Message boards :
Science (non-SETI) :
Discussion of what logic is and is not?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
Author | Message |
---|---|
Sarge Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 12273 Credit: 8,569,109 RAC: 79 |
It is perhaps a poor name? If it relies on probability, then I am willing to bet there's a completely logically foundation for fuzzy logic, which in turn relies on the axiomatic set up on probability I already mentioned. There is only one way in which I came anywhere close to fuzzy logic of which I am aware. A prof had handed off to me something he had not been able to completely solve. He thought it would only get to a certain point and then would have to go off into something probabilistic. (We knew we could not determine the number of some things completely and why. But, I was able to show him that through a change in perspective we could determine it concretely with only one thing unknown, eliminating the need for probabilistic solutions.) |
Sarge Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 12273 Credit: 8,569,109 RAC: 79 |
Errr, completely logical. |
Sarge Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 12273 Credit: 8,569,109 RAC: 79 |
Course run. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.