Message boards :
Politics :
Hi. I'm Alex and I am an INTJ.
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Angela Send message Joined: 16 Oct 07 Posts: 13131 Credit: 39,854,104 RAC: 31 |
ESFJ Variant: Assertive Role: Sentinel You are one of the Sentinels - a reliable and dedicated individual who respects traditions and prizes responsibility. You are known for your enthusiasm, social skills and caring nature. It seems that I am a good little soldier... |
Sarge Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 12273 Credit: 8,569,109 RAC: 79 |
Bet none of you can get the test to evenly split on even one of the 4 dimensions. Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes. |
Angela Send message Joined: 16 Oct 07 Posts: 13131 Credit: 39,854,104 RAC: 31 |
Bet none of you can get the test to evenly split on even one of the 4 dimensions. Maybe you could do that if you just kept every answer in the original/neutral position? |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30701 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
Bet none of you can get the test to evenly split on even one of the 4 dimensions. Moderation in all things ..... oooooommmmmm |
Мишель Send message Joined: 26 Nov 13 Posts: 3073 Credit: 87,868 RAC: 0 |
Latest table. Aww, why do you keep me out of your tables :( |
Sarge Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 12273 Credit: 8,569,109 RAC: 79 |
Bet none of you can get the test to evenly split on even one of the 4 dimensions. I took the test (Myers-Briggs) 2 or 3 times in the late 80s. I do not recall enough about it to know if there were neutral choices. My guess is, no, there weren't. I see to recall consistent answers to multiple questions led to certain qualifications. I did not set out to split it on 1 dimension, I did. A year to 1.5 yrs. later, it was not split and on another dimension I had reversed, but I blame that on a breakup with a girlfriend. ;) Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes. |
Sarge Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 12273 Credit: 8,569,109 RAC: 79 |
Bet none of you can get the test to evenly split on even one of the 4 dimensions. Wow, I must've been more tired than I realized when I typed this! Replace "see" with "seem" and "qualifications" with "classifications" or "categorizations". Begin the 2nd paragraph with "Although I did not set out ...". Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes. |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
Latest table I think you need a good mixture of types to have a good Mod team. Evryone brings a differant perspective to the table. [/quote] Old James |
The Simonator Send message Joined: 18 Nov 04 Posts: 5700 Credit: 3,855,702 RAC: 50 |
In that case, you heard wrong. Astrology has absolutely nothing in common with psychology and no, its not being used by the military, FBI or CIA because its complete and total nonsense. Let it be clear, but the position of the moon, planets, sun, stars and other heavenly bodies has absolutely zero influence on what you are like as a person. It's true that the position of the stars has no relevance to one's actions. But, one's astrological sign can be an indication of what you're like as a person. (Hear me out!) I've read studies (i could find them if you insist), proper statistical scientific studies that show clearly that Libras and Scorpios do better at life (Greater salary, better job, higher life satisfaction) than Leos and Cancers. (On an overall average, never mind what individuals may achieve). How can this be? We all know astrology is bunk! Well, Libras and Scorpios are born September 23rd to November 21st. Which means that at school they're the elder ones in the class year. They're physically stronger during their formative years at primary school (which are so very important) and they retain information better when learning due to being just that little bit older. This head-start carries them onward through life. So there we have a scientific explanation for something that at first glance might appear to be tied to the motion of heavenly bodies, but actually comes down to a very simple earthly reason. Life on earth is the global equivalent of not storing things in the fridge. |
Мишель Send message Joined: 26 Nov 13 Posts: 3073 Credit: 87,868 RAC: 0 |
It's true that the position of the stars has no relevance to one's actions. Interesting, but what you are describing is merely a correlation, not a causation. Those people (and Im one of them :P ) don't do better because they were born under a certain sign, they do better because of the way we have divided the year (based on harvest season). If we were to change the start of the new academic year to say the 7th of January it would be people born in January, Februari, March who would do better. |
The Simonator Send message Joined: 18 Nov 04 Posts: 5700 Credit: 3,855,702 RAC: 50 |
Interesting, but what you are describing is merely a correlation, not a causation. Those people (and Im one of them :P ) don't do better because they were born under a certain sign, they do better because of the way we have divided the year (based on harvest season). If we were to change the start of the new academic year to say the 7th of January it would be people born in January, Februari, March who would do better. That was exactly my point. Life on earth is the global equivalent of not storing things in the fridge. |
Мишель Send message Joined: 26 Nov 13 Posts: 3073 Credit: 87,868 RAC: 0 |
Honestly you two would argue about which drop of rain on a window pane was winning the race to the bottom!!! Well I am an INTP after all. Arguing is my way of reasoning, according to that sites description :P |
The Simonator Send message Joined: 18 Nov 04 Posts: 5700 Credit: 3,855,702 RAC: 50 |
Honestly you two would argue about which drop of rain on a window pane was winning the race to the bottom!!! It's that one you fool, that one i tell you! The one on the left that looks like WB Yeats! Life on earth is the global equivalent of not storing things in the fridge. |
Dena Wiltsie Send message Joined: 19 Apr 01 Posts: 1628 Credit: 24,230,968 RAC: 26 |
The test is all messed up with me. It states I am a ESTJ and I may give the outward appearance of that but is missing something. I am a very strong introvert who over the years has learned how to interface with society. Had it not been for several external influences, I would not test as a ESTJ. |
Dena Wiltsie Send message Joined: 19 Apr 01 Posts: 1628 Credit: 24,230,968 RAC: 26 |
Hello fellow ESTJ :-)) Learned ESTJ, I wasn't born that way. If I took the test 40 years ago, it wouldn't have turned out the same. |
shizaru Send message Joined: 14 Jun 04 Posts: 1130 Credit: 1,967,904 RAC: 0 |
Out of sync, I know... Catching up on my posts :) Hello. I'm anniet and I'm an INFJ :) A mix between Mother Teresa & a whacky Mel Gibson? I may have only read but a tiny fraction of your 5000 posts Annie but yeah... that combo sounds about right! :D On a side note, I doubt Nicole Kidman actually HAS a personality. Probably should be filed under "generic" :) |
shizaru Send message Joined: 14 Jun 04 Posts: 1130 Credit: 1,967,904 RAC: 0 |
The test is all messed up with me. Dena, try this one :) http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=76569&postid=1631164 |
Dena Wiltsie Send message Joined: 19 Apr 01 Posts: 1628 Credit: 24,230,968 RAC: 26 |
I did a little more learning about the test and I can see why it failed to understand me. Test said Extraverted I say introverted because I have learned to interact with people so my actions don't match what's inside. Test said Observant I am a mix of intuitive and Observant. For intuitive, I am imaginative, rely on my intuition, absorbed in ideas and focus on what might happen. For observant, I rely on my senses, absorbed in practical matters and focus on what has happened. The test said Thinking and in this area, the test nailed it. The test said Judging. For judging, I do like clear rules and guidelines. For Prospecting, I am good at improvising (but I like to avoid doing it under pressure), and I like to keep my options open, I am relaxed about my work and I seek freedom. The test didn't say but I am an Assertive personality but a little bit of a perfectionist. This would make me a (IE)(NS)(T)(JP)(AP) type person. I knew I was messed up but I never knew how much : ) I think it might be a life time of seeing features in others that I admired and adding them to the ones I already have. I would expect somebody younger might have a more clearly defined personality because life didn't have the time to corrupt the personality they started out with. |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30701 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
I did a little more learning about the test and I can see why it failed to understand me. Isn't it a bitch when you get to the question that is one or the other and you want to mark strongly on both?! |
Dena Wiltsie Send message Joined: 19 Apr 01 Posts: 1628 Credit: 24,230,968 RAC: 26 |
I did a little more learning about the test and I can see why it failed to understand me. That's why I was responding to questions with a bit more one than the other. The test isn't designed for people who want the best (or worst) of both worlds. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.