Message boards :
Science (non-SETI) :
LHC Lawsuit
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Scarecrow Send message Joined: 15 Jul 00 Posts: 4520 Credit: 486,601 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Full story here (msnbc) Interestingly, the LHC/BOINC Project has been "down for maintenance" for the past several hours. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21804 Credit: 2,815,091 RAC: 0 ![]() |
"The builders of the world's biggest particle collider are being sued in federal court over fears that the experiment might create globe-gobbling black holes or never-before-seen strains of matter that would destroy the planet." And they just now thought of that? Interestingly, the LHC/BOINC Project has been "down for maintenance" for the past several hours. Be ready for the credit-gobbling black hole that might come of this. me@rescam.org |
Scarecrow Send message Joined: 15 Jul 00 Posts: 4520 Credit: 486,601 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Here's a couple more related links..... lhcconcerns.com (contains documents relating to the lawsuit) CERN's Site on Safety |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Nov 07 Posts: 4752 Credit: 258,845 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 2 Jan 08 Posts: 593 Credit: 68,282 RAC: 0 ![]() |
'The stem of the arguement' and thats not neccessary. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 22 Nov 01 Posts: 1904 Credit: 2,646,654 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Direct off this web site. Microscopic black holes will not eat you... Massive black holes are created in the Universe by the collapse of massive stars, which contain enormous amounts of gravitational energy that pulls in surrounding matter. The gravitational pull of a black hole is related to the amount of matter or energy it contains – the less there is, the weaker the pull. Some physicists suggest that microscopic black holes could be produced in the collisions at the LHC. However, these would only be created with the energies of the colliding particles (equivalent to the energies of mosquitoes), so no microscopic black holes produced inside the LHC could generate a strong enough gravitational force to pull in surrounding matter. If the LHC can produce microscopic black holes, cosmic rays of much higher energies would already have produced many more. Since the Earth is still here, there is no reason to believe that collisions inside the LHC are harmful. Black holes lose matter through the emission of energy via a process discovered by Stephen Hawking. Any black hole that cannot attract matter, such as those that might be produced at the LHC, will shrink, evaporate and disappear. The smaller the black hole, the faster it vanishes. If microscopic black holes were to be found at the LHC, they would exist only for a fleeting moment. They would be so short-lived that the only way they could be detected would be by detecting the products of their decay. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Nov 07 Posts: 4752 Credit: 258,845 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Very true
While this is true, it still takes a very large amount of time for a black hole to evaporate. If you follow the equations for Hawking radiation: ![]() You will find that it takes a black hole with a mass of one solar mass unit 10^67 years to fully "evaporate". Even with the lengths of times required for the black hole to evaporate I do not think that the micro black holes could ever pose a problem to us. Like you said earlier, with the energies we are dealing with we would have already encountered problems from naturally occurring black holes. ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 22 Nov 01 Posts: 1904 Credit: 2,646,654 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Yes, but we're not talking about solar mass black holes at the LHC are we! They might be creating black holes with the mass of a proton or a two and that's about it....in the overall scheme of things they wouldn't be large enough to suck in a nearby electron! Do the math...they will evaporate before you can blink! |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 11 Jun 04 Posts: 148 Credit: 504,219 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Well - the math appears right, (Lord knows, it's been a while since I've done equations like that) but the website is still down. I did receive several WU's earlier this morning though ... guess there's still life. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 2 Jan 08 Posts: 593 Credit: 68,282 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Perhaps there having difficulty with funding. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21804 Credit: 2,815,091 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Scientists bet doomsday is a long shot me@rescam.org |
Kathy ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Jan 03 Posts: 338 Credit: 27,877,436 RAC: 0 ![]() |
"The builders of the world's biggest particle collider are being sued in federal court over fears that the experiment might create globe-gobbling black holes or never-before-seen strains of matter that would destroy the planet." Thanks so much for reminding me of the project, I just attached! |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0 ![]() |
As far as I understand it..if the theory is correct that black holes will even be created in the first place, then you have to accept the theory that they will evaporate too quickly to cause any harm because they are both the same theory. I hope that is clearer than it appears to be. Reality Internet Personality |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Nov 07 Posts: 4752 Credit: 258,845 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Very true. You will have to forgive me, my mind works slowly at times! Sorry about the long pause, It has been awhile since i've looked at this thread. ![]() ![]() |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.