Einstein was wrong?

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Einstein was wrong?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1163870 - Posted: 20 Oct 2011, 9:04:25 UTC - in response to Message 1163682.  

Scientists are weighing in with explanations for the apparent discrepancy. A few of us have mentioned some of these here in this thread which are now being put forth with the Math to explain the missing nanoseconds.

remember velocity= distance/time all of which are subject to change --especially due to relative motion and gravity variances.
ID: 1163870 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 1163909 - Posted: 20 Oct 2011, 14:01:55 UTC - in response to Message 1163882.  

Well no, Chris, light years is a measure of distance. A light year is the distance light travels in one year.
Tullio
ID: 1163909 · Report as offensive
Profile Dr Imaginario

Send message
Joined: 10 Aug 11
Posts: 172
Credit: 22,735
RAC: 0
Portugal
Message 1163925 - Posted: 20 Oct 2011, 15:26:24 UTC - in response to Message 1163909.  

Well no, Chris, light years is a measure of distance. A light year is the distance light travels in one year.
Tullio


This is only valid if you consider that C is constant. There are now cientists who are challenging this.

If it's proven that the speed of light is not a constant, then all modern physics have to be revised.
ID: 1163925 · Report as offensive
Profile Dr Imaginario

Send message
Joined: 10 Aug 11
Posts: 172
Credit: 22,735
RAC: 0
Portugal
Message 1163926 - Posted: 20 Oct 2011, 15:26:30 UTC - in response to Message 1163909.  

Well no, Chris, light years is a measure of distance. A light year is the distance light travels in one year.
Tullio


This is only valid if you consider that C is constant. There are now cientists who are challenging this.

If it's proven that the speed of light is not a constant, then all modern physics have to be revised.
ID: 1163926 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 1163932 - Posted: 20 Oct 2011, 15:46:02 UTC - in response to Message 1163926.  


This is only valid if you consider that C is constant. There are now scientists who are challenging this.

If it's proven that the speed of light is not a constant, then all modern physics have to be revised.

Yes, I know. But the neutrino result must still be checked and rechecked. Too many physical theories, not only relativity, depend on a constant speed of light. If c is not a constant also e and h must change in value.
Tullio
ID: 1163932 · Report as offensive
Profile Johnney Guinness
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 06
Posts: 3093
Credit: 2,652,287
RAC: 0
Ireland
Message 1164310 - Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 19:31:39 UTC - in response to Message 1163926.  

Well no, Chris, light years is a measure of distance. A light year is the distance light travels in one year.
Tullio


This is only valid if you consider that C is constant. There are now cientists who are challenging this.

If it's proven that the speed of light is not a constant, then all modern physics have to be revised.

Dr Imaginario,
You hit the nail on the head there. Thats exactly whats going to happen!. And just as you say, all modern physics have to be revised. Thats exactly whats going to happen! Its will effect hugh areas of science. I have been trying to tell this to people here for the last few months and nobody seems to be able to grasp the concept. Either way, its going to happen. God told me......but people don't seem to believe that either! (Not sure why?)

John.
ID: 1164310 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 21209
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 1164334 - Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 20:13:50 UTC - in response to Message 1164316.  

Well no, Chris, ...


OK, hold my hand up, you are quite correct. Oooops ....


Welcome to the first step of enlightenment!

You'll make a good scientist yet. ;-)


(Forgot what politician it was who exclaimed that he couldn't hold a position meeting with scientists because they might change their minds when presented with new data!)

Best wishes,
Martin


See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 1164334 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 31006
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1164340 - Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 20:26:13 UTC

There is no duration, there is only distance.

ID: 1164340 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 1164404 - Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 1:44:52 UTC - in response to Message 1164340.  

There is no duration, there is only distance.


So from the moment the Big Bang happened to it's theorized ending, what do you call that?
ID: 1164404 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 31006
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1164429 - Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 4:03:31 UTC - in response to Message 1164404.  

There is no duration, there is only distance.


So from the moment the Big Bang happened to it's theorized ending, what do you call that?


Distance. The distance from the big bang. Remember all the units on the 4 dimensional thing we experience have to be the same. So if x, y and z are meters, so is t.



ID: 1164429 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 1164435 - Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 4:18:37 UTC - in response to Message 1164429.  

There is no duration, there is only distance.


So from the moment the Big Bang happened to it's theorized ending, what do you call that?


Distance. The distance from the big bang. Remember all the units on the 4 dimensional thing we experience have to be the same. So if x, y and z are meters, so is t.


Distance isn't a moment. Duration is the moments from the start to the finish, not from end to end.
ID: 1164435 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 31006
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1164439 - Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 5:32:50 UTC - in response to Message 1164435.  

There is no duration, there is only distance.


So from the moment the Big Bang happened to it's theorized ending, what do you call that?


Distance. The distance from the big bang. Remember all the units on the 4 dimensional thing we experience have to be the same. So if x, y and z are meters, so is t.


Distance isn't a moment. Duration is the moments from the start to the finish, not from end to end.

There is only distance. The second you think of is about 3e8 meters in a direction perpendicular to x, y and z.

ID: 1164439 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 1164441 - Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 5:39:55 UTC - in response to Message 1164439.  

There is only distance. The second you think of is about 3e8 meters in a direction perpendicular to x, y and z.


Duration allows objects to travel distance. Without duration, there would be no way to move from one point to another.
ID: 1164441 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1164458 - Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 10:03:17 UTC - in response to Message 1164439.  

Time is an illusion by which we order events in our lives. It can be measured however as distance/velocity. The rub is that velocity is distance/time

So that you get time = time : or zero=zero Maybe a profound tautology. ??

Time=distance doesn't seem to fall out of the Math.
ID: 1164458 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 31006
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1164495 - Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 15:01:20 UTC - in response to Message 1164458.  

Time is an illusion by which we order events in our lives. It can be measured however as distance/velocity. The rub is that velocity is distance/time

So that you get time = time : or zero=zero Maybe a profound tautology. ??

Time=distance doesn't seem to fall out of the Math.

Yes. Time falls out and distance is all that is left.

You don't even need tensors of GR to see this it happens in SR. When you look at the equations everywhere you have time/time. That falls out. All you are left with is distance.

ID: 1164495 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 21209
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 1164655 - Posted: 23 Oct 2011, 0:24:10 UTC - in response to Message 1164580.  
Last modified: 23 Oct 2011, 0:24:55 UTC

Note that we have no definition of time other than by the assumed time dependant action of atomic oscillations or other repetitive real-world actions.

As Einstein has aptly noted: Time is that which is measured by the ticking of a 'clock'.

Or, more philosophically: Time passes.

Keep searchin',
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 1164655 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1164674 - Posted: 23 Oct 2011, 2:07:18 UTC - in response to Message 1164655.  

Time is the interval between events determined by so many cycles of some recurrent, even, stable process.
ID: 1164674 · Report as offensive
Profile Dr Imaginario

Send message
Joined: 10 Aug 11
Posts: 172
Credit: 22,735
RAC: 0
Portugal
Message 1164735 - Posted: 23 Oct 2011, 10:34:10 UTC

so basically time is an ilusion created by man to explain the interval between two or several events or the duration of an event.

At the end is only a ilusion created by a conscient mind, as the universe as no notion of it.
ID: 1164735 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 1164777 - Posted: 23 Oct 2011, 15:47:25 UTC - in response to Message 1164735.  

No, time is not an illusion created by man. Time is duration, from the beginning of our universe to it's end. We simply put a unit of measure on it to keep track of the duration of events.

Duration would happen with or without mankind.
ID: 1164777 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 31006
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1164791 - Posted: 23 Oct 2011, 17:16:38 UTC

Time is a unitless thing invented by man because the true units, distance, are too big for his small brain to grasp.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity
SR uses a 'flat' 4-dimensional Minkowski space, which is an example of a space-time. This space, however, is very similar to the standard 3 dimensional Euclidean space.
The differential of distance (ds) in cartesian 3D space is defined as:

where (dx1,dx2,dx3) are the differentials of the three spatial dimensions. In the geometry of special relativity, a fourth dimension is added, derived from time, so that the equation for the differential of distance becomes:

Note the units of the added term, the "time" one. It is "(distance / time) * time" which reduces to distance.

Ergo: Time is distance.

Sorry to break your 3D bubble.

ID: 1164791 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · Next

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Einstein was wrong?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.