yap

Hey, It's Time to Start Firing People who are Atheist and Scientific in Public. Can't Have Christian Religious Expression in Public, then Atheist and Science Expression in Public needs to be Banned. I'm OFFENDED by Science and Atheists.
Facts aka LIES, do not Matter.
Time to Drain dA Swamp
Alligator Yap

Well B.E.N. you're repeating yourself. Maybe people find repetition boring? Or maybe you should try a funnier Yap?
Anyhow religion and science not same thang.
Some religious folk try using science to make religion be a better Yap. ID for one.
No scientific folk trying to use religion to prove their Yap. "God says so" ain't no proof.
When DJT said "Time to drain dA Swamp" he meant to say "Time to Drain dA Snake", or "I gotta Pee".
I think he wears 2 diapers now.

Y'all can quit beating each other up on my behalf.
It was not my intention to start up such infighting.

So, please kiss and make up now.

And just know that I am a happier man today than I was yesterday.
I really am.
Clearing the air of some doubts does work wonders at times.
And life is going to get even better for me.

Amazing that my internet is even working, because my line is nothing but static, too much to even make a call.
I had to use my cell phone to call in to the service department.
Last time that happened, it took two days for them to sort it.
Bad pair of copper in an ages old demarcation box. They had just one extra pair left to cut over to at that time.
Dunno how they're gonna work around it this time. Same pair of copper since the home was built back in '54.
The drop from the pole at the back of my lot was replaced underground when the power company had to trench in a new line after the old one shorted out. And the phone company took advantage of the work to add a new phone line alongside the power lines.
So, this problem is between that pole and the demarcation box which is located about a quarter mile down the road.
Wish they would drop fiber here, but it is a very old neighborhood. My grandparents built this home, and it was one of the first properties platted here from an old cow pasture.
Yes, my home predates me by just 3 years.
Now you may guess why I am so comfortable here.

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

Y'all can quit beating each other up on my behalf.
It was not my intention to start up such infighting.

So, please kiss and make up now....

....

ROFLMFAO!!!!!

Cheers.

Y'all can quit beating each other up on my behalf.
It was not my intention to start up such infighting.

So, please kiss and make up now....

....

ROFLMFAO!!!!!

Cheers.

Glad that I could bring a smile to at least one other on this planet.

Meow.

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

Y'all can quit beating each other up on my behalf.
It was not my intention to start up such infighting.

So, please kiss and make up now....

....

ROFLMFAO!!!!!

Cheers.

Give what you can. https://www.au.org/

---

Jesus of Nazareth.

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

@ kittyman

Love and compassion are definitely things of life which we should hope for, but the truth of the matter, or in fact, may not always be so.

My guess is that even such people as atheists and agnostics are able to see the bad things sometimes happening and next think that there may be an explanation for such a thing and not
necessarily an excuse.

In my opinion both humans as well as other living organisms are made from flesh and blood and therefore both such a thing as a given smile as well as that of "tears in the rain" could be part of it.

Those mentioned words above could therefore be one given thing, but we could also have that of a given sacrifice as well.

Such things as both birth, life and next death are part of a given life cycle and because of that we need to know or understand the meaning of life itself.

I have mentioned the Aura in the past and the fact that there could be reason to believe that there could me more to it than just a smile or even those tears.

I am not the one who readily believe in the Ten Commandments of the Bible, or take such a thing literally.

Rather there should be more to it and such a thing should be left to that of possible science.

Also the fact that making a possible separation between God and the Devil for a given thing is like that of white versus black, when there also could be other colors.

If everything came into being as a result of the Big Bang, both such things as Laws and Equations could be part of such a thing, but next we could be left at interpreting these Laws
rather than perhaps think about or relate these with something else.

Definitely such a thing as Creation Myth rather than a given Matter Creation soon becomes that of the possible black versus white for the same, but next we could be left to
choose whether or not any such Laws and Equations are supposed to mean a given "Order" rather than something else.

I will have more for the atheists and agnostics later on since we probably may disagree here as well.

Edit: Thanks for the link, Mark.

Reading a little down, my guess is that perhaps the original idea or concept of perhaps carrying out such a thing as science could better be carried out from the view of being either
an atheist or agnostic, because when doing so, we may not always know what the end result could be from doing such a thing.

Starting with perhaps either an idea, or perhaps conception or even misconception at times, the fact that a given story could be lacking completeness at times.

Take the given example of "Lucy" as our possible ancestor and next the fact that those things which could be known, or perhaps told about Stone Age Man are only part of a larger story.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

Not the complete list for this available right now, but here is a quite good article related to this subject.

Therefore, when watching the mentioned YouTube video, there is no science here at all, only a history from the past being told.

If one of the Ten Commandments of the Bible, possibly the first, is that of "You shall not lie", you still do not see such a thing as stars, planets, or galaxies in the sky, or at least not the
elementary particles of microcosmos.

Is the reason for this that we are supposed to believe that the latter should be that of a given Creation and next we should believe in such a thing as well?

Perhaps it could end up being the telescope rather than the electron microscope instead and still we could believe that it rather may be a painting instead.

By the way, are we not supposed to believe in both the Scientific Method and Standard Model for such a thing and next that such a way of thinking should benefit both atheists and agnostics?

As one of the regular posters here, I definitely know about myself when it comes to both opinion and ideas and that such a thing also goes with other people around here.

For one thing there becomes different subjects, including that of the Oscars, but next the way we should know how people would be posting their response.

Not everything is about the subject of belief, in the same way as possibly that of both matter and energy, but it could be about those blunders happening as well.

The words of the newbie should be much different than those with some experience, but there could always be a difference when it comes to an intended meaning.

Therefore, if you happen to be one of those not believing that we paid a visit to the Moon, is such a thing necessarily about that of being an atheist or agnostic, or perhaps rather that of
not believing in the Scientific Method for such a thing?

Definitely we could be having such things as Idiosyncracy and Hypocrisy at times, but most likely or better it should be if we still could adhere to a given Methodology for a certain thing.

Y'all can quit beating each other up on my behalf.
It was not my intention to start up such infighting.

So, please kiss and make up now....

....

ROFLMFAO!!!!!

Cheers.

C'mere, marky, so I can plant a big un on ye.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

Y'all can quit beating each other up on my behalf.
It was not my intention to start up such infighting.

So, please kiss and make up now....

....

ROFLMFAO!!!!!

Cheers.

C'mere, marky, so I can plant a big un on ye.

Tickle them tonsils!

---

Y'all can quit beating each other up on my behalf.
It was not my intention to start up such infighting.

So, please kiss and make up now....

....

ROFLMFAO!!!!!

Cheers.

C'mere, marky, so I can plant a big un on ye.

Tickle them tonsils!

They only do that on Class BA dash 3 PLANETS.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

LOL and here I am trying to eat 'dinner'...

---

#resist

I do not crossdress. You can see my explanation in my OH, Hei there thread in the cafe.

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

In the beginning...

God created both the Earth and Heaven.

Perhaps something is slipping by or past when using this sentence.

So why not leave that of Politics "as is" when it comes to a given subject, when you also know that a couple of other things could be approached by a different angle, or angles?

I had to look up the word "bigotry" using Google Translate.

When perhaps making it that of either Politics, or even Economics, such a thing as bigotry could perhaps be put into a given context, including that of possible greed, or selfishness.

Of course, we rather could have this discussion at BOINC instead, but is it not the fact that you could push away a possible rival in favor of yourself because of such a possible bigotry,
rather than something else?

My guess is that such a word or phrase as "In the beginning" could at times be used, but except for time itself, we could be left between that of Matter Creation and that of Creation Myth in order to
understand or explain a couple of things.

If for some reason both Hillary and Bill Clinton were adhering to a given "norm" and next Donald Trump came in as a possible substitute, or even Joker, is it possible to look at such a thing in another way?

If I am not wrong, a given Politics and that of a given decency should be following suit most of the time, but apparently former President George W. Bush (the younger) was able to come up with a smile and
perhaps a bit more.

Why not perhaps make it that of given Laws when it comes to that of Justice and next think that such a thing as "License to kill" should be part of such a system, or perhaps game?

Are we perhaps forgetting the Government at times and its intended purpose for its workings or functionality?

Read around at BOINC for such a thing, including a mentioning of a possible identity crisis by means of a given paper.

This reminds me about the word "ambiguity" as opposed to that of being possibly ambitious.

I previously mentioned that a given Logic perhaps could be the difference between True and False, or even that of Right and Wrong, but next that this may not necessarily be that easy.

The browser apparently became lost right now and next losing the last couple of lines.

But if you happen to buy either a pack of soap, or a similar for that of toothpaste, is such a thing supposed to be meant for a given market?

Are we always supposed to be speaking about given gains, or revenue, or could it also be about that of similar or possible expenses, or even losses at times?

What if it ever happened that I could perhaps "believe" in a given thing and next think or believe that it could be any science?

The truth of the matter is that regardless of a given thing, you always would need to walk the whole thread down a given path in order to come up with a given answer.

If so, it perhaps could be that of a given Logic for such, but when using Google Translate for a couple of words, it becomes either
beatitude, blessedness, bliss, salvation, or the beatitude, for that of a given word.

And next also that of preaching, proclamation, preaching of, or ministry, for yet another word.

Speak of that of God and you could have that of possible love and compassion for such a thing.

Next, speak about that of the Devil and you next could be having the possible hatred, or at least envy instead.

Personally, I do make that of a possible bigotry something else than a given hatred.

If so, are we perhaps supposed to either believe, or possibly interpret such words in a given way or another?

Perhaps adding a bit more before finishing.

Edit: Perhaps "mercy" or "mercy of contents" for such a thing.

Or perhaps it could be viewed or looked at or upon in this way.

There definitely could be times when we could be looking at a couple of things based on that of given "moral and deeds" for such a thing.

One of the Ten Commandments, perhaps the first, is that of "You shall not lie" and for some reason I make it that of a given Logic.

Next you could be the Seti@home user coming in here and next proclaim a given thing for a given purpose or meaning.

If or when so, are we next ready to accept that such a thing could be meeting a given criterion by means of being a possible standard, or perhaps belong or relate to a given Logic for such a thing?

If the given term by means of its wording is "I sold, you bought", we never speak of any usage, including that of possible wear or tear for such a given thing.

Speak of possible return or yield when it comes to that of possible profit or gain, but are we supposed to be doing the same when it comes to a similar loss of such profit, or revenue?

We should know that from a scientific point of view, we are supposed to believe in such things as UFO's, aliens and also "Little Green Men" because it could benefit possible science.

Are we supposed to believe that God perhaps pressed the button in order to make the Universe a given reality?

Regardless of a given technology, we could be left between chosing that of man-made, or human for such a thing.

Next perhaps rather believe in the birds and the bees for such a thing and that such a thing as "conception" could perhaps come before other things.

Needs perhaps an edit, but should tell that this may be somewhat difficult getting straight on, or at the point.

Assumedly both the Standard Model, as well as the Scientific Method is supposed to be telling about a given validity when it comes to a given answer, without necessarily telling about a possible "truth".

Also a given Dictionary is supposed to be having a Table of Contents before the main article.

One part of Project Management is possibly that of "Quality Assurance" and next I do not necessarily make that of science any similar either.

Perhaps more to come.

To all of my heros...............
May your hands be..........

May they always accept the opinions that others do not understand.
May you please continue to defend those that do not somehow deserve defending.
May you come back home safe and sound.

And,
May you accept my gratitude for doing what I myself cannot do?

Thank you, my would be sons and daughters at home and abroad.
I realize that you would rather be home on the couch as I am at this moment.
I thank God that you are not.
There are many that do not realize or thank you for the sacrifices you are making.

Just know that I am not one of them.

Amen,
Mark.

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

Mark, after watching some 45 seconds of the video, it becomes only a set of circumstances for such a thing.

Assumedly Attorney General William Sessions (losing first name) is there or here right now for a given meaning or purpose.

Make it "your" Constitution if you will and next because of a possible narrowness of vision, or perhaps "belief" when it comes to that of a given sight.

I mentioned that of a possible paper problem in the past or earlier one, but right now find such a thing hard when it comes to that of a given Justice.

Make it rather that of a given "I sold, you bought" when it comes to a given Economics, or that of Finances and you should know where such a thing should go.

Rather question such a thing as the Justice system and you could possibly be doing this when it comes to that of being possibly heavy handed.

Perhaps you did not notice, but next remember the words of Arnold Schwarzenegger, namely "Kill me, kill me".

Why so, except the fact that you are supposed to be a hero.

Perhaps more to be added here.

Why so, except the fact that you are supposed to be a hero..

I am generally acknowledged to be one of the best all time contributors to the project.

Where in the world did you get the bit about being a hero?
You have baffled me on that one.
I identify with the Christ child, and I would appreciated it if comments were limited to the thread title.
He was our one saviour, but I do not recall even being called a 'hero',
Such perfect identities were not in play back then, only in our comic books of the 50s and 60s.
Even 'Hero' comic books did not become common knowledge until I believe about '62.
Comic book fans, correct me on my timeline.

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

The generally acknowledged earliest comic book is The Adventures of Obadiah Oldbuck published in 1837 in Europe. Even Dick Tracy dates back to 1931. What you're referring to is considered the Golden Age of comic books in the '50's and '60's.

But as to the topic, heroes aren't unique to comic books. Stories have always centered around a main character whom had to overcome great odds and defeat the bad guys or die for the greater good. This concept dates back to the earliest storytelling such as the Epic of Gilgamesh and even many great Grecian mythologies. It isn't too far fetched to see that, if one were to look at the Christian Bible as having been put together (like a council of sorts, from maybe Nicea) purposefully to tell the story of a hero of the wretched and the poor, promising them that they will achieve eternal happiness if they model their lives after him. Then the big, bad, and powerful Romans become angered that this "nobody" is lifting the spirits of the broken and the damned, so they kill him off, but not after being betrayed by a friend for some coin. If the Bible weren't filled with such terrible morality and flat characters, I'd say it would make for a great story! Say, for example, the Matrix trilogy was better done than the Bible even though the stories were almost the same.