Message boards :
Science (non-SETI) :
SpaceX News.
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34859 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Meanwhile, why is the US government allowing itself to be held to ransom to a group of large USA companies using RUSSIAN rocket engines to push just one-way launches at greatly greater cost than the home-grown USA SpaceX can do? Because technically SpaceX flights are still "test flights". Cheers. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34859 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Look ma, no parachutes. SpaceX unveils its new spacecraft to take astronauts to the ISS and back. http://edition.cnn.com/2014/05/29/us/spacex-new-spacecraft/ The Dragon V2 got its grand reveal Thursday night by SpaceX founder Elon Musk, who showed off his company's new spacecraft in a live webcast. Cheers. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34859 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Look ma, no parachutes. It seems now that they're talking about a late 2017/early 2018 for the capsule's first flight with astronauts onboard. Cheers. |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
It's cool looking as far as capsules go. I presume it parachutes down to a point then lands with it's rocket motors. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34859 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
It's cool looking as far as capsules go. I presume it parachutes down to a point then lands with it's rocket motors. Not according to the video in the link Bob, though I was waiting for at least 1 to pop out. Cheers. |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
It's cool looking as far as capsules go. I presume it parachutes down to a point then lands with it's rocket motors. They only went up to a little over 1000ft. To descend from orbit that would require a lot of rocket fuel. At least that is what I'm thinking. From what I read they have a parachute backup system and I'm betting it does it's initial slow down from reentry via a drag chute before engaging it's rocket motors. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34859 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
It's cool looking as far as capsules go. I presume it parachutes down to a point then lands with it's rocket motors. Ah now I see were the confusion is, you're talking about the older Falcon 9-R rocket link Bob where as it's the latest link that I'm referring to and it's is for the Dragon V2 capsule, but higher test flights are also scheduled for the Falcon 9-R rocket. Cheers. |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
It's cool looking as far as capsules go. I presume it parachutes down to a point then lands with it's rocket motors. No, I was reading about the new Dragon V2 and although he mentions a parachute backup system you are right that he doesn't mention their use for a normal landing. I am skeptical about the ability to slow a capsule down enough for a soft landing on rocket power alone. I just doesn't look like there is enough room to carry enough fuel. I will be interested to see if it can accomplish this with 7 astronauts aboard. The shuttle had to do a lot of aerodynamic maneuvering to slow down from high mach to landing speed. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
I will be very happy if proven wrong but I think it is still impossible to bring down a loaded capsule from orbit with rockets alone. It defies the laws of physics in that there is no way to carry that much fuel in that small of a vehicle. Even if they throw any kind of structural safety into the trash can. I don't care if his rocket motors are 200 time more powerful than anything that has gone before. They still burn fuel and the more powerful the motor the faster it gets used up. Unless SpaceX has discovered unobtainium. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
Thunderbird 1 managed it Ok I seem to recall ..... Yeah, right. So can the X-wing fighter from Star Wars. Maybe George Lucas designed the Dragon V2. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Batter Up Send message Joined: 5 May 99 Posts: 1946 Credit: 24,860,347 RAC: 0 |
Thunderbird 1 managed it Ok I seem to recall ..... Orbiting refueling stations. |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
Seeing is believing, but going up to and landing from 3,000ft is a lot different than coming down from orbit. I think Musk is leaving something out and hopes that within three years a way will be found. My college professors taught that it takes a lot of fuel to counter the force of gravity and I will be watching eagerly when they do a complete de-orbit burn and land with just the use of rocket motors. You can only get so much energy from a given quantity of fuel. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
I would like to see some calculations showing that the Dragon V2 capsule can carry enough fuel for a powered descent from orbit with a full load of astronauts and their gear. And a description of the fuel. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
I can't find it now but someone mentioned that a rocket descending only needs to overcome a terminal velocity of 120 mph. That speed is only roughly true for a human being. The acceleration of gravity increases until the drag of the falling object matches the pull of gravity and mass and that is terminal velocity. I am sure the terminal velocity of the dragon space craft is much higher than 120 mph. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34859 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
The latest SpaceX news is that they will build their 1st commercial launchpad in Texas. http://www.dailytech.com/Texas+Chosen+as+Site+for+SpaceXs+First+Commercial+Launchpad/article36340.htm According to Gov. Rick Perry (R-Texas), the state of Texas is paying $2.3 million USD from the Texas Enterprise Fund to bring SpaceX's launchpad -- which is the world's first commercial launchpad -- to the state. Cheers. |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
The latest SpaceX news is that they will build their 1st commercial launchpad in Texas. \\Oh good, that means that if they have a launch failure Florida will be in the fallout area. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Darth Beaver Send message Joined: 20 Aug 99 Posts: 6728 Credit: 21,443,075 RAC: 3 |
\\Oh good, that means that if they have a launch failure Florida will be in the fallout area. Good 1 Bob :) It is private enterprise so a good chance of it happening .......the mighty dollars rules |
Darth Beaver Send message Joined: 20 Aug 99 Posts: 6728 Credit: 21,443,075 RAC: 3 |
Bob i think you will find they wont need to fire the engines for long and things like Parachutes and it's own drag will slow it down enough before it has to use the engines only thing to care full about is the -G's !7,000 mph is not as fast as a comet or meteorite so depending on how they can control the descent Space - X should be able to do . Lockheed Martin have experimented with it N.A.S.A has to |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
Bob i think you will find they wont need to fire the engines for long and things like Parachutes and it's own drag will slow it down enough before it has to use the engines only thing to care full about is the -G's What I'd be afraid of is a massive launch failure. The crew compartment would detach but the booster would fall on a parabolic arc. That's why the built the NASA launch facility on the east coast of Florida. In case of a failure debris falls in the ocean. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Darth Beaver Send message Joined: 20 Aug 99 Posts: 6728 Credit: 21,443,075 RAC: 3 |
When i read it was Texas i was wondering isan't that the wrong place myself but for different reason. Isn't Florida AKA the "Cape" closer to the equator ? The closer you are the less fuel you use , something to do with the earths rotation giving you a boost ...? |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.