Message boards :
Number crunching :
HOWLEY SMOWLEY!(Time till completion very high)
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 17 May 03 Posts: 7 Credit: 18,558 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I just got a WU which is planned for 80 HOURS of CPU time @ P-III 500 MHz(instead of 13 hours). thats an awful lot :P.. what are your 'record' scores of CPU time? |
Fred Robinson Send message Joined: 9 Sep 99 Posts: 1 Credit: 124,815 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I've noticed it too. But it seems like just the estimation mechanism is whacked -- my work units still take about as long as they did before. My home machine's estimates are hovering around 85-86 hours where it actually takes 13-14. Fred |
bobuk Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 11 Credit: 21,700 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> I just got a WU which is planned for 80 HOURS of CPU time @ P-III 500 > MHz(instead of 13 hours). thats an awful lot :P.. what are your 'record' > scores of CPU time? > i to have been getting long and longer times to take to complete from 2 hours to 30 hours ... but all take the same time to do ... so just another glych in the pot :) punto....aka Bobuk |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21804 Credit: 2,815,091 RAC: 0 ![]() |
This is becoming a well pronounced error. My estimated completion times, and it is only ESTIMATED, are just under 25 hours. However I'm still completing them in the normal time of 3 hours. |
![]() Send message Joined: 17 May 03 Posts: 7 Credit: 18,558 RAC: 0 ![]() |
ok, thank you for the replies, i understand it now :) |
Guido_A_Waldenmeier_ Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 482 Credit: 4,774 RAC: 0 ![]() |
on amd64 3000+ ~~~you need from 2 hours 10 min. to 2 hours 40 min. [/url] Ich höre immer gerne zu,wenn ich auch nicht immer belehrt werden möchte ;-) |
![]() Send message Joined: 17 May 03 Posts: 7 Credit: 18,558 RAC: 0 ![]() |
So? ;) |
Michael Flett Send message Joined: 22 Oct 03 Posts: 1 Credit: 2,069 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Sound like you folks definately have some kind of problem there. I get estimates of 3 hours and 47 minutes, with actual computation times of 3 hours 52 minutes on avereage. Do you have other processor-intensive tasks running that may be set to a higher priority than Seti? |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3083 Credit: 150,096 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> Sound like you folks definately have some kind of problem there. I get > estimates of 3 hours and 47 minutes, with actual computation times of 3 hours > 52 minutes on avereage. Do you have other processor-intensive tasks running > that may be set to a higher priority than Seti? There was indeed something strange: since a few days the estimated time was 6 time longer then normal. Berkeley made some changes some 2 days ago and on my PC, as well as on some other one, the very first one with "normal" estimated processing time came in around midnight UTC yesterday. Greetings from Belgium. |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.