Long term missions in space may cause permanent eye damage.

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Long term missions in space may cause permanent eye damage.
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1505033 - Posted: 17 Apr 2014, 2:59:57 UTC
Last modified: 17 Apr 2014, 3:00:24 UTC

This could be something that will delay any long term manned space flight missions. It appears that microgravity increases fluid build up inside the skull which causes pressure on the eyeball. Up to 33% of astronauts who have been in space for six months or more have suffered permanent eye damage.
Here's a link to the story I read.
http://www.space.com/14876-astronaut-spaceflight-vision-problems.html
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1505033 · Report as offensive
anniet
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 14
Posts: 7105
Credit: 1,577,368
RAC: 75
Zambia
Message 1505239 - Posted: 17 Apr 2014, 16:38:45 UTC - in response to Message 1505033.  

This could be something that will delay any long term manned space flight missions. It appears that microgravity increases fluid build up inside the skull which causes pressure on the eyeball. Up to 33% of astronauts who have been in space for six months or more have suffered permanent eye damage.
Here's a link to the story I read.
http://www.space.com/14876-astronaut-spaceflight-vision-problems.html


Hmmm... :/ that's a shame. Okay... I am about to ask a potentially very stupid question... please be kind in your ridicule everyone :)

How difficult would it be to create a gravitational field within a space craft? I think it would take away quite a bit of the novelty of being in space - but - would it be possible?

I will be under my rock in rocky's cafe should the jeering get a bit loud on this one... bye :)
ID: 1505239 · Report as offensive
Batter Up
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 1946
Credit: 24,860,347
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1505260 - Posted: 17 Apr 2014, 17:13:25 UTC

Centrifugal force could be used to create 1g but this is why manned spaceflight is so much more expensive than robots and drones.
ID: 1505260 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1505747 - Posted: 18 Apr 2014, 20:12:13 UTC

Building space stations and/or spacecraft that have large centrifugal chambers where astronauts can spend time will be very expensive to construct requiring vast resources and a large fleet of craft capable of lifting the materials into orbit. Then a large cadre of skilled laborers to build it. Way in the future, I would guess.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1505747 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20289
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 1505783 - Posted: 18 Apr 2014, 21:16:18 UTC - in response to Message 1505747.  
Last modified: 18 Apr 2014, 21:19:00 UTC

Building space stations and/or spacecraft that have large centrifugal chambers where astronauts can spend time will be very expensive to construct requiring vast resources...

Sort of but not quite...


Large (high mass and/or rapidly) rotating structures are an engineering nightmare for anything that will need to be maneuvered!

Alternatively, stop/starting the rotation for maneuvers is also an expensive engineering problem...


However, for long duration space living, 2001-esq style rotating space stations are perhaps the best compromise...

Keep searchin',
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 1505783 · Report as offensive
anniet
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 14
Posts: 7105
Credit: 1,577,368
RAC: 75
Zambia
Message 1505790 - Posted: 18 Apr 2014, 21:25:59 UTC

I suppose that leaves trying to find out what the difference is between the 33% that do suffer damage and those that don't. Then factor that into the selection process before sending astronauts into microgravity environments.

Or reduce the time they're exposed.

Would still come at a cost though, but a lot less than the cost that could arise from a potentially catastrophic accident caused by poor vision
ID: 1505790 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34053
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1506002 - Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 10:47:25 UTC - in response to Message 1505239.  
Last modified: 19 Apr 2014, 10:48:39 UTC

This could be something that will delay any long term manned space flight missions. It appears that microgravity increases fluid build up inside the skull which causes pressure on the eyeball. Up to 33% of astronauts who have been in space for six months or more have suffered permanent eye damage.
Here's a link to the story I read.
http://www.space.com/14876-astronaut-spaceflight-vision-problems.html


Hmmm... :/ that's a shame. Okay... I am about to ask a potentially very stupid question... please be kind in your ridicule everyone :)

How difficult would it be to create a gravitational field within a space craft? I think it would take away quite a bit of the novelty of being in space - but - would it be possible?

I will be under my rock in rocky's cafe should the jeering get a bit loud on this one... bye :)



I think it was in the movie 'A Space Oddysey' they created gravity in the spacecraft bij a giant sort of 'ring' revolving around the craft. That's the centrifugal force Batter Up was mentioning.

Found it! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotating_wheel_space_station
rOZZ
Music
Pictures
ID: 1506002 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 1506008 - Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 10:56:28 UTC

Yes, to the tune of "Beautiful blue Danube".
Tullio
ID: 1506008 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1507075 - Posted: 22 Apr 2014, 1:22:30 UTC

Constructing a space station or a spacecraft large enough to contain a meaningful centrifuge will require resources way beyond what any government or private corporation is willing to procure in today's world economy. It may be a very long time before such vessels are built. It's not that we can't do it because I think we could but rather more like we won't do it because the perception is that the money spent is wasted on space projects. I've always maintained that the money is spent here on earth paying very smart skilled people to build our future.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1507075 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Long term missions in space may cause permanent eye damage.


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.