Message boards :
Number crunching :
Lost WUs - detaching & (re) attaching to BOINC ???
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 14 Credit: 524,325 RAC: 12 ![]() ![]() |
Hello world, I was wondering if this happened to anyone else? I read on the project homepage: >July 8, 2004 >We have moved the scheduling server to another >machine in order to free up CPU and memory for the >DB server. Active clients will fail 10 times to >connect to the old scheduling server and then will >self correct by contacting the master URL. To force >the correction right away, simply detach and then(re)>attach the project. So I did just that; detach and then (re)attach to the project... Stupid me, all the WUs I had crunched already (but were not uploaded yet due to the server outages at SETI) were gone and all the ones I had downloaded too :-( So please beware: following SETI instructions might not always be advisable... Anyway, at least we do get some status info from the guys at Berkeley again... :-) <a> |
Pascal, K G ![]() Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2343 Credit: 150,491 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Worked fine on both my units, did you reattach using http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/ ![]() |
TPR_Mojo Send message Joined: 18 Apr 00 Posts: 323 Credit: 7,001,052 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Unfortunately, unless you update the project before detaching you will lose completed work. Perhaps the message should be re-worded? |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 14 Credit: 524,325 RAC: 12 ![]() ![]() |
> Unfortunately, unless you update the project before detaching you will lose > completed work. Perhaps the message should be re-worded? > > Thanks Lowfield, I think they should re-word the message... Anyway, I'll be updating befor detaching in the future... :-) <a> |
Guido_A_Waldenmeier_ Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 482 Credit: 4,774 RAC: 0 ![]() |
OOPS [/url] |
Darren ![]() Send message Joined: 2 Jul 99 Posts: 259 Credit: 280,503 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> Worked fine on both my units, did you reattach using > http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/ But that's not the url you should be using. From the boinc news page: "June 22, 2004 The URL of this project is http://setiathome.berkeley.edu. If you joined using a different URL, please detach and attach to this URL." Prior to June 22, the correct url was the setiboinc url. Eventually, that url will simply stop working and you'll get no more work with no explanation of why - kind of like the old maggie url did during beta. That said, detaching will always cause you to lose any work still on your system. If you plan to detach, ideally, you should deplete all your work first. |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 14 Credit: 524,325 RAC: 12 ![]() ![]() |
Hi Darren, I did use http://setiathome.berkeley.edu but again, I should have updated first... MY FAULT... :-) Just trying to save others from making stupid mistakes... But I still think "they" should re-word the message on the homepage. <a> |
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
![]() Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 14 Credit: 524,325 RAC: 12 ![]() ![]() |
And on top of it all, when you detach, (re) attach to the project you get a new computer ID... This new ID can then be merged with the original one and you're left with the new ID. So my computer becomes 56116 after being 17445 for a while... This really starts to remind me of those days in May 1999... :-( Well, I think I'll just leave everything as it is, keep crunching and look at SETI again next month. Sh.. Good night everyone... :-) <a> |
Pascal, K G ![]() Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2343 Credit: 150,491 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> > Worked fine on both my units, did you reattach using > > http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/ > > But that's not the url you should be using. > > From the boinc news page: "June 22, 2004 The URL of this project is > http://setiathome.berkeley.edu. If you joined using a different URL, please > detach and attach to this URL." > > Prior to June 22, the correct url was the setiboinc url. Eventually, that url > will simply stop working and you'll get no more work with no explanation of > why - kind of like the old maggie url did during beta. > > That said, detaching will always cause you to lose any work still on your > system. If you plan to detach, ideally, you should deplete all your work > first. > > > ![]() |
STE\/E Send message Joined: 29 Mar 03 Posts: 1137 Credit: 5,334,063 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Detaching & reattaching to the Project has got to be the most Stupid Advice I have ever heard of. What about all the Wu's that will be dumped when people take this advice and then everybody's sitting around for the next 2 weeks wondering why they can't get no Wu's Verified. It will be because of this advice, thats why... I suggest you just manually update your PC or PC,s, thats what I did and it wasn't that big of a deal, I have a lot of WU's Cached and just didn't feel like dumping them so they would have to be reissued in 2 weeks ... |
STE\/E Send message Joined: 29 Mar 03 Posts: 1137 Credit: 5,334,063 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Another way that is safer to get through the 10 connections is to update and check the messages until you get a succeeded message. This will, however request work from some project just before the success. ========= Yes John, thats what I did, I figured it was better to do that then dump the Cached WU's I had and just let them sit around until the got reissuied... |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jun 99 Posts: 228 Credit: 3,559,381 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> Another way that is safer to get through the 10 connections is to update and > check the messages until you get a succeeded message. This will, however > request work from some project just before the success. > ========= > > Yes John, thats what I did, I figured it was better to do that then dump the > Cached WU's I had and just let them sit around until the got reissuied... > That's what I wanted to do.... But ever since the notice went up I haven't been able to update - all I get is : 2004-07-08 16:45:52 - Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi failed 2004-07-08 16:45:52 - No schedulers responded I was hoping the project was down, but I see the webpage is running. I've tried to update dozens of times and don't get through. I don't want to detach and re-attach, but if it doesn't get throguh in the next couple of hours I guess I will have to. |
![]() Send message Joined: 3 Jun 04 Posts: 28 Credit: 3,020 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Yeah detaching is catastrophic, and bad advice, it completely destroys your project directory, leaving you to download the client again, and a load of new WUs and reassigns your computer to a new host ID. |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 14 Credit: 524,325 RAC: 12 ![]() ![]() |
> Yeah detaching is catastrophic, and bad advice, it completely destroys your > project directory, leaving you to download the client again, and a load of new > WUs and reassigns your computer to a new host ID. > > Well, that's still what is says one should do on the project homepage... :-( I think Berkely is so busy trying to fix their servers they just don't have the time to read the forums and change things in time... Thanks anyway for all the great tips... better late than never :-) <a> |
Draenog Send message Joined: 27 Sep 03 Posts: 1 Credit: 61,947 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I am running on a Linux system. I was just looking at the client_state.xml file to try and figure out if there is a way to fool it into thinking that it has failed 10 times straight away. Maybe setting or to 10. Reason I am asking this is that I am on a dialup an don't want to lose all my current work, nor have to stay online for hours until it fails 10 times. Any ideas anyone? |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 1575 Credit: 4,152,111 RAC: 1 ![]() |
> Detaching & reattaching to the Project has got to be the most Stupid > Advice I have ever heard of. What about all the Wu's that will be dumped when > people take this advice and then everybody's sitting around for the next 2 > weeks wondering why they can't get no Wu's Verified. It will be because of > this advice, thats why... > > I suggest you just manually update your PC or PC,s, thats what I did and it > wasn't that big of a deal, I have a lot of WU's Cached and just didn't feel > like dumping them so they would have to be reissued in 2 weeks ... > It may seem a bit silly but it is the only way for anyone who is still attached to the setiboinc URL. Only if you are attached to http://setiathome.berkeley.edu you can update to get the new scheduler URL. John Keck BOINCing since 2002/12/08 |
Heffed Send message Joined: 19 Mar 02 Posts: 1856 Credit: 40,736 RAC: 0 ![]() |
> It may seem a bit silly but it is the only way for anyone who is still > attached to the setiboinc URL. Only if you are attached to > http://setiathome.berkeley.edu you can update to get the new scheduler URL. This is what I ran in to. Detaching was the only way to make it work. Not to mention my host ID in the low 3,000s. :( <a> |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 26 Credit: 26,660 RAC: 0 ![]() |
After you have lost your CS then you get this?!?!?!?! Why is the conection always failing????: --- - 2004-07-09 13:45:02 - Fewer active results than CPUs; requesting more work --- - 2004-07-09 13:45:08 - Fewer active results than CPUs; requesting more work http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/ - 2004-07-09 13:45:08 - Requesting 23466 seconds of work http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/ - 2004-07-09 13:45:08 - Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/ - 2004-07-09 13:45:11 - Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi failed http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/ - 2004-07-09 13:45:11 - No schedulers responded http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/ - 2004-07-09 13:45:11 - Deferring communication with project for 1 minutes and 0 seconds http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/ - 2004-07-09 13:46:11 - Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/ - 2004-07-09 13:46:14 - Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi failed http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/ - 2004-07-09 13:46:14 - No schedulers responded http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/ - 2004-07-09 13:46:14 - Deferring communication with project for 1 minutes and 0 seconds Is this a way to limited member to get more WU?????????? Come on Perople Give us the INFO remeber we are doing this for free, but that dosen't give you the right to give us the wrong advice and ignoring us!!! Please keep us informe all the time. not just sporadic... We are here for you!!!! but we need to hear from you!!! the Only RealBigSwede Come get your BOINC T-Shirt @ [url=http://www.t-shirt.here.ws]the RealBigSwede's T-shirt Place<a> |
Guido_A_Waldenmeier_ Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 482 Credit: 4,774 RAC: 0 ![]() |
[/url] |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.