Astropulse - Radar Removal - Why?

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Astropulse - Radar Removal - Why?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile KC5VDJ - Jim the Enchanter
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 81
Credit: 4,083,597
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1548103 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 18:19:35 UTC
Last modified: 26 Jul 2014, 18:24:11 UTC

class T_remove_radar: total=2.08e+009, N=1, <>=2.08e+009, min=2.08e+009, max=2.08e+009

Although I understand the need to remove local radar signals, especially when in a band allocated to radiolocation, why do we automatically remove ALL radar?

On the matter of radar, I hold that all civilizations that discover radio, will soon discover radar. I also hold that regardless of advances in that civilization, radar will never outlive it's usefulness.

Communications signals may go from analog to some form of digital, but the need to track flying or orbiting objects will remain. Pulsed CW radar and swept radar should, for any civilization remain both indefinitely, and at high power output.

Shouldn't we be looking for radar in bands not allocated to radiolocation on Earth?
Delidded i7-4790K (CLU/CLU) at 4.7GHz @ 1.310Vcore 24/7, 32GB DDR3-2400, Corsair H100i v2, Gigabyte Z97X-Gaming G1 WIFI-BK, MSI Radeon RX 480 Gaming 4G, HX-650 PSU, Corsair 750D

ID: 1548103 · Report as offensive
Josef W. Segur
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 4504
Credit: 1,414,761
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1548125 - Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 18:59:13 UTC - in response to Message 1548103.  

Although it is called radar removal, in actuality it is RFI removal. The application checks the data for abnormal characteristics and replaces those sections.

IMO it is effectively a check whether the receiver front end has been driven into nonlinearity by excessive signal strength. If an e.t. mother ship were on the Moon and using radar to develop topographic maps of Earth, I guess Astropulse wouldn't detect that. But more seriously, I think it's possible that Astropulse might miss a sufficiently strong transient radio pulse such as the one pictured on http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/ap_info.php.
                                                                   Joe
ID: 1548125 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34053
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1549512 - Posted: 29 Jul 2014, 15:58:33 UTC

ID: 1549512 · Report as offensive

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Astropulse - Radar Removal - Why?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.