APs Sent to CPU When Explicitly Forbidden

Message boards : Number crunching : APs Sent to CPU When Explicitly Forbidden
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Cruncher-American Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor

Send message
Joined: 25 Mar 02
Posts: 1513
Credit: 370,893,186
RAC: 340
United States
Message 1763133 - Posted: 7 Feb 2016, 16:36:06 UTC

On both my machines I am getting occasional APs sent to CPUs as 7.00 or 7.03, rather than the 7.10s that are sent to my GPUs. The vast majority are sent to the GPUs, but I seem to get a handful of APs sent to the CPUs each time a new AP batch is processed by the servers. My prefs are set to do AP only on GPU.

This is a clear server error, right? And it has been going on ever since v8 was released, I believe, IIRC.

Any idea when the Powers That Be will take a look at this?
ID: 1763133 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1763137 - Posted: 7 Feb 2016, 16:49:10 UTC - in response to Message 1763133.  

How do you think you are setting "AP only on GPU"?

Unless you can explain your full setup, and how you think it forbids APs being sent to CPU, there's not really anything for the Powers That Be to look at.
ID: 1763137 · Report as offensive
Cruncher-American Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor

Send message
Joined: 25 Mar 02
Posts: 1513
Credit: 370,893,186
RAC: 340
United States
Message 1763149 - Posted: 7 Feb 2016, 17:32:44 UTC - in response to Message 1763137.  

Thanks, Richard

Looks to me like you are correct. I looked at my SETI and computing prefs, and there does NOT seem to be a way to prevent APs from being run on CPU if I have it enabled at all.

I should have said I am running stock for now; with Lunatics I can accept only GPU for AP (IIRC, which I was doing pre-v8). The servers did d/l to me both the GPU AP 7.10 (1/3/16) and CPU AP 7.03 SSE2 (2/1) and SSE (1/28) and 7.00 (2/3).

So: I guess I have to go Lunatics to prevent AP on CPU?
ID: 1763149 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1763157 - Posted: 7 Feb 2016, 17:43:34 UTC - in response to Message 1763149.  

That would be the easiest way, yes. It wasn't the prime purpose of developing the installer, but it does give you much more control over what does (or doesn't) get installed.
ID: 1763157 · Report as offensive
Cruncher-American Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor

Send message
Joined: 25 Mar 02
Posts: 1513
Credit: 370,893,186
RAC: 340
United States
Message 1763169 - Posted: 7 Feb 2016, 18:31:37 UTC - in response to Message 1763157.  

That would be the easiest way, yes.



ok, I'll bite - is there another way of doing it, then?
ID: 1763169 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1763176 - Posted: 7 Feb 2016, 18:41:01 UTC - in response to Message 1763169.  

That would be the easiest way, yes.

ok, I'll bite - is there another way of doing it, then?

Write your own app_info.xml file from the ground up? :P

[That's not an entirely frivolous suggestion - it's how we all started. The recipe is in Anonymous platform, and you'll find 95%+ of the ingredients in your current client_state.xml file.]
ID: 1763176 · Report as offensive
Cruncher-American Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor

Send message
Joined: 25 Mar 02
Posts: 1513
Credit: 370,893,186
RAC: 340
United States
Message 1763270 - Posted: 7 Feb 2016, 22:45:59 UTC - in response to Message 1763176.  

Richard -

that's too much like work, especially since I will be going to Lunatics by the end of Feb. at the latest. I am trying to get a feel for the stock apps now so I can get a decent feel for how much better Lunatics is when I go there.

Thanks for your help, though, I really appreciate it.
ID: 1763270 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : APs Sent to CPU When Explicitly Forbidden


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.