How is a candidate signal first reported to staff scientists?

Message boards : SETI@home Science : How is a candidate signal first reported to staff scientists?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

AuthorMessage
Michael Watson

Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 08
Posts: 1385
Credit: 2,098,506
RAC: 5
Message 1429027 - Posted: 16 Oct 2013, 0:18:02 UTC

For all we know, the delay in hearing from extraterrestrials may be due to their ideas about when contact with us should occur, rather than their rarity, or their distance from us. We may have to cross some threshold of development and/or preparation before we're deemed ready.
ID: 1429027 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1429123 - Posted: 16 Oct 2013, 5:26:03 UTC - in response to Message 1429027.  

For all we know, the delay in hearing from extraterrestrials may be due to their ideas about when contact with us should occur, rather than their rarity, or their distance from us. We may have to cross some threshold of development and/or preparation before we're deemed ready.

Given our track record if I were them no contact with earth would be permitted under pain of death. We are too unprepared for interstellar relations.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1429123 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34053
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1429161 - Posted: 16 Oct 2013, 7:28:53 UTC

So many questions will perhaps remain unanswered. We can only hope for the best for now.
rOZZ
Music
Pictures
ID: 1429161 · Report as offensive
Michael Watson

Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 08
Posts: 1385
Credit: 2,098,506
RAC: 5
Message 1429305 - Posted: 16 Oct 2013, 15:51:28 UTC
Last modified: 16 Oct 2013, 15:52:17 UTC

We don't appear to be able to put ourselves in the place of extraterrestrials contemplating contact with Earth. How could we know what they, an entirely different species and culture, would view as adequate preparation on our part? It's possible that we could be harsher judges of ourselves than they would be, or more pessimistic about how we would cope with their presence.
ID: 1429305 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1429314 - Posted: 16 Oct 2013, 16:19:32 UTC - in response to Message 1429305.  
Last modified: 16 Oct 2013, 16:20:38 UTC

If they could detect us then it is likely that we could detect them. It is unlikely that anyone else knows that we are here. It is possible that no one else will ever know. If we were beaming a message at promising directions in the Cosmos then maybe the chances would be greater of getting a return message.
ID: 1429314 · Report as offensive
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22219
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1429319 - Posted: 16 Oct 2013, 16:38:21 UTC
Last modified: 16 Oct 2013, 16:46:07 UTC

Earth has been "radio bright" for a little over 100 years. For the first third of that time it was a pretty dull glimmer, but then rapidly got quite a bit brighter, first with the advent of national and international radio broadcasting, then with advent of television, radar. Realistically any feedback would come from a civilisation that had been performing a survey over many years observing this increase in activity, in much the same way as we are doing in SETI@Home. If we assume that for the first few years we were too dim to be observable, then the radius at which we could be observed, and a message sent back is 50 light years There are 1875 stars within 50 light years of earth, which is a pretty small number when considering the number of stars in the universe.

(Edit to correct number of stars - I looked at a list of "naked eye stars", not a full list)
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1429319 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34053
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1429329 - Posted: 16 Oct 2013, 17:14:47 UTC
Last modified: 16 Oct 2013, 17:16:27 UTC

ID: 1429329 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1429330 - Posted: 16 Oct 2013, 17:16:10 UTC - in response to Message 1429319.  

1875 stars within 50 light years of earth


Many of these are binary stars and many are not main sequence stars such as our Sun.
ID: 1429330 · Report as offensive
Michael Watson

Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 08
Posts: 1385
Credit: 2,098,506
RAC: 5
Message 1429426 - Posted: 16 Oct 2013, 22:31:23 UTC
Last modified: 16 Oct 2013, 22:55:58 UTC

About 90 percent of those 1875 stars are on the main sequence. Many wide binary stars could have stable planets orbiting around either star, and close binaries could have such planets circling both. http://www.space.com/22437-main-sequence-stars.html
http://www.solstation.com/habitable.htm
ID: 1429426 · Report as offensive
Michael Watson

Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 08
Posts: 1385
Credit: 2,098,506
RAC: 5
Message 1429456 - Posted: 16 Oct 2013, 23:13:53 UTC - in response to Message 1429314.  
Last modified: 16 Oct 2013, 23:15:20 UTC

If they could detect us then it is likely that we could detect them. It is unlikely that anyone else knows that we are here. It is possible that no one else will ever know. If we were beaming a message at promising directions in the Cosmos then maybe the chances would be greater of getting a return message.
Make a new instrument, double the size of the largest radio telescope (Arecibo), and sensitivity goes up four times. Even the new 500 meter radio telescope China is building won't be able to match that for sensitivity. Double the size again and sensitivity goes up 16 fold. This doesn't seem too much to hope for from a civilization thousands, or millions of years more technically advanced than our own.
ID: 1429456 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1429617 - Posted: 17 Oct 2013, 9:33:16 UTC - in response to Message 1429426.  

Many wide binary stars could have stable planets orbiting around either star


For intelligent, communicating (electronically) life to form, The orbit must be stable, the planet cannot wobble on its axis and the orbit must be nearly circular.
ID: 1429617 · Report as offensive
Josef W. Segur
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 4504
Credit: 1,414,761
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1429781 - Posted: 17 Oct 2013, 17:35:46 UTC - in response to Message 1429617.  

Many wide binary stars could have stable planets orbiting around either star


For intelligent, communicating (electronically) life to form, The orbit must be stable, the planet cannot wobble on its axis and the orbit must be nearly circular.

Intelligence is developed as a means to adapt to varying conditions. It might be that extreme variability of environment would make intelligence develop sooner.

The "life as we know it" concept must be our baseline in thinking about extraterrestrial life, but it is probably a mistake to think our environment is typical.
                                                                   Joe
ID: 1429781 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34053
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1429784 - Posted: 17 Oct 2013, 17:41:57 UTC

but it is probably a mistake to think our environment is typical.


Or authentic for that matter...
rOZZ
Music
Pictures
ID: 1429784 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1429926 - Posted: 17 Oct 2013, 22:29:40 UTC - in response to Message 1429784.  
Last modified: 17 Oct 2013, 22:30:06 UTC

Since the primal elements appear to be the same throughout the universe, many believe that intelligent life would be carbon-based and be very much like has happened on Earth.

I think that they would have to be more advanced than we are since I think it would take any signal from them tens of thousands of years to reach us.

It would be thrilling to find out if any of these suppositions is true or false.
ID: 1429926 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34053
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1445023 - Posted: 21 Nov 2013, 14:33:56 UTC

It would be thrilling to find out if any of these suppositions is true or false.


+1
rOZZ
Music
Pictures
ID: 1445023 · Report as offensive
Profile Lynn Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 00
Posts: 14162
Credit: 79,603,650
RAC: 123
United States
Message 1445283 - Posted: 21 Nov 2013, 22:31:04 UTC - in response to Message 1445279.  

The "Men in Black" do exist. The "Men in Black" official name is the "Majestic 12" commissioned by Harry Truman. Its a Federal entity which means they are governed by the Taxpayers, secretly of course.


+1 for The "Men in Black".


ID: 1445283 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34053
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1445296 - Posted: 21 Nov 2013, 22:50:07 UTC - in response to Message 1445283.  

The "Men in Black" do exist. The "Men in Black" official name is the "Majestic 12" commissioned by Harry Truman. Its a Federal entity which means they are governed by the Taxpayers, secretly of course.


+1 for The "Men in Black".




+ 2 and only for that
rOZZ
Music
Pictures
ID: 1445296 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 1445329 - Posted: 22 Nov 2013, 0:10:02 UTC - in response to Message 1445279.  

The "Men in Black" do exist. The "Men in Black" official name is the "Majestic 12" commissioned by Harry Truman. Its a Federal entity which means they are governed by the Taxpayers, secretly of course.


Any evidence for this? Or is this another "I know someone on the inside"?
ID: 1445329 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34053
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1450621 - Posted: 6 Dec 2013, 13:51:22 UTC

ID: 1450621 · Report as offensive
Profile Lynn Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 00
Posts: 14162
Credit: 79,603,650
RAC: 123
United States
Message 1451657 - Posted: 9 Dec 2013, 1:30:30 UTC - in response to Message 1450621.  

Thanks Julie, for the article.

When and IF we encounter an Alien, don't think any one of those things will apply.


ID: 1451657 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

Message boards : SETI@home Science : How is a candidate signal first reported to staff scientists?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.