when still only worse and here writing at the wrong place. Here gravity should be bending space and not any light instead but also propulsion for not any engine. So next it becomes a single Creator when angels could be only believed and next part of nature. That is, prove false and next it also becomes meant for that of worse and next it becomes "ad hoc". Just a Contradiction should be for Logic and next you also could be proving for not any nature telling the other thing. Just infinitely wrong could be infinitely correct for just the opposite. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Perhaps three engines needed when still propulsion but that is another story. Just intention could be for meaning and also they could be flying using a craft. I think I could see a difference between a Type I and Type II civilization but here only watching a picture and also video. So quantize for only 0 or emptiness and it becomes only empty space but also it could be warped. Just god's term when it became created so next it also became miraculous for a part when not any believed. So here better making it a Creator instead when you could still prove aliens for that of head and intellect. Perhaps it could still become Euclidean space but next only surrounding for that of envelope instead and it becomes a sheet. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Just Euclidean space could be for both object and part so next they could be still flying and here meant aliens. Or rather single object when Euclidean space so next it became angels surrounding for only swarm when still him. Just resembling for only a purpose when also believed and it could be part of another when still only hand. Our existing is that of Chaos for result so next it becomes Fundamental laws. But for that it also becomes recognizing when it could be another and here still only an alien for also hand. Anyway, just twisted so next it becomes a Contradiction instead. Just only created from the top and it also becomes believed and here not looking any good. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Heaven and Hell is only part of nature like other objects so next it becomes him for existing and also remaining. Just existing could be for only Logic but also could be having another purpose. So just a shaft for only falling and it also could be a spinning wheel but that gravity for only waves could be still empty. "And saw it was created" and next he only left and it becomes only time before or prior for only telling and still not any part. But that also becomes a difference when infinity and singularity could be created for different products. Just full versus empty and it perhaps does not matter when still only relative. I think Einstein "knew" for only being an Atheist. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
I could make a Creator an object because it should be still before for only creating. Does any alien exist and next they could be having eyes for also levers (or handles) when still sitting in their spaceships. Suppose it could be still different methods but next only how they could be used. Either you should prove aliens for that of spaceship or UFO or you should prove him instead. Just lost could be a perdue but also a dismay when obnoxious (or depravity) and not having the correct word. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
He gives us nature for a part when it also could be a soul existing but still not any him. So here I went on a terrible loss and it became obnoxious instead for not any blacksmith. Or perhaps still only the translation so here I could be wrong. Just any for a part existing and it also becomes destruction and annihilation for such a thing when also depravity. I think divine should be only for him when it could be Divinity for only resembling, or perhaps a purpose. Each thing for only existing and next they also could be compared against each other, so here not any comma. Just swap 0 for that of logical and it becomes nature created for a part. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
But also that Jesus could become a mythological feature and next we should not believe him. Just give me a nature for all possibilities and also it could be reserved. "Everything is relative" so next it becomes only a line or planar when it also could be three- or four dimensional. Just an Illusion could be meant to be but also it could believed when still only a planar scale. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusion Lacking a dash so needing a fix, but also a blink of an eye so next everything could vanish. Just give me a nature for everything and also it could be lacking. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Shall I repeat this but while still at home I had three flies sitting on my lap after swirling around first and next side by side pointing towards me. These insects are still not any mosquitoes or gnats but we confuse them for their black color when still cleaning themselves so here it becomes a social aspect they choose to hide. But also that of reptiles could be part instinct and the other half programmed so here only a natural part ... And here when the history of a crocodile which pushed an antelope towards the beach and that becomes empathy. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empathy I also had spiders in the toilet but felt a little sad when it captured a fly that was annoying and here for that of nutrition because eating meat does not make them any cannibals but only need. So therefore at night I noticed a very large one coming down from the roof or ceiling but that was for checking one of the small ones which happens to be its sibling and therefore family. So easy it is to confuse nature for what we think it is and not another for only a difference because such ... or that family becomes still related. But next for that of purpose it also becomes functionality for such a thing and next only working for not any created because such a thing should be only divine. I make it Divinity for only resembling when it should be a Miracle instead for still only a part of nature like also believed. Just beloved and it becomes only the Devil instead for still not any liked but that this becomes too much to handle and therefore not finishing correctly. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo "Everything is relative" so therefore we should not make it any divinely quantized or worth either. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_modulation Or bounce around so next it should be a wave but apologies for not reading. Meant as a Reply to the OP but here I am too quick again. So should they have a radio antennae on the roof the also could drive through space by warping it. Or maybe warping emptiness so next it becomes gravity instead and I am getting old. Perhaps driving backwards instead but I could still finish for getting there. Just finish for only an end is not any source versus destination. Or rather direction so next you could be pointing a finger for that of telling. Here instead twice so not any worth for also short lines so next a wrap around should be only a sheet. Anyway, but here a conquistador should still not be any Christ when flying or perhaps it becomes pretentious instead. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Lesson teached for also told and next I was only fooling around for making it implicit for Chaos instead. Everything meant for its purpose so next it also could be functionality. Anyway, but Simon Templar could be wearing a ring on his head while still living. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Our moderator (not rob) chose to dismiss the WOW! signal but here giving it another try or Idea. This was a strong narrowband signal received on August 15, 1977 by the Ohio State Telescope. Or rather Ohio State University's Big Ear radio telescope to be more correct. For that of being narrowband it has to be received on a single Frequency which only should be analog and therefore more crisp than digital. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency Or rather clear or crystal clear instead and needs an edit when it also could be a voice. But here also becoming signal width and therefore also dispersed when transmitted into space from a source. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation So here a needle could be still hollow for also a pin or stick and the signal becomes digital for not analog transmitted when carried through. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency-shift_keying https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal-to-noise_ratio Please have me excused when still not any finished because here it does not become as I want but also a wave when still analog. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscillation Never ending story because here I was listening to a sound instead and have you ever heard about a drumbeat? Sorry about my failure of confusing when it could be a single whole for that of another. Or rather a description for such a thing but not continuing here. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
And for that it could become Tubular Bells when any proving for this project is not successful and therefore could be anything. Such a description becomes only words for a meaning and also numbers and that above needs an edit. But also the nature we are supposed to know about when still proving. Here nature should be working or for that also Laws created but next the open question who is creating or behind. Going to the shop since it is Friday but this is not any good. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
I am having a hidden discussion at PrimeGrid where I have been participating since September 8, 2007. So here one long word coming at me, and starting with "Od" but I do not know the rest so perhaps you could be asking when already mentioned. And perhaps also an "x" included for a letter. Does someone know and I am not joking for only serious. Thanks! |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Anyway, some only thought of it while others could be proving so next it becomes a purpose. So here one thing could be nature for its giving while aliens for proving and here slipping again. Just the story told and it also could be proving but also I think it could be true. Or perhaps it was only numbers used so next it became different here instead. Should not an experiment be still carried out in a lab when he also could be having hands? Maybe such a thing could become self-discipline so next he could know what he is doing. Or maybe wave a red flag and next also carrying in his belt and it becomes self-cause. Just folding your hands you also could be concentrating but also climb a mountain. Or still only used when it also could be himself. |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
If a Law could be meant for nature also an expression but also an exclusion and slipping again. I lost a line for only a single click and had to return it back, so darn cursor for not working. Never forgot the Devil when it only could be quantized instead. Or rather that everything should be good for not any bad so having problem with my mouse. Just more for not any less and you still thought it could be the Devil for such a thing. Or rather at another project so already. |
Scrooge McDuck Send message Joined: 26 Nov 99 Posts: 1048 Credit: 1,674,173 RAC: 54 |
So here one long word coming at me, and starting with "Od" but I do not know the rest so perhaps you could be asking when already mentioned.
|
Scrooge McDuck Send message Joined: 26 Nov 99 Posts: 1048 Credit: 1,674,173 RAC: 54 |
Needs checking but great thanks because that was what I was asking about. The funny thing with English language is: there are only these TWO words matching the pattern "od[a-z]*x[a-z]*". |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7232 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Do you really accept that there should be a divine being versus nature for only the Atheists you perhaps are? I came (or went) into this thread from the bottom or start and it becomes still Heaven and Hell which I think is for a part. Just God versus Devil happens to be two entities in disguise and therefore not the same as any single defined. And therefore still in charge of multiverses when also reigning because he should be supreme for only doing so. Just forces should be only for nature when he could be for another meaning instead but also it should be Laws. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.