Questions and Answers :
Getting started :
credit for work done
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Ben Adar Send message Joined: 2 Dec 01 Posts: 6 Credit: 161,561 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Does anyone of you know when credit for processed Workunits will be added to stats page. My PC processed several workunits and the credits are still pending. Murphy say's complex systems cause complex error's and simple systems cause complex error's |
![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 ![]() |
It takes 3 computers to crunch one workunit and send the results back plus have the RPC scheduler authenticate the units. There are still a couple of bugs in the database, but if your units are the ones in the list, you should wait for another 2 computers to crunch this unit and send the results back. The middle amount of the 3 claimed credits will be granted to all 3 computers. I just went quickly through your list of returned work units. If you look at this unit for instance, you see that one other computer has returned it yet. Both of you have to wait for a 3rd computer to send the data back. Hope this helps. Take a look at the Unofficial FAQ for more info. ---------------------- Jordâ„¢ [url=http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&userid=41965] ![]() |
Ben Adar Send message Joined: 2 Dec 01 Posts: 6 Credit: 161,561 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Yes, it helped thanks. But i must say, i don't like the middle amount thing. If i look at this particular workunit, the other computer seems to be a little cluster or something like that. It only needed 2% of the time my PC needed to crunch this WU and therefore it only claims a very little credit. ------------------------------------------------- Murphy say's complex systems cause complex error's and simple systems cause complex error's |
![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 ![]() |
The unit in question that I used as an example was giving out an error on the other machine: SETI@Home Informational message -9 result_overflow NOTE: The number of results detected exceeds the storage space allocated. This is BOINC saying that this computer thought it was a noisy unit. The amount of spikes, pulses and gaussians encountered in the first minute was too much for this machine to handle, so it sent the unit back to Seti@Home. If you want, you can use this unit as an example instead. ;) ---------------------- Jordâ„¢ [url=http://www.boinc.dk/index.php?page=user_statistics&userid=41965] ![]() |
Ben Adar Send message Joined: 2 Dec 01 Posts: 6 Credit: 161,561 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Ok, that's better ;) . I was a little confused cause the workunitpage quoted "outcome: success". ------------------------------------------------- Murphy say's complex systems cause complex error's and simple systems cause complex error's |
Heffed Send message Joined: 19 Mar 02 Posts: 1856 Credit: 40,736 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> Ok, that's better ;) . > I was a little confused cause the workunitpage quoted "outcome: success". No, you will see "outcome: success" with a -9 overflow, as it is not an error. It simply means that in order to process all the data in the WU, the resulting output file would be too large. |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.