> Thanks to your replies, now I've got it clear for myself :) I would rather
> suggest to listen as well to the mostly used frequencies (quite logical,
> IMHO), but this will increase the WU amount... huh... I want SETI to be too
> perfect :)
>
> Btw, how are the stats of analysis? Are we in-time or is data amount for
> analysis growing?
>
>
> Greetings from Rep. of Georgia :)
>
We listen already to the frequencies that we CAN hear here on earth, the results are in the WU's you are crunching...(thats why I mentioned the waterhole).
If you are to sent a signal to somewhere else I reckon that you would omit as much disturbance and avoid as much attenuation as you could, hence the waterhole is golden...

Greetings from Belgium ;-))

---