Message boards :
SETI@home Science :
How is a candidate signal first reported to staff scientists?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Michael Watson Send message Joined: 7 Feb 08 Posts: 1385 Credit: 2,098,506 RAC: 5 |
For all we know, the delay in hearing from extraterrestrials may be due to their ideas about when contact with us should occur, rather than their rarity, or their distance from us. We may have to cross some threshold of development and/or preparation before we're deemed ready. |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
For all we know, the delay in hearing from extraterrestrials may be due to their ideas about when contact with us should occur, rather than their rarity, or their distance from us. We may have to cross some threshold of development and/or preparation before we're deemed ready. Given our track record if I were them no contact with earth would be permitted under pain of death. We are too unprepared for interstellar relations. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Julie Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34054 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 |
|
Michael Watson Send message Joined: 7 Feb 08 Posts: 1385 Credit: 2,098,506 RAC: 5 |
We don't appear to be able to put ourselves in the place of extraterrestrials contemplating contact with Earth. How could we know what they, an entirely different species and culture, would view as adequate preparation on our part? It's possible that we could be harsher judges of ourselves than they would be, or more pessimistic about how we would cope with their presence. |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
If they could detect us then it is likely that we could detect them. It is unlikely that anyone else knows that we are here. It is possible that no one else will ever know. If we were beaming a message at promising directions in the Cosmos then maybe the chances would be greater of getting a return message. |
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22286 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
Earth has been "radio bright" for a little over 100 years. For the first third of that time it was a pretty dull glimmer, but then rapidly got quite a bit brighter, first with the advent of national and international radio broadcasting, then with advent of television, radar. Realistically any feedback would come from a civilisation that had been performing a survey over many years observing this increase in activity, in much the same way as we are doing in SETI@Home. If we assume that for the first few years we were too dim to be observable, then the radius at which we could be observed, and a message sent back is 50 light years There are 1875 stars within 50 light years of earth, which is a pretty small number when considering the number of stars in the universe. (Edit to correct number of stars - I looked at a list of "naked eye stars", not a full list) Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
Julie Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34054 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 |
On Mars, no proof yet, but scientists’ search for extraterrestrial life continues The astrobiological truism is that life finds a way. rOZZ Music Pictures |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
1875 stars within 50 light years of earth Many of these are binary stars and many are not main sequence stars such as our Sun. |
Michael Watson Send message Joined: 7 Feb 08 Posts: 1385 Credit: 2,098,506 RAC: 5 |
About 90 percent of those 1875 stars are on the main sequence. Many wide binary stars could have stable planets orbiting around either star, and close binaries could have such planets circling both. http://www.space.com/22437-main-sequence-stars.html http://www.solstation.com/habitable.htm |
Michael Watson Send message Joined: 7 Feb 08 Posts: 1385 Credit: 2,098,506 RAC: 5 |
If they could detect us then it is likely that we could detect them. It is unlikely that anyone else knows that we are here. It is possible that no one else will ever know. If we were beaming a message at promising directions in the Cosmos then maybe the chances would be greater of getting a return message.Make a new instrument, double the size of the largest radio telescope (Arecibo), and sensitivity goes up four times. Even the new 500 meter radio telescope China is building won't be able to match that for sensitivity. Double the size again and sensitivity goes up 16 fold. This doesn't seem too much to hope for from a civilization thousands, or millions of years more technically advanced than our own. |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
Many wide binary stars could have stable planets orbiting around either star For intelligent, communicating (electronically) life to form, The orbit must be stable, the planet cannot wobble on its axis and the orbit must be nearly circular. |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
Many wide binary stars could have stable planets orbiting around either star Intelligence is developed as a means to adapt to varying conditions. It might be that extreme variability of environment would make intelligence develop sooner. The "life as we know it" concept must be our baseline in thinking about extraterrestrial life, but it is probably a mistake to think our environment is typical. Joe |
Julie Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34054 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 |
|
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
Since the primal elements appear to be the same throughout the universe, many believe that intelligent life would be carbon-based and be very much like has happened on Earth. I think that they would have to be more advanced than we are since I think it would take any signal from them tens of thousands of years to reach us. It would be thrilling to find out if any of these suppositions is true or false. |
Julie Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34054 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 |
|
Lynn Send message Joined: 20 Nov 00 Posts: 14162 Credit: 79,603,650 RAC: 123 |
The "Men in Black" do exist. The "Men in Black" official name is the "Majestic 12" commissioned by Harry Truman. Its a Federal entity which means they are governed by the Taxpayers, secretly of course. +1 for The "Men in Black". |
Julie Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34054 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 |
|
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
The "Men in Black" do exist. The "Men in Black" official name is the "Majestic 12" commissioned by Harry Truman. Its a Federal entity which means they are governed by the Taxpayers, secretly of course. Any evidence for this? Or is this another "I know someone on the inside"? |
Julie Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34054 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 |
Interesting read... http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/AlienIntelligence.html rOZZ Music Pictures |
Lynn Send message Joined: 20 Nov 00 Posts: 14162 Credit: 79,603,650 RAC: 123 |
Thanks Julie, for the article. When and IF we encounter an Alien, don't think any one of those things will apply. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.