Message boards :
Number crunching :
Seti Beta
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 7 · 8 · 9 · 10
Author | Message |
---|---|
Timothy Maness ![]() Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 159 Credit: 4,929 RAC: 0 ![]() |
i think i'll be the only forum regular using the standard windows_x86 clients. <img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/stats.php?userID=567" /> <a href="http://boinc-doc.net/boinc-wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page">BOINC Wiki</a> <a href="http://www.tamaness.hostrocket.com/BOINC_team.html">Gideontech BOINC team!</a> |
![]() Send message Joined: 19 Jul 00 Posts: 3898 Credit: 1,158,042 RAC: 0 ![]() |
i think i'll be the only forum regular using the standard windows_x86 clients. No, so far I have never gotten the optimized clients to work right yet, it seems such a waste when I start to blow through work units that just abend, and the time it takes to fiddle around with it is just way too annoying, at least for me ... I know, it is supposed to be easy ... I just have not managed the trick of it ... Maybe, we need the optimizers to build a tool that will be good enough to download the right version and drop it into place ... |
karthwyne ![]() Send message Joined: 24 May 99 Posts: 218 Credit: 5,750,702 RAC: 0 ![]() |
i can't build an installer, but: here is an app_info.xml i used so as not to error out all WUs (i still managed to do so before i edited the file...) this is for SETI BETA!!!! not for here at regular seti! [app_info] [app] [name]setiathome_enhanced[/name] [/app] [file_info] [name]setiathome_4.11_windows_intelx86.exe[/name] [executable/] [/file_info] [app_version] [app_name]setiathome_enhanced[/app_name] [version_num]411[/version_num] [file_ref] [file_name]setiathome_4.11_windows_intelx86.exe[/file_name] [main_program/] [/file_ref] [/app_version] [app] [name]setiathome[/name] [/app] [file_info] [name]setiathome_4.00_windows_intelx86.exe[/name] [executable/] [/file_info] [app_version] [app_name]setiathome_enhanced[/app_name] [version_num]400[/version_num] [file_ref] [file_name]setiathome_4.11_windows_intelx86.exe[/file_name] [main_program/] [/file_ref] [/app_version] [/app_info] you can also download from http://www.karthwyne.com/app_info.xml (right click, save as..) those hosting the clients please feel free to include the file, i make no claim to it. and as with all of this, Use at your own risk. [numerous edits to fix formatting] happy crunching Micah ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21804 Credit: 2,815,091 RAC: 0 ![]() |
No, so far I have never gotten the optimized clients to work right yet, it seems such a waste when I start to blow through work units that just abend, and the time it takes to fiddle around with it is just way too annoying, at least for me ... I just installed the -N version yesterday and it ran all night without any errors. :) me@rescam.org |
JohnB175 Send message Joined: 15 Oct 03 Posts: 124 Credit: 321,769 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Just wanted to give some numbers in case anyone was curious: P4 3.6 Prescott HT using "osecw-P" went from 14,500 avg to 5,200 avg P4 3.0 Nortwood HT using "osecw-N" went from 17,500 avg to 7,400 avg P4 1.8 Northwood non-HT using "osecw-N" went from 16,100 avg to 7,700 avg AMD Athlon XP 2500+ Barton using "osecw-K" went from 15,000 avg to 7,600 avg AMD Athlon 1000 using "osecw-0" went from 30,500 avg to 17,000 avg P3-800 using "osecw-K" went from 42,500 avg to 21,000 avg ***Note: This is not the reference units. This is looking at a trend in my account history *** Pretty impressive. Thanks TMR! |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Sep 99 Posts: 123 Credit: 7,443,272 RAC: 0 ![]() |
i have a amd64 3400 what is the best client for me ? currently using yaoscw-w-r7 thx guys ![]() |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.