Message boards :
Number crunching :
SCHEDULER_REPLY::parse(): bad first tag Content-type: text/plain
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 27 Nov 99 Posts: 78 Credit: 633,713 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Anyone else getting this? Happening on all my BOINC/SETI machines... Cheers, Nic. > Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi > Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi Succeeded > SCHEDULER_REPLY::parse(): bad first tag Content-type: text/plain > Can't parse scheduler reply ------------------------------------------------ Once you have ruled out the impossible, everything else, however improbable, is possible! A.C. Doyle. |
![]() Send message Joined: 17 Jan 01 Posts: 2 Credit: 4,043,917 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Yup same here |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Oct 02 Posts: 494 Credit: 346,224 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 02 Posts: 13 Credit: 33,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Ditto. ~~ When I was a child, I caught a Fleeting Glimpse. |
KWSN_Dagger ![]() Send message Joined: 14 Feb 04 Posts: 36 Credit: 3,578 RAC: 0 ![]() |
SCHEDULER_REPLY::parse(): bad first tag Content-type: text/plain 2004-07-01 15:53:15 [SETI@home] Can't parse scheduler reply Yep :( |
![]() Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 1 Credit: 4,483,646 RAC: 6 ![]() |
Same with me... |
Kerwin Send message Joined: 7 Dec 99 Posts: 18 Credit: 10,635,562 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Does anyone know what it means? |
![]() Send message Joined: 24 Jan 01 Posts: 6 Credit: 2,053,406 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I came to this thread looking for others having the same problem. I'm getting it too. Seems to have started this afternoon (PDT). Could it be that they have reconfigured the software on their end and haven't yet posted the new client update to the web site? The other functionality of the client seems to be working now as of this afternoon. It was able to finally upload my last WU and grab an update to my account. it just can't get new work. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Jan 00 Posts: 2892 Credit: 1,499,890 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> I came to this thread looking for others having the same problem. I'm getting > it too. Seems to have started this afternoon (PDT). > > Could it be that they have reconfigured the software on their end and haven't > yet posted the new client update to the web site? I think this is the case. Last update to the source code I saw was scheduler related. ------------ KWSN-MajorKong KWSN Forum Admin (retired) http://www.kwsnforum.com S@H participant since May 28, 1999 (other acct.) BOINC Beta Tester since Nov 19, 2003 |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 2 Aug 00 Posts: 445 Credit: 503,693 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> I think this is the case. Last update to the source code I saw was scheduler > related. Seems like they figured it out... SETI@home - 2004-07-01 19:13:30 - Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi SETI@home - 2004-07-01 19:13:34 - Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded SETI@home - 2004-07-01 19:13:34 - SCHEDULER_REPLY::parse(): bad first tag Content-type: text/plain SETI@home - 2004-07-01 19:13:34 - Can't parse scheduler reply SETI@home - 2004-07-01 19:13:34 - Deferring communication with project for 1 hours, 10 minutes, and 25 seconds --- - 2004-07-01 19:45:49 - Fewer active results than CPUs; requesting more work SETI@home - 2004-07-01 19:45:49 - Requesting 54067 seconds of work SETI@home - 2004-07-01 19:45:49 - Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi SETI@home - 2004-07-01 19:46:23 - Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded SETI@home - 2004-07-01 19:46:23 - Started download of 01ja04aa.14693.28097.173580.17 SETI@home - 2004-07-01 19:46:30 - Finished download of 01ja04aa.14693.28097.173580.17 SETI@home - 2004-07-01 19:46:30 - Approximate throughput 50957.660058 bytes/sec SETI@home - 2004-07-01 19:46:30 - Starting computation for result 01ja04aa.14693.28097.173580.17_2 using setiathome version 3.08 SETI@home - 2004-07-01 20:32:48 - Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi SETI@home - 2004-07-01 20:33:02 - Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded Regards <FONT FACE='ARIAL'>chip w3range.net</FONT> <BR> ![]() |
atotos ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Feb 02 Posts: 51 Credit: 11,930 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I had this same problem several times last night CET time. It seems now it OK, but there is no work available :-( SETI@home - 2004-07-02 11:23:49 - Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi SETI@home - 2004-07-02 11:24:02 - Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded SETI@home - 2004-07-02 11:24:02 - Message from server: No work available SETI@home - 2004-07-02 11:24:02 - No work from project |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 17 Apr 02 Posts: 3 Credit: 33,899 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 13 Aug 99 Posts: 14 Credit: 113,602 RAC: 0 ![]() |
SETI@home - 2004-07-02 12:01:28 - Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi SETI@home - 2004-07-02 12:01:30 - Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi failed SETI@home - 2004-07-02 12:01:30 - No schedulers responded SETI@home - 2004-07-02 12:01:30 - Deferring communication with project for 16 minutes and 15 seconds Unfortunately, it is now back at this stage. I wish the stats would at least update... |
![]() Send message Joined: 1 Jan 00 Posts: 22 Credit: 3,425 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I agree... But its going to be some time before that happens. There are still alot of bugs to be worked out. ![]() www.jumppoint.org |
slimm Send message Joined: 7 May 99 Posts: 6 Credit: 3,742,855 RAC: 0 ![]() |
It's happening again SETI@home - 2004-07-02 13:29:20 - Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi SETI@home - 2004-07-02 13:29:23 - Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded SETI@home - 2004-07-02 13:29:23 - SCHEDULER_REPLY::parse(): bad first tag Content-type: text/plain SETI@home - 2004-07-02 13:29:23 - Can't parse scheduler reply SETI@home - 2004-07-02 13:29:23 - Deferring communication with project for 1 minutes and 50 seconds |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 7 Jul 00 Posts: 190 Credit: 566,047 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> It's happening again > > SETI@home - 2004-07-02 13:29:20 - Sending request to scheduler: > http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi > SETI@home - 2004-07-02 13:29:23 - Scheduler RPC to > http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded > SETI@home - 2004-07-02 13:29:23 - SCHEDULER_REPLY::parse(): bad first tag > Content-type: text/plain > SETI@home - 2004-07-02 13:29:23 - Can't parse scheduler reply > SETI@home - 2004-07-02 13:29:23 - Deferring communication with project for 1 > minutes and 50 seconds > And here SETI@home - 2004-07-02 19:37:01 - SCHEDULER_REPLY::parse(): bad first tag Content-type: text/plain You might subtract two hours to get GMT. |
slimm Send message Joined: 7 May 99 Posts: 6 Credit: 3,742,855 RAC: 0 ![]() |
And to think that they have been down some of this time to debug the "new scheduler". |
Guido_A_Waldenmeier_ Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 482 Credit: 4,774 RAC: 0 ![]() |
one picture say more then 1000 words (have you see the new boinc rules) [/url] another OS like NASA SYSTEM 5 or bsd will follow |
[ue] juuso Send message Joined: 9 Dec 02 Posts: 11 Credit: 300,677 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Same here...still no work... Only wierd errors... Have to be patience...? |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.