Message boards :
Politics :
Fiction as Reality
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Julie Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34041 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 |
Came across this very interesting read. Thought it might be needed to put it here, could help some of you people imo:) https://www.adf.org/articles/philosophy/fictionr.html My claim that fiction is more basic than fact in no way implies that every fiction is worthy of acceptance. We have many criteria to distinguish good fiction from bad. In science, for example, in order to be accepted it must be testable, it must be the best explanation, and meet all of the other criteria scientists have for good theories. Or, if it is a claim about the physical world rather than a theory, then in order for the story to be good it must be consistent with the best theories available. (It is extremely bad fiction, evaluated by the criteria of science, to think that if you just believe a bullet call do you no harm, then it won't.) I believe we are using the wrong criteria to evaluate religious fiction. Most people seem to believe that the issue with religion is whether the gods, or god, etc. exist, and they evaluate religions according to how each one answers that question. But religion originally was not about a commitment to metaphysical beliefs, but a set of practices. (Religion has to do with performing rites in the proper manner.) In fact, one of the main difficulties of scholars is that in many cases, they can't connect known behaviors with beliefs. Religion, more than any other field, tells us what kinds of activities to perform. (Ethics tells us what to do in particular situations, where religion tells us what ritual behaviors to perform on a regular basis.) Therefore the yardstick of good fiction in religion shouldn't be how well it answers the question, 'do the gods exist' but how well it answers the question, 'what are the gods like, what practices do they demand?' Their existence is utterly irrelevant to religion; it's their attributes which are essential. If people judged the religion by the values it espouses, the place it gives them in the universe, the image of divinity it upholds, then no one would choose a religion which made him hate himself or whose values were impoverished. Article by Deborah Kest rOZZ Music Pictures |
Batter Up Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0 |
Thought it might be needed to put it here, could help some of you people imo:)What do you mean by "you people"? |
Julie Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34041 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 |
|
Batter Up Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0 |
I wrote 'some of you people'. People who mix up reality and fiction at times;)Oh like on this supposed forum. |
Julie Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34041 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 |
|
Batter Up Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0 |
I wrote 'some of you people'. People who mix up reality and fiction at times;)Oh like on this supposed forum. Do you have anybody in mind? I know of several, some more mixed up than others. Some are just having sport but some may have real problems. |
Jim Martin Send message Joined: 21 Jun 03 Posts: 2473 Credit: 646,848 RAC: 0 |
Metaphors, and other tropes, are the ways of figuratively describing the world. Literal images are employed, in more direct ways. Literal and figurative images, used to describe what our senses have evolved to cope with -- and thrive in, are based on our five senses. I would base a validity of our senses, on evolution. The senses, plus the brain to interpret them, evolved in concert with the ever-changing world environment. Those interpretations of the environment which did not confer any benefits on the organism, would pass from a species' gene pool (or, be rendered irrelevant, or, used for another purpose). Those, which accurately interpreted the environment, would be retained, and passed on through succeeding generations. But, extinction is, also, still, a reality -- given enough time. Especially, today, when some people choose to ignore what some peoples senses -- aided by scientific instrumentation -- have been showing: global warming is a reality, whether natural, or man-made, would be irrelevant. Our (collectively) evolved brains must respond in such a way that humanity's -- if not the world's -- survival, is assured. For yours truly, fiction should be a positive literary force, enabling a better life, for all. To enter into the world of literature, and hear, in the mind's eye, what generations before us have endured -- and, have contributed to the human society -- is to want to set down that last book, with a glimmer of hope that, perhaps, a few more generations will be able to pass, and face their future with a reasonable degree of confidence. Hopefully, they will be appreciative of our generation's efforts. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.