Message boards :
News :
SETI@home v8 beta to begin on Tuesday
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 . . . 99 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 10 Sep 13 Posts: 1187 Credit: 2,791,507 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Is there only v8 work now, or is v7 still being sent out as well? David signature sent back to alpha testing |
Send message Joined: 29 May 06 Posts: 1037 Credit: 8,440,339 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Aug 05 Posts: 2423 Credit: 15,878,738 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Is there only v8 work now, or is v7 still being sent out as well? Can't find MBv8 splitter there BTW. v7 and AP are off - good! No need to waste resources on those for now. News about SETI opt app releases: https://twitter.com/Raistmer |
Send message Joined: 18 Jun 08 Posts: 76 Credit: 113,089 RAC: 0 ![]() |
It's not the FLOPs or APR that bothers me. I'm bothered that I had that overflow task and it seems it got included in all those estimate calculations. No matter how bad CreditNew is including tasks with abnormal runtime can't make it any better. I don't usually pay any attention to things like this so I don't really now if this is how everything works normally. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 10 Sep 13 Posts: 1187 Credit: 2,791,507 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Is there only v8 work now, or is v7 still being sent out as well? It shows 4100 tasks available for v8, but my box is asking and being told no tasks available. David signature sent back to alpha testing |
![]() Send message Joined: 15 Mar 05 Posts: 1547 Credit: 27,183,456 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Something is wrong with the stats page. We haven't generated 4000 results for v8, and v7 result generation should still be on. Hmmmmmm. Windows client for v8 should be released tomorrow morning. ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 10 Sep 13 Posts: 1187 Credit: 2,791,507 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Something is wrong with the stats page. We haven't generated 4000 results for v8, and v7 result generation should still be on. Hmmmmmm. Oh yeah, I forgot there was no v8 app for Windows yet. David signature sent back to alpha testing |
Send message Joined: 18 May 06 Posts: 280 Credit: 26,477,429 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Will v7 e going away? Will v8 be able to crunch data from all sources? Or will v7 stick around, in parallel? Bump. To be clear, this is not a question for what work will be issued here on beta. This is a roadmap question. Is v8 replacing v7? Or will both need to run in parallel? Dublin, California Team: SETI.USA ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 15 Mar 05 Posts: 1547 Credit: 27,183,456 RAC: 0 ![]() |
8 will be completely replacing 7, once we have all the appropriate app versions in place (i.e. GPU/optimized version). We'll probably continue using v7 on Arecibo workunits until the GPU versions are available, but we won't ever use v7 on GBT or Parkes workunits. PS. The priority of v7 workunits (i.e. the share of the scheduler queue) will also be going down tomorrow. ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Aug 05 Posts: 2423 Credit: 15,878,738 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Something is wrong with the stats page. We haven't generated 4000 results for v8, and v7 result generation should still be on. Hmmmmmm. LoL, state page shows betterview than reality has. I would strongly recommend to disable v7 work generation at least after Windows app deployment. Besides usual arguments about being green and not waste energy for nothing there is another consideration: v8 deployed in opt-in mode here. That is user needs to manually switch it ON. For that he has pay attention to what is going on on beta. And to disrupt constant work flow is one of finest ways to attract cruncher's attention :D News about SETI opt app releases: https://twitter.com/Raistmer |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Windows app is up and running with GBT data. CPU app only, with working graphics, FFTW 3-3-4. Main app is a stonking 55 MB download - lots of debug material, I'd guess, but watch out if you're on a restricted download circuit. |
Send message Joined: 30 Dec 13 Posts: 258 Credit: 12,340,341 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Thanks for the info Richard Edit.. First 8 are processing.. my estimate is just over 2 hours on my i7 Chip. I'll test later with an AMD 8 Core once I know they validate on the Intel first Nice to see the graphics again. |
![]() Send message Joined: 10 Sep 10 Posts: 21 Credit: 852,516 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Windows app is up and running with GBT data. CPU app only, with working graphics, FFTW 3-3-4. Just d/l'ed 47 tasks - est. a little over 45 days @ an avg. of 22.37 hrs. each, with first due on 17 March. ![]() I don't buy computers, I build them!! |
Send message Joined: 30 Dec 13 Posts: 258 Credit: 12,340,341 RAC: 0 ![]() |
First 20 work units on i7 (3.75Ghz) coming in between 1 hr 4 min fastest -1 hr 15 min slowest when No GPU work load on board With view graphics, GPU utilization between 12-25% Once the GPUs are added to the mix, under full load, the times increased by ~12-14 minutes so now quickest is 1 hr 15min, slowest 1 hr, 27 minutes AMD 8 core (4.42GhZ) is running 2 hours 25 minutes (fastest was 2 hours but all the rest have been closer to 2 hr 27 minutes) average with no GPU work units on board. With view Graphics, GPU utilization is averaging 19% All work units have VLAR at the end of their names |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 15 Jun 05 Posts: 399 Credit: 16,571,350 RAC: 0 ![]() |
On my machine (i5-based Windows 10), boinc stopped suddenly. I erased BOINC programs and all the data, and reinstalled BOINC. Now it crunches astropulse only in 3 threads with 1 thread vacant. Now BOINC manager cannot connect to BOINC client and I don't know what's going on ;( Is it because it's windows 10? Luckiest in the world. WMD = Weapon of Mass Distraction |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 15 Jun 05 Posts: 399 Credit: 16,571,350 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I tried to run seti@home 7.99 in the command prompt windows w/o arguments, it froze. No action, no cpu usage in the task manager, doesn't stop with ctrl+c. hmmm Windows is difficult :) Luckiest in the world. WMD = Weapon of Mass Distraction |
![]() Send message Joined: 15 Mar 05 Posts: 1547 Credit: 27,183,456 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I guess I'll need to put a Windows 10 system together for testing. I wouldn't expect it to have a problem with a command line executable like the setiathome app. ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 15 Jun 05 Posts: 399 Credit: 16,571,350 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Just a moment! It was because seti@home 7.99 was so big. After some reboots, it grew bigger and now it's running! Please Eric, don't mind Windows 10. I just wonder why BOINC manager also froze during downloading. But who is to blame? Me? No. I noticed actually BOINC had completely frozen for longer than 2 hours. BOINC client? It stopped during downloading seti@home v8 client and didn't accept BOINC manager connection. I guess maybe it needs attention with Windows 10, not seti/astropulse clients. I wrote an email to you. Luckiest in the world. WMD = Weapon of Mass Distraction |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 15 Jun 05 Posts: 399 Credit: 16,571,350 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Self reply. I tried to install BOINC on another Windows 10 machine and it went smoothly! So I AM TO BLAME!! Then why BOINC client failed to download seti@home v8 client for longer than 2 hours and rejected connection to BOINC manager? hmm..... Sorry... Luckiest in the world. WMD = Weapon of Mass Distraction |
Send message Joined: 1 May 07 Posts: 556 Credit: 6,470,846 RAC: 0 ![]() |
V8 how are the CPU and Run times being calculated all seem to be high?? 20653287 7528796 10 Dec 2015, 0:16:19 UTC 10 Dec 2015, 9:00:49 UTC Completed and validated 18,057.22 17,166.16 224.00 SETI@home v8 v7.99 windows_intelx86 20653136 7528746 9 Dec 2015, 23:20:48 UTC 10 Dec 2015, 9:00:49 UTC Completed and validated 18,250.57 17,358.45 224.00 SETI@home v8 v7.99 windows_intelx86 20616319 7516830 9 Dec 2015, 20:25:21 UTC 10 Dec 2015, 6:57:07 UTC Completed and validated 17,517.59 16,659.38 224.00 SETI@home v8 v7.99 windows_intelx86 20616323 7516831 9 Dec 2015, 20:25:21 UTC 10 Dec 2015, 4:58:03 UTC Completed and validated 25,280.44 18,678.73 224.00 SETI@home v8 v7.99 windows_intelx86 20616098 7516756 9 Dec 2015, 20:25:21 UTC 10 Dec 2015, 6:57:07 UTC Completed and validated 18,121.56 17,246.00 141.04 SETI@home v8 v7.99 windows_intelx86 20616228 7516799 9 Dec 2015, 19:40:01 UTC 10 Dec 2015, 3:55:17 UTC Completed and validated 27,283.23 19,125.89 42.34 SETI@home v8 v7.99 windows_intelx86 20768302 7566818 9 Dec 2015, 15:16:44 UTC 10 Dec 2015, 2:05:10 UTC Completed and validated 19,466.22 11,602.55 49.67 SETI@home v7 v7.00 windows_intelx86 20768111 7566755 9 Dec 2015, 15:16:44 UTC 10 Dec 2015, 2:05:10 UTC Completed and validated 18,452.79 11,464.22 48.57 SETI@home v7 v7.00 windows_intelx86 20768400 7566851 9 Dec 2015, 15:16:44 UTC 9 Dec 2015, 21:34:13 UTC Completed, waiting for validation 19,064.72 12,172.44 pending SETI@home v7 v7.00 windows_intelx86 20768171 7566775 9 Dec 2015, 15:16:44 UTC 9 Dec 2015, 20:24:38 UTC Completed and validated 18,437.69 11,931.77 56.45 SETI@home v7 v7.00 Michael A computer program will always do what you tell it to do, but rarely what you want it to do. |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.