Message boards :
News :
SETI@home v8 beta to begin on Tuesday
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 · 36 · 37 · 38 . . . 99 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 11 Dec 08 Posts: 198 Credit: 658,573 RAC: 0 ![]() |
[In a more serious answer to the question of working on the bigger issues] Since there is so much more to do, this year I'll try find if there is a way I can dedicate more time to SaH and other general tool development [Will involve taking less contract work, and still finding some means to feed myself and dog]. If I find a way, I'll let the other devs know how I went about it. Chaos: When the present determines the future, but the approximate present does not approximately determine the future. Edward Lorenz |
Send message Joined: 8 Sep 05 Posts: 82 Credit: 545,522 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Has this been covered? running MB V8's (just as on MB V7's) when the progress hits 82% the WU runs much faster ... (This was covered a long time ago ... I believe. But on my GPU ... running opencl_nvidia_sah ... 00-40% requires 4.5 sec/% progress 40-60% requires 3 sec/% progress 70%- requires 1 sec/% progress I.E. the speed increases starting sooner and grows ... Is this expected behavior?? Ed F |
Send message Joined: 11 Dec 08 Posts: 198 Credit: 658,573 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I.E. the speed increases starting sooner and grows ... Is this expected behavior?? Yeah processing changes its mix of searches depending on angle range of the task [, which chirp rate the app is up to], and each of the processing stages likely has different efficiency. Chaos: When the present determines the future, but the approximate present does not approximately determine the future. Edward Lorenz |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Aug 05 Posts: 2423 Credit: 15,878,738 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Final count for CUDA v8.00 apps: SETI@home v8 8.00 windows_intelx86 (cuda23) Number of tasks completed 540 Max tasks per day 612 Number of tasks today 0 Consecutive valid tasks 579 Average processing rate 135.22 GFLOPS Average turnaround time 0.27 days SETI@home v8 8.00 windows_intelx86 (cuda32) Number of tasks completed 118 Max tasks per day 152 Number of tasks today 0 Consecutive valid tasks 119 Average processing rate 92.41 GFLOPS Average turnaround time 0.56 days SETI@home v8 8.00 windows_intelx86 (cuda42) Number of tasks completed 47 Max tasks per day 83 Number of tasks today 0 Consecutive valid tasks 50 Average processing rate 73.79 GFLOPS Average turnaround time 0.60 days SETI@home v8 8.00 windows_intelx86 (cuda50) Number of tasks completed 61 Max tasks per day 96 Number of tasks today 0 Consecutive valid tasks 63 Average processing rate 84.84 GFLOPS Average turnaround time 0.60 days BOINC choice coincide with offline benchmarking this time. Will see what 8.01 gives. News about SETI opt app releases: https://twitter.com/Raistmer |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 10 Sep 13 Posts: 1187 Credit: 2,791,507 RAC: 0 ![]() |
All right, I haven't changed anything since I got the app_config working yesterday. When last we left my adventures, I was running two Beta tasks, each using 0.5 GPU. Right now, Boinc says it's running one Einstein using 0.5 GPU, and one Beta using 1.0 GPU. Total of 1.5 GPU. (Did I mention I only have one GPU in there?) W. T. F. ? ? ? (This is on the i7 with the 440. Beta host 66539.) David signature sent back to alpha testing |
![]() Send message Joined: 15 Mar 05 Posts: 1547 Credit: 27,183,456 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I think that like CPUs, BOINC truncates the number in use. So 1.5==1, 1.9999==1, 2.0==2. ![]() |
Send message Joined: 11 Dec 08 Posts: 198 Credit: 658,573 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I think that like CPUs, BOINC truncates the number in use. So 1.5==1, 1.9999==1, 2.0==2. And like files ;) Chaos: When the present determines the future, but the approximate present does not approximately determine the future. Edward Lorenz |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Apr 07 Posts: 1702 Credit: 4,622,751 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Upload issue 1/22/2016 9:52:32 PM | SETI@home Beta Test | Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jan 16 Posts: 51 Credit: 1,038,205 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Upload issue Had one of those a couple days ago. Finally had to nuke the job, as it became clear that https://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/result.php?resultid=22046064 would never upload. If I can help out by testing something, please let me know. Available hardware and software is listed in my profile here. |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Upload issue It's a long time since I saw one of those (years, I think), but I think it's a two-part error message. Error reported by file upload server: OK, what was it? can't open file And that second part actually comes from the local client: it's reported to the upload server, and the upload server reports it back down again. If it's a persistent error for a single task, look in the project directory to see if the file (the one ending in _1_0) is actually there - I think the cases I've seen have been when the uploadable file has been deleted prematurely. Then, you could search back through stdoutdae.txt for the main filename (06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253) to work out the whole life-cycle of that workunit. I think the chances are that you will find a successful upload in there somewhere, but for some reason BOINC (the local client) didn't update the task status properly. Maybe David (Anderson) could comment on that: findstr 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253 stdoutdae.txt would give him something to work on, since it's on one of your Windows machines. With extreme care, it is possible to edit client_state.xml to indicate that the upload has completed successfully, but it's simpler to just abort it and let somebody else have a go. |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
All right, I haven't changed anything since I got the app_config working yesterday. When last we left my adventures, I was running two Beta tasks, each using 0.5 GPU. Usually, that means that it's working on a Beta task which was downloaded before you put the app_config file into place, while you were still running tasks one at a time. When you 'read config files', the new setting goes into effect immediately, but the BOINC Manager display isn't updated for tasks already cached. It's only newly downloaded tasks (after app_config came into effect) which are correctly marked with '0.5 GPU' or whatever. That's another one for David Anderson. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 10 Sep 13 Posts: 1187 Credit: 2,791,507 RAC: 0 ![]() |
All right, I haven't changed anything since I got the app_config working yesterday. When last we left my adventures, I was running two Beta tasks, each using 0.5 GPU. Okay, that makes sense. David signature sent back to alpha testing |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Apr 07 Posts: 1702 Credit: 4,622,751 RAC: 0 ![]() |
File is present.Upload issue Then, you could search back through stdoutdae.txt for the main filename (06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253) to work out the whole life-cycle of that workunit. I think the chances are that you will find a successful upload in there somewhere, but for some reason BOINC (the local client) didn't update the task status properly. Maybe David (Anderson) could comment on that: 20-Jan-2016 16:57:35 [SETI@home Beta Test] Starting task 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1 20-Jan-2016 16:58:02 [SETI@home Beta Test] Computation for task 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1 finished 20-Jan-2016 17:13:07 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 17:15:08 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 17:15:08 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:57 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 17:23:19 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 17:25:20 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 17:25:20 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:24 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 17:47:43 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 17:49:43 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 17:49:43 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:15 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 17:59:32 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 18:01:33 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 18:01:33 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:03 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 18:17:40 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 18:19:41 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 18:19:41 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:53 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 18:24:02 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 18:26:03 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 18:26:03 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:48 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 18:58:25 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 19:00:27 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 19:00:27 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:44 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 19:16:36 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 19:18:37 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 19:18:37 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:55 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 19:54:44 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 19:56:45 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 19:56:45 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:18 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 19:58:46 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 20:00:47 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 20:00:47 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:03 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 20:08:59 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 20:11:01 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 20:11:01 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:26 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 20:17:02 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 20:19:03 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 20:19:03 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:18 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 20:43:26 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 20:45:27 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 20:45:27 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:13 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 21:03:31 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 21:05:32 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 21:05:32 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:54 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 21:28:01 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 21:30:02 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 21:30:02 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:09 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 21:38:04 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 21:40:05 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient HTTP error 20-Jan-2016 21:40:05 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:01:43 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:00 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 Note there is no message here about the result of the upload! 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:48 [SETI@home Beta Test] Error reported by file upload server: can't open file 20-Jan-2016 22:31:48 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient upload error 20-Jan-2016 22:31:48 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:02:28 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 Many more of the same block follow. Looking at the entire log this may explain what happened: 20-Jan-2016 22:31:00 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:01 [SETI@home Beta Test] Finished upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.251_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:01 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4566.8.42.68_0_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:03 [SETI@home] Finished download of 16ap11ab.32302.7429.14.41.178 20-Jan-2016 22:31:03 [SETI@home] Started download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.216 20-Jan-2016 22:31:04 [SETI@home] Finished download of 16ap11ab.32302.7429.14.41.184 20-Jan-2016 22:31:04 [SETI@home] Finished download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.168 20-Jan-2016 22:31:04 [SETI@home] Finished download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.213 20-Jan-2016 22:31:04 [SETI@home] Started download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.71 20-Jan-2016 22:31:04 [SETI@home] Started download of 16ap11ab.20138.10292.13.40.225 20-Jan-2016 22:31:04 [SETI@home] Started download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.220 20-Jan-2016 22:31:07 [SETI@home Beta Test] Finished upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4566.8.42.94_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:07 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.221_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:15 [SETI@home Beta Test] Finished upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4566.8.42.1_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:15 [SETI@home Beta Test] Finished upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4566.8.42.68_0_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:15 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.222_0_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:15 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.244_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:16 [---] Suspending computation - an exclusive app is running 20-Jan-2016 22:31:16 [---] Suspending network activity - an exclusive app is running 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [---] Resuming computation 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [---] Resuming network activity 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [ATLAS@home] Started upload of jU5LDmYXbfnnDDn7oo6G73TpABFKDmABFKDm0yGKDmABFKDmUn1Gvn_0_ATLAS_result 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [ATLAS@home] Started upload of Nv4KDm6SbfnnDDn7oo6G73TpABFKDmABFKDmZzMKDmABFKDm26azbm_0_ATLAS_result 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [ATLAS@home] Started upload of m8ZLDmziXfnnDDn7oo6G73TpABFKDmABFKDmF7JKDmABFKDmoTRPVm_1_ATLAS_result 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [ATLAS@home] Started upload of tCYLDmjUbfnnDDn7oo6G73TpABFKDmABFKDm2KFKDmABFKDmo52IQm_0_ATLAS_result 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [pogs] Started upload of MaNGA_8601-6104_area26440158_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [pogs] Started upload of MaNGA_8601-6104_area26440131_0_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [pogs] Started upload of MaNGA_8601-6104_area26440128_0_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [pogs] Started upload of MaNGA_8601-6104_area26440152_0_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [rosetta@home] Started upload of rb_01_17_62187_106509__t000__1_C1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_324775_878_0_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [rosetta@home] Started upload of rb_01_18_61979_106518__t000__1_C1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_IGNORE_THE_REST_324792_155_0_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.221_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [SETI@home] Started download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.216 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [SETI@home] Started download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.71 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [SETI@home] Started download of 16ap11ab.20138.10292.13.40.225 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [SETI@home] Started download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.220 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.222_0_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:47 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.244_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:48 [SETI@home Beta Test] Error reported by file upload server: can't open file 20-Jan-2016 22:31:48 [SETI@home Beta Test] Temporarily failed upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0: transient upload error 20-Jan-2016 22:31:48 [SETI@home Beta Test] Backing off 00:02:28 on upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.253_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:48 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4566.8.42.56_2_0 20-Jan-2016 22:31:50 [SETI@home] Finished download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.216 20-Jan-2016 22:31:50 [SETI@home] Started download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.223 20-Jan-2016 22:31:51 [SETI@home] Finished download of 16ap11ab.20138.10292.13.40.225 20-Jan-2016 22:31:51 [SETI@home] Finished download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.220 20-Jan-2016 22:31:51 [SETI@home] Started download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.113 20-Jan-2016 22:31:51 [SETI@home] Started download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.226 20-Jan-2016 22:31:53 [SETI@home] Finished download of 18ap11ag.1711.6202.5.32.71 20-Jan-2016 22:31:53 [SETI@home] Started download of 16ap11ab.32302.7429.14.41.21 20-Jan-2016 22:32:02 [SETI@home Beta Test] Finished upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.222_0_0 20-Jan-2016 22:32:02 [SETI@home Beta Test] Finished upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.244_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:32:02 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4566.8.42.87_1_0 20-Jan-2016 22:32:02 [SETI@home Beta Test] Started upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4566.8.42.57_0_0 20-Jan-2016 22:32:05 [SETI@home Beta Test] Finished upload of 06ap11ag.21334.4157.8.42.221_1_0 I suspect that network activity got suspended while the app was waiting for a reply that the file transfer was complete. For some reason the client isn't being told that the file has been received and to delete it. I'll end up aborting it. ![]() ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 10 Mar 12 Posts: 1700 Credit: 13,216,373 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Well, I have moved over to main now, after having ripped out of the new installer what I needed. (thanks Richard, and all others who have been involved in that). I never use the installer as an installer, I just rip out what I need from it with 7-zip, and remove from the .aistubs sections not needed. I take it that now that v8 has been released to main, there's no need for me to continue testing v8's here on beta? It was fun. Thanks for the coffee...:-) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 10 Sep 13 Posts: 1187 Credit: 2,791,507 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I asked before, but I don't think anyone answered (if they did, it went over my head). (Or maybe I asked in a different thread and don't remember which one.) Here is my app info for my gt 630. SETI@home v8 8.01 windows_intelx86 (cuda32) Number of tasks completed 29 Max tasks per day 70 Number of tasks today 0 Consecutive valid tasks 37 Average processing rate 18.17 GFLOPS Average turnaround time 0.60 days SETI@home v8 8.01 windows_intelx86 (cuda42) Number of tasks completed 28 Max tasks per day 69 Number of tasks today 0 Consecutive valid tasks 36 Average processing rate 17.59 GFLOPS Average turnaround time 0.44 days SETI@home v8 8.01 windows_intelx86 (cuda50) Number of tasks completed 17 Max tasks per day 50 Number of tasks today 0 Consecutive valid tasks 17 Average processing rate 17.10 GFLOPS Average turnaround time 0.68 days My goal for this machine is minimal impact on the CPU. When I install the new Lunatics for Main on it, do I want to go with 43, 42, or 50? 32 has the highest APR. 42 has the middle APR and shortest turnaround time. --------------------- And here is the app info for my gt 440. SETI@home v8 8.00 windows_intelx86 (cuda50) Number of tasks completed 72 Max tasks per day 110 Number of tasks today 0 Consecutive valid tasks 77 Average processing rate 56.43 GFLOPS Average turnaround time 0.45 days SETI@home v8 8.06 windows_intelx86 (opencl_nvidia_sah) Number of tasks completed 248 Max tasks per day 300 Number of tasks today 0 Consecutive valid tasks 267 Average processing rate 66.26 GFLOPS Average turnaround time 0.63 days SETI@home v8 8.01 windows_intelx86 (cuda32) Number of tasks completed 10 Max tasks per day 45 Number of tasks today 0 Consecutive valid tasks 12 Average processing rate 25.64 GFLOPS Average turnaround time 0.20 days SETI@home v8 8.01 windows_intelx86 (cuda42) Number of tasks completed 5 Max tasks per day 40 Number of tasks today 0 Consecutive valid tasks 7 Average processing rate 15.31 GFLOPS Average turnaround time 1.38 days I included the v8.00 cuda50s here because it hasn't done any 8.01 50s. In this case, there is also opencl to consider. My goal for this box is maximum production. I realize the sample sizes are smaller here, but what I see is cuda42 having a MUCH lower APR than 32 and almost 6x the turnaround time. OTOH, boinc seems to have settled on 42 as the best; it just downloaded a whole bunch of new 42s. Maybe I'll wait for some of those to get done and see what the effect is on the stats. Does a high APR mean you're getting the most work done, or a low one? David signature sent back to alpha testing |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
High APR is good, and I'd usually choose that above turnround time. But cuda42 also sounds good. Did we establish which version of the GT 630 you have? |
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 16 Posts: 9 Credit: 552,318 RAC: 0 ![]() |
You can run the lunatics installer and take a look at the NVIDEO screen, it gives some info on 32 recommended for this, 42 for this. You should be able to exit the installer without any changes at that point. for CPU, make note of your BOINC startup message about CPU details, your i7 is likely best on AVX, other computer might be an SSE. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 10 Sep 13 Posts: 1187 Credit: 2,791,507 RAC: 0 ![]() |
High APR is good, and I'd usually choose that above turnround time. But cuda42 also sounds good. Thanks for reminding me. I just now downloaded and installed GPU-Z. My 630 is a GF108 with DDR3 memory. [edit] Brent, I'm not crunching with the CPU on the Pentium 4, so that's moot. David signature sent back to alpha testing |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I think we'd probably recommend cuda42 for a 'GF' for Fermi. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 10 Sep 13 Posts: 1187 Credit: 2,791,507 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I think we'd probably recommend cuda42 for a 'GF' for Fermi. Okay, thanks. I'll go with that then. David signature sent back to alpha testing |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.