So whats the official word on lack of credits?

Message boards : Number crunching : So whats the official word on lack of credits?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Prototype
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 67
Credit: 497,118
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 16433 - Posted: 22 Aug 2004, 20:07:23 UTC

Well, any good reason why we are being kept in the dark regarding the fact no-ones credit have been updated for atleast 2 week (and probably more like a month for some)?

Please keep us informed, thats the least you can do.

--
Join SIT@HOME, you too can sit there watching that expensive PC sit there doing nothing. Marvel at the fact the room is 5 degrees cooler than when your PC was running SETI@HOME.

SIT@HOME -- The new project!
ID: 16433 · Report as offensive
Heffed
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Mar 02
Posts: 1856
Credit: 40,736
RAC: 0
United States
Message 16437 - Posted: 22 Aug 2004, 20:20:13 UTC

With all the various problems they have been reporting, I would think your question is moot.

The system keeps going down.... Any reason to believe that the validators and whatever else responsible for granting credits also aren't going down?

<a> [/url]
ID: 16437 · Report as offensive
Petit Soleil
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 03
Posts: 1497
Credit: 70,934
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 16441 - Posted: 22 Aug 2004, 20:36:31 UTC

What's really annoying is they won't post official news about that.
They reads our posts, they know how concerned we are about this but
they won't take a minute to keep us informed.

Is there anyone stearing the ship ?
WHO IS IN CHARGE HERE ????

I say it again WAKE UP SETI !!!!!

-.-. --.- -.. -..- . - .-.-. -.- --... ...--
ID: 16441 · Report as offensive
Profile mlcudd
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Apr 03
Posts: 782
Credit: 63,647
RAC: 0
United States
Message 16442 - Posted: 22 Aug 2004, 20:42:09 UTC
Last modified: 22 Aug 2004, 20:43:47 UTC

Hi All,
I recall that it was stated that they were working to get the ALPHA/Beta programs working and the Public project up by Monday. They never made a statement as to bringing the Validators online. I think that "retaining" the inforamtion to send to the validator has been the priority. I think everyone that has tried, has received WU's by now, and most are getting successful hits on the schedualer. I think that this is very promising considering the past failures. I believe that they are making sure that the "Inforamtion " side of the program is working as described before moving to the "Result" side. I think all would agree that this is probably a smart thing. As for past credit, we know that we have lost a significant amount. That is all water under the bridge at this point. With the project just getting back off the ground in the last couple of days, all the "lost" WU's have been recycled and are awaiting validation. I would imagine that if thinks continue to prgress in a positive manner, that we will begin to see credits sometime at the end of this coming week. We have all waited a long time, we just have to give it a little more time to see exactly where we stand.

Happy Crunching To All.
Keep Your Chins Up.

Regards,

Rocky


And yes I agree, the most annoying part is that we are not informed, whether "Official" or "Unofficial"

ID: 16442 · Report as offensive
Ingleside
Volunteer developer

Send message
Joined: 4 Feb 03
Posts: 1546
Credit: 15,832,022
RAC: 13
Norway
Message 16467 - Posted: 22 Aug 2004, 22:41:07 UTC

Well, going to the front-page and reading the news, the last posted about then to get credit is:

1; Credit for the backlog of results will start being granted once we move to the Snap Appliance and turn on the hierarchical directory structure.
2; We developed a hierarchical directory structure to get around the big directory problem. (snip) It is being tested in alpha now. Next week it will go to beta and then to public.


While "live" has been down the last weeks, so has alpha & beta, so they still haven't had the opportunity to beta-test the new code. Alpha is now up and running again, while beta haven't been up since June...

AFAIK they can't start the validation on only new results, but have to wait for the directory structure being implemented.
ID: 16467 · Report as offensive
Profile bfarrant
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jun 99
Posts: 228
Credit: 3,559,381
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 16469 - Posted: 22 Aug 2004, 22:58:43 UTC - in response to Message 16433.  


> Join SIT@HOME, you too can sit there watching that expensive PC sit there
> doing nothing. Marvel at the fact the room is 5 degrees cooler than when your
> PC was running SETI@HOME.
>
> SIT@HOME -- The new project!


Actually, I'm running SIT@HOME - it's a wonderful project. It uses the shear brute power of distributed computing to analyze the hundreds of TV channels now available to try and find if there is ANYTHING good on. Positive results sent back to the project are forwarded to another another new DC project called WATCH@HOME whose members computers try to analyze the positive results, organize a schedule and decode the channel symbols in the TV guide.



ID: 16469 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : So whats the official word on lack of credits?


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.