HOWLEY SMOWLEY!(Time till completion very high)

Message boards : Number crunching : HOWLEY SMOWLEY!(Time till completion very high)
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile S@NL - Lieter

Send message
Joined: 17 May 03
Posts: 7
Credit: 18,558
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 7387 - Posted: 13 Jul 2004, 20:47:47 UTC

I just got a WU which is planned for 80 HOURS of CPU time @ P-III 500 MHz(instead of 13 hours). thats an awful lot :P.. what are your 'record' scores of CPU time?
ID: 7387 · Report as offensive
Fred Robinson

Send message
Joined: 9 Sep 99
Posts: 1
Credit: 124,815
RAC: 0
United States
Message 7422 - Posted: 13 Jul 2004, 23:16:44 UTC - in response to Message 7387.  

I've noticed it too. But it seems like just the estimation mechanism is whacked -- my work units still take about as long as they did before. My home machine's estimates are hovering around 85-86 hours where it actually takes 13-14.

Fred
ID: 7422 · Report as offensive
bobuk

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 11
Credit: 21,700
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 7460 - Posted: 14 Jul 2004, 0:51:10 UTC - in response to Message 7387.  

> I just got a WU which is planned for 80 HOURS of CPU time @ P-III 500
> MHz(instead of 13 hours). thats an awful lot :P.. what are your 'record'
> scores of CPU time?
>

i to have been getting long and longer times to take to complete from 2 hours to 30 hours ...
but all take the same time to do ...
so just another glych in the pot :)






punto....aka Bobuk
ID: 7460 · Report as offensive
Profile Misfit
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 01
Posts: 21804
Credit: 2,815,091
RAC: 0
United States
Message 7490 - Posted: 14 Jul 2004, 1:53:49 UTC
Last modified: 18 Jul 2004, 0:05:33 UTC

This is becoming a well pronounced error. My estimated completion times, and it is only ESTIMATED, are just under 25 hours. However I'm still completing them in the normal time of 3 hours.
ID: 7490 · Report as offensive
Profile S@NL - Lieter

Send message
Joined: 17 May 03
Posts: 7
Credit: 18,558
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 7904 - Posted: 14 Jul 2004, 18:28:37 UTC

ok, thank you for the replies, i understand it now :)
ID: 7904 · Report as offensive
Guido_A_Waldenmeier_

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 482
Credit: 4,774
RAC: 0
Liechtenstein
Message 7912 - Posted: 14 Jul 2004, 18:36:03 UTC

on amd64 3000+
~~~you need from 2 hours 10 min. to 2 hours 40 min.
[/url] [/url]

Ich höre immer gerne zu,wenn ich auch nicht immer belehrt werden möchte ;-)
ID: 7912 · Report as offensive
Profile S@NL - Lieter

Send message
Joined: 17 May 03
Posts: 7
Credit: 18,558
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 7989 - Posted: 14 Jul 2004, 20:09:17 UTC

So? ;)
ID: 7989 · Report as offensive
Michael Flett

Send message
Joined: 22 Oct 03
Posts: 1
Credit: 2,069
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 8752 - Posted: 16 Jul 2004, 16:15:47 UTC

Sound like you folks definately have some kind of problem there. I get estimates of 3 hours and 47 minutes, with actual computation times of 3 hours 52 minutes on avereage. Do you have other processor-intensive tasks running that may be set to a higher priority than Seti?
ID: 8752 · Report as offensive
Profile Thierry Van Driessche
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 02
Posts: 3083
Credit: 150,096
RAC: 0
Belgium
Message 8756 - Posted: 16 Jul 2004, 16:23:06 UTC - in response to Message 8752.  
Last modified: 20 Jul 2004, 12:02:40 UTC

> Sound like you folks definately have some kind of problem there. I get
> estimates of 3 hours and 47 minutes, with actual computation times of 3 hours
> 52 minutes on avereage. Do you have other processor-intensive tasks running
> that may be set to a higher priority than Seti?

There was indeed something strange: since a few days the estimated time was 6 time longer then normal.
Berkeley made some changes some 2 days ago and on my PC, as well as on some other one, the very first one with "normal" estimated processing time came in around midnight UTC yesterday.

Greetings from Belgium.
ID: 8756 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : HOWLEY SMOWLEY!(Time till completion very high)


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.