Card model & Time to complete

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : Card model & Time to complete
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile BigWaveSurfer

Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 01
Posts: 186
Credit: 36,311,381
RAC: 141
United States
Message 863368 - Posted: 8 Feb 2009, 1:04:40 UTC

EVGA Nvidia 9600 GT KO

256-bit (700MHz clock)
512MB GDDR3 Memory (950MHz clock - 1900MHz effective)
1773MHz Shader Clock
64 Stream Processors
60GB / second memory bandwidth

Seems to be pushing through a cuda unit in about just under 30 minutes.

Just curious what others results are?
ID: 863368 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 863442 - Posted: 8 Feb 2009, 8:50:18 UTC - in response to Message 863368.  
Last modified: 8 Feb 2009, 8:51:26 UTC

EVGA Nvidia 9600 GT KO

256-bit (700MHz clock)
512MB GDDR3 Memory (950MHz clock - 1900MHz effective)
1773MHz Shader Clock
64 Stream Processors
60GB / second memory bandwidth

Seems to be pushing through a cuda unit in about just under 30 minutes.

Just curious what others results are?

Very dependent on the Angle Range of the WU's.

XFX GTX 295

Core Clock: 576 MHz
Shader Clock: 1242 MHz
Memory: 1792MB
Memory Bit Rate: 896 Bit
Memory Type: GDDR3
Memory Clock: 2000 MHz
Cores: 480

This can take anything from 4.25 minutes to 65 minutes (for VLAR's). The mid-range WU's take from 10 - 12 minutes.

F.
ID: 863442 · Report as offensive
Profile Westsail and *Pyxey*
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Jul 99
Posts: 338
Credit: 20,544,999
RAC: 0
United States
Message 863468 - Posted: 8 Feb 2009, 13:09:28 UTC

Tesla C1060
WU true angle range is : 0.447674
Flopcounter: 21078777591359.055000
624.1 seconds

WU true angle range is : 0.202486
Flopcounter: 28371208518161.293000
783.6 seconds

WU true angle range is : 0.447659
Flopcounter: 21078752137049.078000
651.8 seconds

WU true angle range is : 0.447909
Flopcounter: 21068672571808.508000
625.2 seconds

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, 'hmm... that's funny...'" -- Isaac Asimov
ID: 863468 · Report as offensive
malignantpoodle

Send message
Joined: 3 Feb 09
Posts: 205
Credit: 421,416
RAC: 0
United States
Message 863705 - Posted: 9 Feb 2009, 2:30:47 UTC

I have a 9800GT. Some tasks take 10 minutes, some take almost 2 hours.
ID: 863705 · Report as offensive
Profile popandbob
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Mar 05
Posts: 551
Credit: 4,673,015
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 863717 - Posted: 9 Feb 2009, 4:08:09 UTC

GTX 260 core 216 @ 700/1550/1100
14 credit = 3.5 min
mid range ar = 10 min



Do you Good Search for Seti@Home? http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=888957
Or Good Shop? http://www.goodshop.com/?charityid=888957
ID: 863717 · Report as offensive
Profile Westsail and *Pyxey*
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Jul 99
Posts: 338
Credit: 20,544,999
RAC: 0
United States
Message 863849 - Posted: 9 Feb 2009, 17:38:05 UTC - in response to Message 863705.  

I have a 9800GT. Some tasks take 10 minutes, some take almost 2 hours.

sheesh..those must be the VLARS. Could you take a look at this and scrape some data to plot if you want:
Cuda speeds
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, 'hmm... that's funny...'" -- Isaac Asimov
ID: 863849 · Report as offensive
Profile Sterling_Aug
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Sep 02
Posts: 54
Credit: 14,105,725
RAC: 0
United States
Message 875666 - Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 2:54:49 UTC

System: Dell Precision 690 Workstation
Dual quad core Xeon Processors 2.66 GHz each
4GB DDR RAM
Zotac GTX 295 video adapter

Core Clock: 688 MHz
Shader Clock: 1380 MHz
Memory: 1096 MHz
Memory: 1792 MB
Memory Bit Rate: 896 Bit
Memory Type: GDDR3
Cores: 480

I just installed the GTX 295 card today. I have only Enhanced 6.03 MB units running at this time. It will take some time to work through them unit I get CUDA work. I downloaded a number of AP work, but nothing has started running yet.

Each 6.03 task running on the CPU takes about 1:40:00 (one hour, 40 mins.) to complete.

Each 6.03 task running on the GPU take about 0:3:00 (3 minutes) to complete.

That is quite a difference. Now I can hardly wait to see how long the CUDA work units take after I get some.
ID: 875666 · Report as offensive
Profile Gundolf Jahn

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 00
Posts: 3184
Credit: 446,358
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 875731 - Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 9:22:31 UTC - in response to Message 875666.  

...
Each 6.03 task running on the GPU take about 0:3:00 (3 minutes) to complete.

I thought that 6.03 only runs on the CPU.

That is quite a difference. Now I can hardly wait to see how long the CUDA work units take after I get some.

If you have tasks running on the GPU, that are CUDA tasks (6.08).

Gruß,
Gundolf
Computer sind nicht alles im Leben. (Kleiner Scherz)

SETI@home classic workunits 3,758
SETI@home classic CPU time 66,520 hours
ID: 875731 · Report as offensive
Profile Byron S Goodgame
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 1145
Credit: 3,936,993
RAC: 0
United States
Message 875744 - Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 10:13:35 UTC - in response to Message 875731.  
Last modified: 15 Mar 2009, 10:19:53 UTC

...
Each 6.03 task running on the GPU take about 0:3:00 (3 minutes) to complete.

I thought that 6.03 only runs on the CPU.

That is quite a difference. Now I can hardly wait to see how long the CUDA work units take after I get some.

If you have tasks running on the GPU, that are CUDA tasks (6.08).

Gruß,
Gundolf

Seems a little odd he does have some strange looking tasks that by first glance look like CUDA tasks by the cpu time and credit over claim. this one being an example.

The stderr_txt seems to be missing alot of info as it is in other tasks of his. Some don't seem to have any info in them at all, but they're all showing up as 6.03

Edit: found this one of his CUDA and is 6.03

Loos like the CUDA team app clearing up some 6.03 he still had on the sys.
ID: 875744 · Report as offensive
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15184
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 3
Netherlands
Message 875757 - Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 12:35:56 UTC - in response to Message 875744.  

Edit: found this one of his CUDA and is 6.03

Loos like the CUDA team app clearing up some 6.03 he still had on the sys.

I was a bit baffled by that one as well, last night. But since it was crunched with the CUDA app, shouldn't his app version at the bottom show as 6.08?

I wonder what his app_info.xml looks like.
ID: 875757 · Report as offensive
Profile Byron S Goodgame
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 1145
Credit: 3,936,993
RAC: 0
United States
Message 875908 - Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 20:26:37 UTC - in response to Message 875757.  

Edit: found this one of his CUDA and is 6.03

with the CUDA app, shouldn't his app version at the bottom show as 6.08?

I wonder what his app_info.xml looks like.

The team app has a 6.03 tag for the transititon to CUDA in the app info file.
ID: 875908 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : Card model & Time to complete


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.