Result listing not updated?

Message boards : Number crunching : Result listing not updated?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
tuxnl

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 04
Posts: 10
Credit: 1,051,733
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 38566 - Posted: 20 Oct 2004, 16:09:54 UTC

One of my hosts (269106) is running a couple of day's now, and has completed some work. But if i look at the results on the website, they are not there? The wu's still are with server status 'in progress' and newer download wu's are not in the list.
Same thing happend with an other host (157286), which i have taken from the project because it never got any credit for work done.
Do i have to change something or is it just a server which is behind with processing data?
ID: 38566 · Report as offensive
Profile Scribe
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Nov 00
Posts: 137
Credit: 35,235
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 38573 - Posted: 20 Oct 2004, 16:40:31 UTC

If they show as Ready to Report on your work Tab then you need to Update to get them to register.
ID: 38573 · Report as offensive
tuxnl

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 04
Posts: 10
Credit: 1,051,733
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 38745 - Posted: 21 Oct 2004, 7:25:40 UTC - in response to Message 38573.  

> If they show as Ready to Report on your work Tab then you need to Update to
> get them to register.
>

I'm running CLI versions, so i don't have tab's, but the WU's get send back, so berkeley should have those somewhere? All systems are running the same boinc version, so there is no differance there.
ID: 38745 · Report as offensive
tuxnl

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 04
Posts: 10
Credit: 1,051,733
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 38748 - Posted: 21 Oct 2004, 7:44:55 UTC - in response to Message 38745.  

> I'm running CLI versions, so i don't have tab's, but the WU's get send back,
> so berkeley should have those somewhere? All systems are running the same
> boinc version, so there is no differance there.
>
When restarting the client this morning, i started the client on this host (269106) with an '-update_prefs'. Now all work is registerd, and some even got credited imidately.
So what would happen if i did't do the update, all processing time would be lost???? This sounds like a bug to me.
ID: 38748 · Report as offensive
TPR_Mojo
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 Apr 00
Posts: 323
Credit: 7,001,052
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 38758 - Posted: 21 Oct 2004, 8:53:18 UTC - in response to Message 38748.  

> When restarting the client this morning, i started the client on this host
> (269106) with an '-update_prefs'. Now all work is registerd, and some even got
> credited imidately.
> So what would happen if i did't do the update, all processing time would be
> lost???? This sounds like a bug to me.
>

try adding the parameter -return_results_immediately to your command line and all results shoud be uploaded and the sceduler called as soon as each work unit completes.
ID: 38758 · Report as offensive
Profile Toby
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Oct 00
Posts: 1005
Credit: 6,366,949
RAC: 0
United States
Message 38766 - Posted: 21 Oct 2004, 9:37:18 UTC

I would point you to Paul's website but he seems to have changed this particular part and it doesn't really give an answer at the moment...

Anyway, returning work is a 2 step proces. After a work unit finishes, the result file is immediatly uploaded. But the work unit isn't "reported" to the scheduler automatically. The scheduler is what initiates the credit granting process. Your client will automatically contact the scheduler if 1) there are work units within 24 hours of their report deadline in your queue or 2) your cache 'low water mark' has been reached and your client requests more work. The -return_results_immediately switch causes the client to contact the scheduler every time a work unit finishes to avoid the possible delay.
A member of The Knights Who Say NI!
For rankings, history graphs and more, check out:
My BOINC stats site
ID: 38766 · Report as offensive
Ron Roe
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 28 Feb 02
Posts: 156
Credit: 24,124
RAC: 0
United States
Message 38788 - Posted: 21 Oct 2004, 12:49:38 UTC - in response to Message 38748.  
Last modified: 3 Nov 2004, 22:02:12 UTC

> So what would happen if i did't do the update, all processing time would be
> lost???? This sounds like a bug to me.
>

No not a bug, a system design flaw. By making it a 2 step process it increases the chances of something going wrong. But thats the Programmer/System Designer in me talking.

Anyways Toby is correct it would have reported the results when it contacted the scheduler for more work.

Try using BoincView it will allow you to see all the computers on your network and control BOINC from one computer.

ID: 38788 · Report as offensive
Profile Paul D. Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 00
Posts: 3898
Credit: 1,158,042
RAC: 0
United States
Message 38816 - Posted: 21 Oct 2004, 14:47:57 UTC - in response to Message 38766.  

> I would point you to Paul's website but he seems to have changed this
> particular part and it doesn't really give an answer at the moment...

Who? Me? ... What did I do? What did I do?

The site is still up and running (or at least it was when I touched it ...

*I*, however, was off line for nearly 3 days because of an issue with my cable modem. That got fixed yesterday and I have been back since then.

> Anyway, returning work is a 2 step proces. After a work unit finishes, the
> result file is immediatly uploaded. But the work unit isn't "reported" to the
> scheduler automatically. The scheduler is what initiates the credit granting
> process. Your client will automatically contact the scheduler if 1) there are
> work units within 24 hours of their report deadline in your queue or 2) your
> cache 'low water mark' has been reached and your client requests more work.
> The -return_results_immediately switch causes the client to contact the
> scheduler every time a work unit finishes to avoid the possible delay.

And you filled in very well ...

ID: 38816 · Report as offensive
Profile Steve Cressman
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 02
Posts: 583
Credit: 65,644
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 38833 - Posted: 21 Oct 2004, 16:00:54 UTC
Last modified: 21 Oct 2004, 16:04:53 UTC

@Paul
I noticed over at BoincStats that you where trying to setup one of their sigs. I like their sigs too. Here is your sig. You help us enough, now I help you. :)



P.S. Hope you are doing better. :)


98SE XP2500+ @ 2.1 GHz Boinc v5.8.8

And God said"Let there be light."But then the program crashed because he was trying to access the 'light' property of a NULL universe pointer.
ID: 38833 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Result listing not updated?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.