Message boards :
Number crunching :
New Version
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 10 Feb 01 Posts: 196 Credit: 71,611 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Just grabbed the new copy and at first glance I'm not seeing any visible changes. Anybody know what was changed? And I guess for whenever Rom or another developer reads this, it would be nice to have a version history available so people could see what was actually being changed/fixed. Chris |
Angstrom Send message Joined: 20 Sep 99 Posts: 205 Credit: 10,131 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I agree - a version history would be good to have. I tried the BOINC site and couldnt find anything there either. Having said that the new version installed very nicely straight over the old one. Neil |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Oct 02 Posts: 494 Credit: 346,224 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Oct 02 Posts: 157 Credit: 871,078 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> I agree - a version history would be good to have. I tried the BOINC site and > couldnt find anything there either. > > Having said that the new version installed very nicely straight over the old > one. > > Neil > > I found install over old when on my XP machines, went without a hitch. However over on the Win98 machines, I did have to close the current BOINC CC to avoid an error. just my $0.02 <p> |
Angstrom Send message Joined: 20 Sep 99 Posts: 205 Credit: 10,131 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> I found install over old when on my XP machines, went without a hitch. However > over on the Win98 machines, I did have to close the current BOINC CC to avoid > an error. just my $0.02 I closed BOINC as well - sorry that wasnt clear in my earlier post. I wasnt brave enough to try with it up and running. Still, considering the problems there have been (granted mainly with SETI not BOINC)its quite refreshing to find the process trouble free. Neil |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 28 Apr 00 Posts: 579 Credit: 130,733 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Sorry for not responding sooner, here is a change list for stuff that shows up in the public project: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/boinc_public/checkin_notes (3.19 -> 3.20) Here is the change list for the development branch: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/boinc/checkin_notes (4.00 -> Current) Hope this helps... ----- Rom BOINC Development Team, U.C. Berkeley |
Angstrom Send message Joined: 20 Sep 99 Posts: 205 Credit: 10,131 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Thanks Rom |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4548 Credit: 35,667,570 RAC: 4 ![]() |
|
Guido_A_Waldenmeier_ Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 482 Credit: 4,774 RAC: 0 ![]() |
3.19 to 3.20 i can nothing see that change,time to crunch the same,stability the same can anybody tell us what is real change thx greetings guido ,nice weekend @ll Ich höre immer gerne zu,wenn ich auch nicht immer belehrt werden möchte ;-) |
Darren ![]() Send message Joined: 2 Jul 99 Posts: 259 Credit: 280,503 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> 3.19 to 3.20 > i can nothing see that change,time to crunch the same,stability the same > can anybody tell us what is real change thx Good morning, Guido. You can see the differences on this page - http://boinc.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/boinc_public/checkin_notes - if you go almost to the bottom and look where it says "Diffs between", then choose 3.19 in the top box and 3.20 in the bottom box, then click on "get diffs". And yes, not much changed for the cruncher - most of the changes are at Berkeley. |
Guido_A_Waldenmeier_ Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 482 Credit: 4,774 RAC: 0 ![]() |
thx darren Persönlich bin ich immer bereit zu lernen, obwohl ich nicht immer belehrt werden möchte.[/url] |
Daniel Schaalma ![]() Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 297 Credit: 16,953,703 RAC: 0 ![]() |
When installing 3.20 over 3.19, has anybody lost any work units or credit? Since the last time when Berkeley suggested that we unattach and re-attach to the project, I ended up loosing all the WUs in my cache, as well as 2 that were almost finished. I also lost my original host number for that machine. Thanks. Regards, Daniel. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3083 Credit: 150,096 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> When installing 3.20 over 3.19, has anybody lost any work units or credit? > Since the last time when Berkeley suggested that we unattach and re-attach to > the project, I ended up loosing all the WUs in my cache, as well as 2 that > were almost finished. I also lost my original host number for that machine. > Thanks. When you make an upgrade of the Boinc software, there is no need to detach and re-attach. The only thing to do is overwrite the existing software. I do it after I closed the running client and had no problem at all. By doing like this, you do not loose any WU's. Greetings from Belgium. |
Guido_A_Waldenmeier_ Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 482 Credit: 4,774 RAC: 0 ![]() |
When installing 3.20 over 3.19, has anybody lost any work units or credit? --------------- Answer are NO i have this make nothing goes wrong Persönlich bin ich immer bereit zu lernen, obwohl ich nicht immer belehrt werden möchte.[/url] |
Angstrom Send message Joined: 20 Sep 99 Posts: 205 Credit: 10,131 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> When you make an upgrade of the Boinc software, there is no need to detach and > re-attach. > The only thing to do is overwrite the existing software. I do it after I > closed the running client and had no problem at all. By doing like this, you > do not loose any WU's. I found the same just close the client then let the installer run. All the work units re-appeared in the new version and the WU that was partly completed just took up where it had left off. Neil |
SpaceFan2 Send message Joined: 18 Apr 01 Posts: 6 Credit: 78,135 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Same here! Just close the client and install over the old version. When you restart, it will continue working on the WUs it was working on before the install. |
canis lupus Send message Joined: 26 Oct 03 Posts: 154 Credit: 13,061 RAC: 0 |
> > I found the same just close the client then let the installer run. All the > work units re-appeared in the new version and the WU that was partly completed > just took up where it had left off. > > Neil > Claes Stefan reported in this post http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/forum_thread.php?id=1549 that it was not necessary to close the client when upgrading. Dont know if I would be brave enough to try that. :) -- <p>Regards, Paul - Just slowly BOINCing along...</p> |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 28 Apr 00 Posts: 579 Credit: 130,733 RAC: 0 ![]() |
The setup program closes down the client for you before actually installing files. ----- Rom BOINC Development Team, U.C. Berkeley |
Pascal, K G ![]() Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2343 Credit: 150,491 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I just suspended and installed and started crunching, worked like a charm... |
![]() Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 157 Credit: 10,720,947 RAC: 362 ![]() ![]() |
|
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.