More on how Neo-Darwinism has it wrong again...

Author	Message
Intelligent Design Send message Joined: 9 Apr 12 Posts: 3626 Credit: 37,520 RAC: 0	Message 1540949 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:01:06 UTC - in response to Message 1540940. Last modified: 13 Jul 2014, 16:02:23 UTC Why Intelligent Design Describes the Cambrian Explosion 10 minutes... Darwin's Dilemma 1 hour and 13 minutes... The Privileged Planet 1 hour and 30 minutes.... Real scientist's, peer reviewed and in respected publications. Dr Stephen Meyer Well would you Adam & Eve it... "Stephen C. Meyer is director of the Discovery Instituteâ€™s Center for Science and Culture (CSC) and a founder both of the intelligent design (ID) movement and of the CSC." How about providing real links to other scientists with similar views NOT ASSOCIATED with the Discovery Institute! Thank you for your logical fallacy; I will add this to your vary long list. You have not had enough time to review the links, so you have not done the background work to make the baseless claim you have made here. Thank you for doing that, it makes you look very bad and I didn't have to do it myself. Just because you disagree with the findings does not make it wrong. And the second link does link other scientists with similar views, had you bothered before opening up your big mouth..., ... but I wouldn't be able to jab you in the ribs if you hadn't of been yourself..., ...thank you. Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick... ID: 1540949 ·

Sirius B Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24881 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7	Message 1540954 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:02:41 UTC - in response to Message 1540949. ... but I would be able to jab you in the ribs if you hadn't of been yourself... ...with an ice pick by chance? ID: 1540954 ·

Es99 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0	Message 1540956 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:04:50 UTC - in response to Message 1540954. ... but I would be able to jab you in the ribs if you hadn't of been yourself... ...with an ice pick by chance? He probably mistook your rib for a woman. Reality Internet Personality ID: 1540956 ·

Sirius B Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24881 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7	Message 1540961 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:06:39 UTC - in response to Message 1540956. ... but I would be able to jab you in the ribs if you hadn't of been yourself... ...with an ice pick by chance? He probably mistook your rib for a woman. Maybe that is why his dislike for women in general is showing up here, after all, we are one rib less than a woman. :-) ID: 1540961 ·

Intelligent Design Send message Joined: 9 Apr 12 Posts: 3626 Credit: 37,520 RAC: 0	Message 1540968 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:12:20 UTC More fallacy! Well done you two! Now address the topic not the messenger, thank you. Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick... ID: 1540968 ·

Sirius B Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24881 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7	Message 1540976 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:16:59 UTC - in response to Message 1540968. Last modified: 13 Jul 2014, 16:17:19 UTC Q: What has Intelligent Design & the Catholic Church got in common? A: Both have similar dogmatic doctrines. ID: 1540976 ·

Batter Up Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0	Message 1540977 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:17:09 UTC - in response to Message 1540968. More fallacy! Well done you two! Now address the topic not the messenger, thank you. Tell me ID. What sites do you frequent where that style of posting is taken seriously. ID: 1540977 ·

Sirius B Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24881 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7	Message 1540981 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:17:49 UTC - in response to Message 1540977. Discovery Institute. ID: 1540981 ·

Es99 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0	Message 1540987 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:21:18 UTC - in response to Message 1540968. More fallacy! Well done you two! Now address the topic not the messenger, thank you. No. We've won the argument and you've lost. Reality Internet Personality ID: 1540987 ·

Batter Up Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0	Message 1540988 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:22:01 UTC - in response to Message 1540976. Q: What has Intelligent Design & the Catholic Church got in common? A: Both have similar dogmatic doctrines. Notre Dame teaches ID? You people can't get over the Guy Fawkes incident can you? ID: 1540988 ·

Sirius B Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24881 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7	Message 1540993 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:25:05 UTC - in response to Message 1540988. Once more, who is "You People". When I post I often state the nationality... Are you Yanks really that ignorant & arrogant? ID: 1540993 ·

W-K 666 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19120 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67	Message 1541013 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:40:10 UTC - in response to Message 1540968. More fallacy! Well done you two! Now address the topic not the messenger, thank you. â€¨â€The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubtâ€ Bertrand Russel ID: 1541013 ·

Es99 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0	Message 1541017 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:42:50 UTC - in response to Message 1541013. More fallacy! Well done you two! Now address the topic not the messenger, thank you. â€¨â€The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubtâ€ Bertrand Russel +1 Reality Internet Personality ID: 1541017 ·

Intelligent Design Send message Joined: 9 Apr 12 Posts: 3626 Credit: 37,520 RAC: 0	Message 1541022 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:46:13 UTC - in response to Message 1540987. More fallacy! Well done you two! Now address the topic not the messenger, thank you. No. We've won the argument and you've lost. You lost the argument when you embraced fallacy... Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick... ID: 1541022 ·

Es99 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0	Message 1541031 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:50:57 UTC - in response to Message 1541022. More fallacy! Well done you two! Now address the topic not the messenger, thank you. No. We've won the argument and you've lost. You lost the argument when you embraced fallacy... No, you lost the argument when you embraced fallacy... Reality Internet Personality ID: 1541031 ·

ML1 Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 20423 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20	Message 1541035 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:56:23 UTC - in response to Message 1541031. Last modified: 13 Jul 2014, 16:56:42 UTC ... You lost the argument when you embraced fallacy... No, you lost the argument when you embraced fallacy... Ohhhh Noooooooooo... I had hoped we'd progressed from the eye-for-an-eye and tooth silliness 2000 years ago! Or is this the beginning of a new panto?! Keep searchin', Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) ID: 1541035 ·

Es99 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0	Message 1541036 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 16:58:49 UTC - in response to Message 1541035. ... You lost the argument when you embraced fallacy... No, you lost the argument when you embraced fallacy... Ohhhh Noooooooooo... I had hoped we'd progressed from the eye-for-an-eye and tooth silliness 2000 years ago! Or is this the beginning of a new panto?! Keep searchin', Martin :D I.D. had shown me the light. He has shown me that you don't actually have to put forth a valid argument before claiming victory. I shall use his method in all further interactions with him. :D Reality Internet Personality ID: 1541036 ·

bobby Send message Joined: 22 Mar 02 Posts: 2866 Credit: 17,789,109 RAC: 3	Message 1541059 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 17:29:33 UTC - in response to Message 1540949. Last modified: 13 Jul 2014, 17:31:31 UTC Why Intelligent Design Describes the Cambrian Explosion 10 minutes... Darwin's Dilemma 1 hour and 13 minutes... The Privileged Planet 1 hour and 30 minutes.... Real scientist's, peer reviewed and in respected publications. Dr Stephen Meyer Well would you Adam & Eve it... "Stephen C. Meyer is director of the Discovery Instituteâ€™s Center for Science and Culture (CSC) and a founder both of the intelligent design (ID) movement and of the CSC." How about providing real links to other scientists with similar views NOT ASSOCIATED with the Discovery Institute! Thank you for your logical fallacy; I will add this to your vary long list. You have not had enough time to review the links, so you have not done the background work to make the baseless claim you have made here. Thank you for doing that, it makes you look very bad and I didn't have to do it myself. Just because you disagree with the findings does not make it wrong. And the second link does link other scientists with similar views, had you bothered before opening up your big mouth..., ... but I wouldn't be able to jab you in the ribs if you hadn't of been yourself..., ...thank you. You're quite right, not all the contributors work for the Discovery Institute, and/or it's affiliates. Though it should be noted that some of these non-Discovery Institute contributors, for example Simon Conway Morris, do not consider Intelligent Design science. I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... ID: 1541059 ·

Batter Up Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0	Message 1541065 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 17:41:23 UTC - in response to Message 1540993. Last modified: 13 Jul 2014, 17:43:06 UTC Are you Yanks really that ignorant & arrogant? By "you Yanks" I assume you mean "you people"? The American's in the south object to being called "Yanks". I do too as I'm not from New England nor a NY Yankee fan. ID: 1541065 ·

Batter Up Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0	Message 1541071 - Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 17:50:01 UTC - in response to Message 1541031. You lost the argument when you embraced fallacy... No, you lost the argument when you embraced fallacy... This fallacy sounds like a fun date. ID: 1541071 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.