Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimized windows clients - plz help listing cpu times
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
James Nelson ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Mar 02 Posts: 381 Credit: 4,806,382 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Hi all, WOW what a diffrence went from just over 3 Hr average to under 2 Hr 15 Min on a AMD XP 2800+ Thanks for the link to get the optomized client, clear concise directions on how to install really helps. ![]() |
Don Erway Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 305 Credit: 471,946 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Host mycroft: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1152608 MSI K8N Neo2 (Chipset nVidia nForce3 250 rev. A1) AMD Athlon64 3200, venice core, sse3 support, 512k/800 Core speed 2.5 GHz (10x250 MHz HTT speed) Mem speed dual channel DDR400 running 208 MHz 2-3-3-6-1T Win2k-sp4+. The Athlon64's are trivial to overclock! Just up the core voltage 10%, and this is just using the stock, AMD retail box cooler, which doesn't even run at full speed, to keep the temp below 50 C. Anyway here are comparitive results: Yaoscw-w-r7: 4826.578125 Yaoscw-w-r8.1: 5334.922903 Yaoscw-P-r8.1 will not run. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 Jul 99 Posts: 335 Credit: 1,178,138 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Hi all, Always nice to see happy faces. :) Still haven't got the standard 4.18 app to benchmark though.. anyone? :) Greetings, Speedy67 ![]() ![]() |
Don Erway Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 305 Credit: 471,946 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Another happy face here too, of course! I would send you the 4.18 client, but I too lost track of it, and don't have a copy left. It might even be nice to put on your web site, and let folks benchmark with it, as well. Don |
Heffed Send message Joined: 19 Mar 02 Posts: 1856 Credit: 40,736 RAC: 0 ![]() |
But hey, has anyone tried memtest86, on an athlon64 machine? Mine won't even start to run. Haven't run Memtest86, but I've run Memtest86+ on my FX-53. No problems. |
James Nelson ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Mar 02 Posts: 381 Credit: 4,806,382 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Hi all, sorry checked my folder and 4.18 is gone now ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jan 00 Posts: 2562 Credit: 12,301,681 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Speedy Not sure if you still need it but 4.18 UCB Client Remove the .zip at the end and it should run fine... Funny I am paying for hosting and they do not let me place what I want for download without hassles.... LOL R/ Al
Please consider a Donation to the Seti Project. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 Jul 99 Posts: 335 Credit: 1,178,138 RAC: 0 ![]() |
It's the first Venice in the reference list, and it has a big difference between the r7 and r8.1 clients. The Winchesters only have a difference of about 125 seconds. I'm curious if my upcoming new server-machine (Athlon64 Venice 3000+) gives the same picture. Thanks for your input, I added it to the list. Greetings, Sander ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 Jul 99 Posts: 335 Credit: 1,178,138 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Speedy Thanks! I will add it to the website later this evening. Greetings, Sander P.S. Is there a way to make it run without the screensaver thingy? ![]() ![]() |
Don Erway Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 305 Credit: 471,946 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Just don't let it add to your screensavers. Just blank screen, for screen saver. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 Jul 99 Posts: 335 Credit: 1,178,138 RAC: 0 ![]() |
No I meant with just the 4.18 client and the reference unit in a seperate folder it runs in standalone-mode, but still opens a window with the screensaver thingy. I can imagine that has negative influence on the cpu-time. Greetings, Sander ![]() ![]() |
Don Erway Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 305 Credit: 471,946 RAC: 0 ![]() |
-nogui or maybe --nogui |
Urs Echternacht ![]() Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 692 Credit: 135,197,781 RAC: 211 ![]() ![]() |
Just tried, -nogui works. _\|/_ U r s |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 Jul 99 Posts: 335 Credit: 1,178,138 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
Don Erway Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 305 Credit: 471,946 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Since you pointed out the variation with the venice core results, I re-ran the Yaoscw-w-r8.1, and got: 4851.671875 Much more in line with others. I guess I had some other stuff running, the first time I ran it, or something..?? More swapping eating up time. I dunno. Anyway, you should fix the data on web site. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 Jul 99 Posts: 335 Credit: 1,178,138 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Since you pointed out the variation with the venice core results, I re-ran the Yaoscw-w-r8.1, and got: Ow... just when I thought I stumbled across something interesting. :) I updated the website, thanks for the update. Greetings, Sander ![]() ![]() |
Urs Echternacht ![]() Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 692 Credit: 135,197,781 RAC: 211 ![]() ![]() |
CPU-Info: 2x Pentium III E 1100MHz (Coppermine-T) Instructions: MMX, SSE Core-Speed: 1097Mhz, Multiplier x11, FSB 99.7MHz L2 256KB RAM: 768MB PC100 2-2-2 Chipset: Intel BX crunching 1 unit at the same time, processor affinity: both (default) standard-4.18..: 22197 secs. seti-p3........: 25946 secs. YAOSCW-K-r7....: 22331 secs. YAOSCW-K-r8.1..: 21899 secs. crunching 2 units at the same time, processor affinity: both (default) YAOSCW-K-r8.1..: unit1 14289 secs.+ unit2 14209 secs. crunching 2 units at the same time, processor affinity: seperate YAOSCW-K-r8.1..: unit1 on cpu0 21033 secs.+ unit2 on cpu1 11464 secs. OS is W2KSP4+ _\|/_ U r s |
Urs Echternacht ![]() Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 692 Credit: 135,197,781 RAC: 211 ![]() ![]() |
double post _\|/_ U r s |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jan 00 Posts: 2562 Credit: 12,301,681 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Speedy I have not forced it yet... Thus I have no knowledge of the screen saver side.. R/ Al Speedy Please consider a Donation to the Seti Project. |
Don Erway Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 305 Credit: 471,946 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Host hal: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1161224 Shuttle SB51G X-PC - FB51 Mobo - i845ge chipset Intel P4 2.4GHz/512k/533 Northwood core, no sse3, no HT. Core speed 2.69 GHz = 18 x 149.4 MHz FSBspeed Mem single channel DDR400 running 187 MHz 2-3-3-7 Win2k-sp4+. Comparitive results: Yaoscw-n-r7: 6311 Yaoscw-n-r8.1: 6565 So, it looks like 9 times out of 10, the r7 release was better than the r8.1... Is this info getting back to Tetsuji? Don |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.