In my former thread about finding the link between gravity and electromagnetism,which has been locked so i had to start these one i stated that.

electrons command atoms how to fold space and the direction to fold it in,which direction is determined by presence of heavier body whose goal is to achieve equilibrium in direction of resonance.

question is what property of electron can fold space ,i think it could be that it has momentum due to fact that its osscilating?

Now i have got what could actually support the theory above and it states that

Each proton is a tiny magnet, as is an electron, so a magnet will exert a small force on them.

That means gravity is what we see due to the fact that atoms (with electron and protons) and nuclei with(protons) have a natural built in guidance system i.e the electron and proton which tends to naturally search and guide them towards other atoms and nuclei


earth the great magnet

Thus solving the mystery what gravity actually is.

So what happens when a body approaches a very strong gravitational field ,its that it trigers that guidance mechanism to the extreme by increasing the frequency of resonance towards that body speeding it up towards it. Has anyone seen any features of anything flux lines,force field lines like those near a magnetic field near
huge gravitational bodies? The answer is no. So for those of you hoping to detect Gravitational waves forget it ,it just never goner happen.

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy

Gravity is the warping of space and the fact that objects seek the lowest energy levels and move along geodesics.
. Gravity waves will be found when the interferometer is moved to outer space.

Magnets do work because of the electromagnetic repulsion of the protons at the ends of the magnet.

---

Thats what huge gravity causes or what we see ,we need an explanation interms
of the basic components of atomes like electrons and protons and neutrons or even better to the level of the quarks i.e the six basic qurks the up ,the down etc because there is a reason why there different quarks in different directions they govern the whole process the directional reasonance of electron and protons the movement of electron around the atom. They old saying that gravity warps space is fine but its like saying that magnets attract iron which is true but how do they do it at atomic or subatomic level. The discoverey of how gravitational force acts at subatomic level is the answer to all questions like 1)can this be reversed to our benefit by electrical or magnetic forces, 2)is there a concept of gravitational waves because they way i see it there non and we are suching for an illusion.3)can changes in the direction of those qarks and how the are held produce different properties of matter not like we see on earth i.e the famous dark matter .Thats were all of us should be focusing on until we get to it ,searching blindly for things we just dream of is pointless because that puts us at a level of a labarotory rat trying to find its way around the maze.
zerre theory

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy

If you read the Zerre theory below carefully ,you would clearly see how the neutron structure consists of a pyramid of negative z-quarks and positive z-quarks that keep on interchanging i.e the negative pyramid grows and the positive pyramid shrinks and the reverse occurs later just like the pumping of our hearts .While the proton structure has a positive z-quark at the center and is stable and there is alot more about the electron in detail though the english is poor, never the less it shows you that the overall structure is a pyramid .What is special about the pyramid that can explain the sub atomic particles playing arole in gravity is that a pyramid has direction i.e the tip and if that direction points in a given direction in all atoms on a given isolated body then that gives us a big clue.Secondly i stated that what actually gives atoms there property to seek one anther is a property called directional resonance,which can actually be deduced from that theory at subatomic level.I just wish i had done physics instead of medicine cause it would have been so much easier for me what a great mistake i made in my life.

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy

Gravity seems to Me to be a side of effect of Mass, The more You have, The more You have, Therefore no graviton particle(Which no one has yet found at all still).

---

The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's

Though many may think of my idea of gravity and electromagnetism pointless. its actually very interesting taking your mind to places others have not been to or have been to and got lost. Actually the whole issue is quit simple and not at all difficult. What i forgot to clarify in the last post is what i am thinking, is that on a given isolated body like earth in the nucleus all the dual tetrahedrons or lets just simply say pyramids have a particular direction and this direction affects the way the outer electrons move around all the atoms on that isolated body, in this case the earth. Now on anther isolated body the pyramids are in anther direction hence, they affect their electrons towards that direction different from that of earth. But as soon as that body comes to a certain distance from earth lets say which is a heavier one. its pyramids begin to change direction within the nucleus and hence its outer electrons begin to change direction, so as to achieve harmony in direction like those on earth. But change in direction of those electrons changes the motion of that body towards the earth
and when that body is in contact with the earth then all its pyramids are in the same direction as those of the earth and its electrons are all having a resonance as those of earth. Now thats my explanation of how gravity really works , we just have to check it out physists can easily compare the direction of the dual tetrahedrons on earth and in outer space and see by how much degrees they differ .

I WOULD CALL IT THE COSMIC COMPASS

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy

Want to know what other theories are out their about unification ,want to scratch your head abid ? decide is it fact or fiction



unification theory by BRENT HERBERT

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy

Albert Einstein tried to unify gravitation and electromagnetism by his Unified field theory. It failed because it did not include quantum mechanics, which he disliked because "God does not play dice". So far nobody has been able to conjugate the two XX Century great theories, But Einstein's criticism of quantum mechanics has opened a new field of research (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, 1935). All this must be taken into account by any new theory.
Tullio

---

Thanks alot ,i guess it might take me a week to clearly understand EPR, ITS SEEMS abit difficult.

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy

"Subtle is the Lord but not malicious" Albert Einstein.

---

Unifying gravity and electromagnetism using analogies based on electromagnetism for gravity

These abstract is very interesting. Truth or fiction ?

Abstract:
Gravity and electromagnetism are unified at the level of a 4-potential by re-examining the most obvious choice at the Lagrangian level

The GEM Lagrangian has mass and electric current densities coupled to the 4-potential with different signs: like charges attract for gravity and repel for electromagnetism. A four-dimensional wave equation results by varying the action with respect to the potential:

MATHIMATICAL RELATION AVAILABLE AT ORIGINAL SITE.


Conclusion

Using a nineteenth century approach, an effort to unify physics from the twentieth century has been attempted. A dynamic metric equation is found but it uses a simpler set of field equations than general relativity, a rank one tensor instead of two.

This theory makes several predictions. If weak gravitation effects are measured to second-order parameterized post-Newtonian accuracy, light will bend around the Sun 0.7 microarcseconds more than the Schwarzschild metric predicts. It remains to be seen if the complete 3-force equation matches all the data for a thin spiral galaxy. The polarization of gravitational waves will be scalar or longitudinal, not transverse as predicted by general relativity. A linear field theory for gravity can work elegantly beside the intellectual superstructure of electromagnetism, using analogy to complete the story of forces in Nature.

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy

Black holes are formed from dieing stars that are 8-20 times our suns weight, black holes are said to emiit hawkings radiation (energy), Now we know for fact that black holes consume physical mass. Now energy can neither be created or destroyed ,but mass can be converted into energy.What puzzles me is our universe getting lighter by slowly being converted into energy or is the radiation that we see due to the fact that black holes do possess some kind of magnetic effect and thus induce high currents in electrons around them as is a fact around neutron stars and pulsers. What is your bet ?????

MYSTERY OF BLACK HOLES

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy

How about the missing 95%of the universe could it have long been converted into energy by these so called hawkings radiation in supermassive black holes ?

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy

BEYOND THE POINT PARTICLE

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy

First black hole for light created on Earth






An electromagnetic "black holeMovie Camera" that sucks in surrounding light has been built for the first time.

The device, which works at microwave frequencies, may soon be extended to trap visible light, leading to an entirely new way of harvesting solar energy to generate electricity.

A theoretical design for a table-top black hole to trap light was proposed in a paper published earlier this year by Evgenii Narimanov and Alexander Kildishev of Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. Their idea was to mimic the properties of a cosmological black hole, whose intense gravity bends the surrounding space-time, causing any nearby matter or radiation to follow the warped space-time and spiral inwards.

Narimanov and Kildishev reasoned that it should be possible to build a device that makes light curve inwards towards its centre in a similar way. They calculated that this could be done by a cylindrical structure consisting of a central core surrounded by a shell of concentric rings.

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy

Black holes are formed from dieing stars that are 8-20 times our suns weight, black holes are said to emiit hawkings radiation (energy), Now we know for fact that black holes consume physical mass. Now energy can neither be created or destroyed ,but mass can be converted into energy.What puzzles me is our universe getting lighter by slowly being converted into energy or is the radiation that we see due to the fact that black holes do possess some kind of magnetic effect and thus induce high currents in electrons around them as is a fact around neutron stars and pulsers. What is your bet ?????

MYSTERY OF BLACK HOLES

Well E=mc^2 is probably the most popular and the most misunderstood equation in modern physics. It does not mean that mass can be converted into energy and not back. You can write the equation as m=E/c^2, too. What the equation really says is that mass and energy are equivalent, roughly said, they are the same thing. Every body of matter has the so called rest energy and every type of energy has mass, too. E.G. photons have no rest mass but get a mass through the energy they are containing. That's why they can actually transfer momentum (the product of mass and speed), an effect known as radiation pressure ,which prevents stars from collapsing as long as the fusion is still working.

A popular explanation of why nuclear reactions set free such a high amount of energy is, that they convert part of the atom's mass into energy and because c^2 is such a incredible high number that the amount of energy is that high. Well, if you read what I wrote above, you could easily use that explanation on normal chemical reactions, too. The amount of mass that a molecule gets or looses through a chemical reaction is just that low, that it can not be measured by any means. The correct explanation goes the other way round: Because strong interaction (the force that holds an atom's core together) is the strongest known force in physics, nuclear reactions set free a high amount of energy. The amount of energy per atom is that high, that the mass it looses with the energy, can actually be measured.

Finally I want to point out, that all elements that are heavier than iron have a higher mass per nucleon than iron itself. So, if such heavy elements are formed during a supernova, you can interpret that as a conversion of energy into mass.

I know that the equation goes both ways thats why there is an equals sign, But may be to shed more light on that puzzle that i have is by putting it these way. There is consumption of physical matter ,thats known .what is not clear how ever is where in the universe this energy or particles emitted are converted back to physical matter. you cant say in the supernova because for a star to form it must first of all collect enough physical matter, not energy. i think lets leave mass out of it for clarity.

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy

Thanks everyone once more, and though i didnt get the answers to my last post except from wulf 21 about how the universe converts free energy into physical mass except that ,that was created by the so called big bang ,Think i will continue and ask anther question.WULF 21 THANKS ALOT.

Ever since humans learnt of the universe beyond our earth, they have wanted to travel at the speed of light. Now every physist will tell you that ,thats impossible well may be, but it also depends on how hard you would want to travel at that speed and if you really interested into going into the Abyss of physics were ideas are put forward ,debated, and experiments done.

Well i will tell you one thing, iTS POSSIBLE TO TRAVEL AT THAT SPEED. Here is were the secret may lie. Many will argue if a electron is a particle or a wave, but thats besides the point,though i believe it is a particle.

Now an electron cant travel at the speed of light - True
a positron cant travel at the speed of light - True
but when you combine an electron with a positron what would you get, and thats elementary physics, The answer is a PHOTON. Now the the photon travels at that speed with minimum energy. So may be the reason why we believe that we cant travel at that speed is because we know so little about its properties in detail

well the photon has an electric and a magnetic field as it propergates, which of the two particles is responsible for which field ,or are the roles interchanging, What holds they two together to form a photon. And if the electron and its opposite the positron were waves wouldnt they virtual cancel one anther ? Well just thinking of how to get you an i to the other galaxy any critism, additions, corrections are well come.

If you understand the physics of that small particle called a photon, i a sure you will some day travel at that speed with minimum energy but i will stop here for today and see what the physists say .

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy

Are we lost in Translation when it comes to singularities and there existence

watch the video.

GR VIDEO ARGUMENTS

---

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy