Message boards :
SETI@home Science :
How is a candidate signal first reported to staff scientists?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Dave Send message Joined: 27 May 09 Posts: 54 Credit: 1,932,495 RAC: 1 |
Hello everyone, First, thanks to everyone who's helped me in the past with answers to what are likely basic questions. I appreciate your patience. I have another question, although it may only be aswerable by a SETI@Home staffer. Let me set up a brief scenario... One morning, a SETI@Home scientist arrives at work. Overnight, a very interesting signal is detected, so now the SETI@Home system has the data stored away. How is the scientist (or multiple people) notified? Does the system generate an email that goes out to certain people, advising them of the find and the details? Some other method? I'm only concerned with that initial notification, not subsequent analysis and debate. So how is a living, breathing human first made aware of a candidate signal? I'm writing a screenplay that I hope to shoot on my own, and I want to make the science as realistic as possible. My feeling is that SETI in general is exciting enough on its own that Hollywood-esque embellishments really aren't necessary. Dave |
Dave Send message Joined: 27 May 09 Posts: 54 Credit: 1,932,495 RAC: 1 |
EDIT: I just found the NTPCkr FAQ page which clarifies things a little, mainly that it's not a lightning bolt moment of discovery. So let me ask this (and again, this may be an ananswerable question, but even a vague answer would help) - at what point in the signal vetting process is the champagne poured? |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
If a signal is found that is of obvious intelligence and not of local origin, it needs to be detected more than once to rule out an anomaly. Then it will be sent out to other SETI scientists to confirm (peer review and all that). It will be about that time that the celebrations can begin. [Edit] I don't think my answer is what you were looking for, however. The thing is, there are lots of interesting signals found and returned. It's not like all the data returned comes up completely blank and something is triggered once a signal is found. The only way the celebrations can begin is to have the debate and to rule out all other possibilities first through peer review. The truth is, as exciting as important findings are, the actual process to confirm things in science is quite boring, tedious, and time consuming, all as a necessary evil to be certain that the finding is accurate. The reason why Hollywood tends to embellish things is to make them much more exciting to watch in a 2 hour period. Though I am not a Project Scientist, so my answer is definitely not authoritative, though I would guess quite close to the truth. |
Dave Send message Joined: 27 May 09 Posts: 54 Credit: 1,932,495 RAC: 1 |
Hi Volunteer tester, Yours is a helpful answer, so thank you! With what you've provided and what I've found here on the site (sometimes I post too soon, usually out of impatient curiousity) give me a good direction to go as far as the procederal aspects of SETI are concerned. I've been happily plowing through the mainstream books on the subject, so I'm getting a well-rounded if not very deep education in the subject. I've found that astronomers and related, professional or otherwise, seem to be about the most philosophical and optimistic group of people I've had the pleasure of getting to know. Dave |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
If a signal is found that is of obvious intelligence And just how is this determined?? |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
If a signal is found that is of obvious intelligence I would imagine by finding a signal among the noise of space that does not occur naturally and is repeated over time from the same position. |
Dave Send message Joined: 27 May 09 Posts: 54 Credit: 1,932,495 RAC: 1 |
Hopefully, in what I've developed so far for the story, it'll be obvious it's an artificial signal. It could be that I'd be bending reality a bit in this area, but I "sort of" "kind of" got a thumbs-up on it being at least not so unrealistic as to induce nausea in the scientific community. ; ) Dave |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
If a signal is found that is of obvious intelligence That "obvious intelligence" or "does not occur naturally" criteria is likely to be hard to pin down. Much as we may wish for something clear, I suspect there will be room for skeptics to raise doubts. Joe |
Lynn Send message Joined: 20 Nov 00 Posts: 14162 Credit: 79,603,650 RAC: 123 |
If a signal is found that is of obvious intelligence If a signal is found that is of obvious intelligence The men in black would show up at his door. _______________________________________________ Voyager 1 exits solar system; let's hope aliens bring it back. Lynn |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
Assuming they exist, why would the Men in Black care about a signal? |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
There would have to be some demodulation or close inspection of the signal to find the intelligence. It may be an on-off signal that counts out the prime numbers. This inspection should be done on every signal as it comes in. I would presume autocorrelation to lift the signal out of the noise. Next, a quick comparison with a bit map of known artificial signals from earth ; or a known stellar phenomenon (pulsars etc). Then the inspection for any information content in the signal. It would be a mistake to wait and see if this signal re-appears after a long wait between scans before analyzing it in this way. Known modulation schemes would be tried out to see if there were other than noise or a constant, non varying tone ? The "carrier" might occur at microwave or optical frequencies. I would look at the Lyman hydrogen line or this frequency times π. |
Michael Watson Send message Joined: 7 Feb 08 Posts: 1384 Credit: 2,098,506 RAC: 5 |
A digital signal would be the most likely to still be understandable, in the face of any noise or distortion, or merely the weakness of the signal. The problem of knowing the digital format of the signal could be solved by making it very simple. It may not be thought of as such, but Morse code, the original signal format in radio, was also the first digital mode. It is made up of impulses of two fixed lengths, combinations of which are assigned to letters, numbers, and punctuation marks. The simple turning on and off of the radio emission in some mathematical sequence would seem appropriate, where neither species knows the other's language. If another species in space is sending out radio signals, they are very likely to be technically proficient. They would also be very likely to understand mathematics. If we received the following sequence of on/off radio impulses we would be justified in concluding that they were from a form of intelligence at lest equal to our own: one pulse, one pulse, two pulses, three pulses, five pulses, eight pulses, thirteen pulses, twenty one pulses . . . I trust that their significance is obvious. These might be preferable to the often discussed prime numbers, as they are not only an additive series, but also converge on the expression of a mathematical ratio seen frequently in both geometry, and in concrete objects in the natural world. |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
I still can't understand with all the ineptitude and incompetence shown by our world governments that people can still believe there's some super-secret organization out there that will block such a major finding from the entire world. The bigger the secret, the hard it is to keep. There's no way it could be kept from everyone. |
Lynn Send message Joined: 20 Nov 00 Posts: 14162 Credit: 79,603,650 RAC: 123 |
I still can't understand with all the ineptitude and incompetence shown by our world governments that people can still believe there's some super-secret organization out there that will block such a major finding from the entire world. Assuming they exist, why would the Men in Black care about a signal? Please read, Sten-Arne post. He summed it up pretty good. Voyager 1 exits solar system, let's hope aliens bring it back. Lynn |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
I still can't understand with all the ineptitude and incompetence shown by our world governments that people can still believe there's some super-secret organization out there that will block such a major finding from the entire world. I did read Sten's post, and I offered my view on it. IMO, it is an illogical position to take. |
Lynn Send message Joined: 20 Nov 00 Posts: 14162 Credit: 79,603,650 RAC: 123 |
I still can't understand with all the ineptitude and incompetence shown by our world governments that people can still believe there's some super-secret organization out there that will block such a major finding from the entire world. http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/about_seti/about_seti_at_home_5.htmlexplains what will happen. That's is the best i can do. ________________________________________ Voyager 1 exits solar system, let's hope aliens bring it back. Lynn |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
I still can't understand with all the ineptitude and incompetence shown by our world governments that people can still believe there's some super-secret organization out there that will block such a major finding from the entire world. ...and that's a good answer that doesn't invoke the "Men in Black" fallacy. However, I wasn't the one asking the question. :-) |
Lynn Send message Joined: 20 Nov 00 Posts: 14162 Credit: 79,603,650 RAC: 123 |
I still can't understand with all the ineptitude and incompetence shown by our world governments that people can still believe there's some super-secret organization out there that will block such a major finding from the entire world. Volunteer tester, fair enough. Men in grey, etc. Someone will show up. However, I wasn't the one asking the question. :-)[/quote] :-) |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
Volunteer tester, fair enough. Men in grey, etc. Someone will show up. No, no one is going to show up to do anything like what has been suggested. That article you linked to does not support that statement or feeling. Taken from that page: All information about the discovery will be made public, probably via the web. No country or individual would be allowed to jam the frequency the signal is observed on. Since the object will rise and set as seen from any given location, observations from radio observatories around the world will be necessary. This will, by necessity, be a multi-national effort. All this information will be made public. (My emphasis added) |
Michael Watson Send message Joined: 7 Feb 08 Posts: 1384 Credit: 2,098,506 RAC: 5 |
We're told that a candidate SETI signal would be shared with other observers throughout the world before it could even be ascertained whether it was the genuine article or not. Even if the the original discoverers were silenced, how could this been done throughout the world, to all the others, who had been brought into the confirmation process? Or are we to assume a covert worldwide government is intent on concealing the fact that there is other intelligent life in the universe? If the suppressing agency moves proactively against possible SETI signals, before they can be confirmed, we should have seen them do so already. There have been several cases where a signal was found that could have turned out to be the real thing. As far as I can discover, no one has been 'disappeared' because of these. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.