Message boards :
Science (non-SETI) :
An astronomical event I would like to witness.
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
Super novas happen on average about once a century per galaxy which means we aren't very likely to witness one in the Milky Way. The nearest star that is on the verge of exploding is betelgeuse and according to what I've read and heard it could explode at any time. Again according to what I've heard it will be a spectacular sight while still not close enough to earth to impact us. While I'm not wishing any possible aliens a very bad day I would like to be around to see the event. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
tullio Send message Joined: 9 Apr 04 Posts: 8797 Credit: 2,930,782 RAC: 1 |
The last one was in 1604 in our Galaxy. So a supernova is overdue. Tullio |
john3760 Send message Joined: 9 Feb 11 Posts: 334 Credit: 3,400,979 RAC: 0 |
Yeah chris but the theories that it could go bang at any time are based from observations that are 600 years old (that is what we are seeing now) If it does go bang in the next couple of years then it will in fact have happened 600 or so years ago. It could go tonight. But you wouldn't see it for the fireworks in Edinburgh. |
john3760 Send message Joined: 9 Feb 11 Posts: 334 Credit: 3,400,979 RAC: 0 |
If it just actualy physically exploded now,we wouldn't know. We would have to wait 600 years for the light to reach us. The thought that it could blow at any minute can only be based on observations from 600 year old light. Therefore it could have (and probably has) already exploded, so when we "see" and therefore discover it ,we would be seeing live and in real time something that happened 600 years ago. So what i meant by bang tonight was the actual visible discovery. So instant viewing. We are saying the same thing in different ways aren't we ? john3760 Anyway off tho the pub. (I'm old fashioned i still like to wait till 12 on a sunday) |
john3760 Send message Joined: 9 Feb 11 Posts: 334 Credit: 3,400,979 RAC: 0 |
I prefer Newcastle Brown,but i had one for you anyway. |
john3760 Send message Joined: 9 Feb 11 Posts: 334 Credit: 3,400,979 RAC: 0 |
This actually got me thinking . What is the actual size of the universe at this moment in time ? We know it is 13.75 (or so) billion years old,because the most distant things we can "see" (detect) are 13.75 or so light years away. Our perception of the actual size of the universe is based on what we can see. But that light / radiation has taken 13.75 billion years to get to us ,so the emitters of this light/radiation can't possibly be in the same place as they were 13.75 billion years ago.They have had that amount of time to move at whatever speed everything moves apart, so the universe must be at "this moment in time as we see it" billions of times bigger than we percieve it. We would have to wait 13.75 billion years to see the size of the universe as it actually is at this moment in our time. Just a thought I'm probably horribly wrong. john3760 |
tullio Send message Joined: 9 Apr 04 Posts: 8797 Credit: 2,930,782 RAC: 1 |
As we look to the sky we see the past. Three supernovas were sighted in historical times, the Crab in 1054 a.D., the Tycho in 1572 and the Kepler in 1604, plus a Lupus in 1006. But they had exploded way before. Tullio |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
The Universe is 54 billion light years across. This is due to inflation and expansion at faster than the speed of light. |
skildude Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60 |
I thought it was 30 billion across. In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
john3760 Send message Joined: 9 Feb 11 Posts: 334 Credit: 3,400,979 RAC: 0 |
I googled THE SIZE OF THE UNIVERSE ,and came up with this. http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=http%3A%2F%2Fmembers.shaw.ca%2Ftfrisen%2Flee%2520strobel%2Fhow%2520big%2520is%2520our_universe.htm&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmembers.shaw.ca%2Ftfrisen%2FLee%2520Strobel%2Fhow%2520big%2520is%2520our_universe.htm&ei=wjYBT6KwLoXO8QPIoODWAQ&usg=AFQjCNHp6SSAzxMwZ0XausIxCu88xKav3w&sig2=tnauEHETkahbBDuixrL73g I'm pleased i didn't try to work it out myself,I'd probably be on a long time. john3760 |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
According to Stellarium Betelgeuse is 427.47 LY away so if it exploded 427.46 years ago we could be seeing it any time now. Tonight is a very clear and cool evening over central Florida and even to the naked eye Betelgeuse looks very red. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
I thought it was 30 billion across. Actually some claim 97 billion light years. Actual shape is not known--most believe it to be a sphere. Anyhow, If we believe that the universe is expanding at an increasing rate and has been doing so for billions of years then it will be wider than twice the estimated 14 billion years age since the conclusion is that it is expanding at greater than the speed of light. |
tullio Send message Joined: 9 Apr 04 Posts: 8797 Credit: 2,930,782 RAC: 1 |
Well, I am running Albert@home, which is a Beta Project like Test4Theory@home. Poor Uncle Albert would be surprised by many things, including neutrinos... Tullio |
john3760 Send message Joined: 9 Feb 11 Posts: 334 Credit: 3,400,979 RAC: 0 |
Do you know or can you point me in the right direction, where i can find out the latest data about the speed of the expansion of the universe. john 3760 |
tullio Send message Joined: 9 Apr 04 Posts: 8797 Credit: 2,930,782 RAC: 1 |
|
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
Another thread gone astray. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
JLConawayII Send message Joined: 2 Apr 02 Posts: 188 Credit: 2,840,460 RAC: 0 |
There are a few (from our perspective) that are on the verge. You may get your wish. I would also be thrilled to witness such an event. |
john3760 Send message Joined: 9 Feb 11 Posts: 334 Credit: 3,400,979 RAC: 0 |
Sorry Bob. I thought this thread had organicaly drifted. Most threads depart from their original title. I thought it was still scientific and something you and others would be interested in. I may have had a bit too much Newcastle Brown Ale recently. (the thinking mans drink) sorry again, and I hope this thread gets back on topic for you. john3760 |
Odysseus Send message Joined: 26 Jul 99 Posts: 1808 Credit: 6,701,347 RAC: 6 |
since the conclusion is that it is expanding at greater than the speed of light. The ‘Einsteinian speed limit’ is for stuff moving through space; it doesn’t apply to the expansion of space itself. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.