Results recieved different between Classic S@H and Boinc account


Advanced search

Questions and Answers : Preferences : Results recieved different between Classic S@H and Boinc account
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Ken Switzer

Send message
Joined: 10 Sep 99
Posts: 7
Credit: 185,062
RAC: 0
United States
Message 718 - Posted: 23 Jun 2004, 17:48:14 UTC

When I look at my account statistics for results received for both classic and boinc there are about 5000 workunits missing
for the new. Will the database information be reconciled at some point? I did see a note that the database crashed yesterday and that some
data is missing, but this looks like a snapshot was taken of the classic database some time ago and not updated.
Thanks
kws

ID: 718 · Report as offensive
John McLeod VII
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 99
Posts: 24806
Credit: 790,712
RAC: 0
United States
Message 740 - Posted: 23 Jun 2004, 18:42:30 UTC

Yes, there was a snopshot taken sometime about May 15th. I am not certain, but I would not expect an update to the S@H1 data before the close of S@H1.
jm7
ID: 740 · Report as offensive
Urs Echternacht
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 692
Credit: 135,197,781
RAC: 211
Germany
Message 783 - Posted: 23 Jun 2004, 20:43:11 UTC - in response to Message 740.  

> Yes, there was a snopshot taken sometime about May 15th. I am not certain,
> but I would not expect an update to the S@H1 data before the close of S@H1.
> jm7
>

My private stats showing: results are from May 13th.



/
Urs
ID: 783 · Report as offensive
John McLeod VII
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 99
Posts: 24806
Credit: 790,712
RAC: 0
United States
Message 938 - Posted: 24 Jun 2004, 1:48:57 UTC - in response to Message 783.  

> > Yes, there was a snopshot taken sometime about May 15th. I am not
> certain,
> > but I would not expect an update to the S@H1 data before the close of
> S@H1.
> > jm7
> >
>
> My private stats showing: results are from May 13th.
>
Ok, then the update code took 2 days to run and create the accounts on S@H BOINC. What I was basing my date on was the creation date of the BOINC users.
jm7
ID: 938 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : Preferences : Results recieved different between Classic S@H and Boinc account


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.