Extracted from the "Call for forum changes" thread.

C'mon Siran. I'm not attacking you or anyone else; that doesn't mean we have to agree on everything. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. In discussions we present our opinions and our reasons why.

You're NOT? What do you call telling most people [including me] that they are wrong on everything? What do you call issuing snide remarks at every post you reply to? Entitled to an opinion, yes. Agree to disagree, yes. Entitled to adamantly tell people they are wrong when they are usually right, no. See below about "reasons".

Well, I actually believed I had you on your statement above. But, alas, I was wrong. However, my statements was for reference only and in no way confirming any other suggestion. I reread the post I made my reference from and yes, there was no suggestion about giving credit for a plus rating. However, I will prove you wrong in that the original suggestion did NOT say anything about taking credits for both a plus or a minus rating.

I only made my comment to clarify. You had said "Credit whores could go through and + every single post increasing their credits dramatically." Which, of course, was not the original suggestion. Which, of course, is why I didn't quote the original suggestion.

Oh, and then you always come up with some off-the-wall excuse why you're not wrong and others are. You're statements above proves that. It also proves that you have a hard time comprehending what others say. Did you happen to read the words ".... for reference only and in no way confiming....", in my response to you? No? I didn't think so....

Read it and weep kiddo....

Nothing to weep about.

Ahh! You're just not going to admit that you were wrong and I was right, on this, are you? Hmmmm....

You are NOT always right, as you claim to be....

For this to be valid, you would have to quote where I claimed to be always right. I've never said I'm always right.

Quote schmote! I don't have to quote anything to make my above statement valid. Read your own post history. By always telling others they are always wrong, you are insinuating that you are always right.

Also, please note that I am big enough to admit when I am wrong. How about you.....?

I'm wrong all the time. I don't have a lock on the truth, which is why I present my reasons.

Upon reading you posts, I have seen no indication of you ever admitting that you are wrong, let alone wrong all the time. "Truth" will win out, always. You don't give reasons, you give excuses because you can't reason that maybe someone is right while you are wrong....

Happy BOINCing.... (-:< >:-)

---

CAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr - L L & P _\\//
Winders 11 OS? "What a piece of junk!" - L. Skywalker
"Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide." - T'Plana-hath

Most people who rush to rash judgements, usually just end up with well, a rash.

OTOH, actually worrying about the content of this board and what others think of you here could become a task for a full-time staff of twelve working sixty-hour weeks, assuming you had the capital to fund such a venture (look at Donald Trump, for instance, who DOES have a staff of twelve looking after his image).

I say, give 'em a mule, because every ass loves company...

---

Stewie: So, is there any tread left on the tires? Or at this point would it be like throwing a hot dog down a hallway?

Fox Sunday (US) at 9PM ET/PT

Extracted from the "Call for forum changes" thread.

C'mon Siran. I'm not attacking you or anyone else; that doesn't mean we have to agree on everything. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. In discussions we present our opinions and our reasons why.

You're NOT? What do you call telling most people [including me] that they are wrong on everything? What do you call issuing snide remarks at every post you reply to? Entitled to an opinion, yes. Agree to disagree, yes. Entitled to adamantly tell people they are wrong when they are usually right, no. See below about "reasons".

Well, I actually believed I had you on your statement above. But, alas, I was wrong. However, my statements was for reference only and in no way confirming any other suggestion. I reread the post I made my reference from and yes, there was no suggestion about giving credit for a plus rating. However, I will prove you wrong in that the original suggestion did NOT say anything about taking credits for both a plus or a minus rating.

I only made my comment to clarify. You had said "Credit whores could go through and + every single post increasing their credits dramatically." Which, of course, was not the original suggestion. Which, of course, is why I didn't quote the original suggestion.

Oh, and then you always come up with some off-the-wall excuse why you're not wrong and others are. You're statements above proves that. It also proves that you have a hard time comprehending what others say. Did you happen to read the words ".... for reference only and in no way confiming....", in my response to you? No? I didn't think so....

Read it and weep kiddo....

Nothing to weep about.

Ahh! You're just not going to admit that you were wrong and I was right, on this, are you? Hmmmm....

You are NOT always right, as you claim to be....

For this to be valid, you would have to quote where I claimed to be always right. I've never said I'm always right.

Quote schmote! I don't have to quote anything to make my above statement valid. Read your own post history. By always telling others they are always wrong, you are insinuating that you are always right.

Also, please note that I am big enough to admit when I am wrong. How about you.....?

I'm wrong all the time. I don't have a lock on the truth, which is why I present my reasons.

Upon reading you posts, I have seen no indication of you ever admitting that you are wrong, let alone wrong all the time. "Truth" will win out, always. You don't give reasons, you give excuses because you can't reason that maybe someone is right while you are wrong....

Once again, I think I'll just let this stand on it's own. You used the word "claim," not I.

---

Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...

Oh, and by the way:

The original title to this thread is/was "**** Rash Judgements ****."

Siran, the word you are looking for is "judgments." Without the "e."

Since recently you wanted to "be of some assistance here," and "correct [my] grammar," I thought I would return the favor and correct your spelling.

'Nuff said.

---

Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...

And yet you failed to see Rash = Rush. ::shame shame::

Siran, the word you are looking for is "judgments." Without the "e."

It can go both. Pick up a dictionary and see things like judg·ment also judge·ment ..

---

Interesting this is, Siran. My wife mentioned this Lamebaugh guy and had the same exact opinion of him. Coincidence?

-Mr. anon

Wow, a whole thread just to flame one person! Rush, you should be flattered. Let me think of something bad to say about you..erm..ok..got it.

Rush. You're wrong about everything and never admit it. Oh wait, you know I already think that about you anyway. ;-)

Well enjoy your thread. :-)

---

Reality Internet Personality