The Scientific Method; Academia

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : The Scientific Method; Academia
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 12273
Credit: 8,569,109
RAC: 79
United States
Message 760732 - Posted: 30 May 2008, 16:34:29 UTC

Over several months and several threads, questions have been raised about how we come to know, such as through the scientific method.
Separate from the method are the people that do or do not employ it. What is the life of a scientist like, some wonder. Or, perhaps some are wondering how trustworthy scientists are?

This thread should stick closely to these two topics: the scientific method and the scientists themselves.

I'll share my thoughts later. For now, I'd like those of you with questions to ask them. What precisely are your concerns with the scientific method, for example?

(BTW, I've noticed some of the people with questions or concerns about the scientific method are the same ones that have pointed out many times the issue of S@H WUs not being analyzed. Is there a contradiction here?)
Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.
ID: 760732 · Report as offensive
Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 12273
Credit: 8,569,109
RAC: 79
United States
Message 761037 - Posted: 31 May 2008, 1:39:00 UTC

The impetus for this thread are certain posts from the "Planet X Discovered" thread.

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=47070&nowrap=true#753171 (Taurus) and ... well, the other posts that you know were made. For example, some posts by my friend Knightmare. So, for example, Taurus and KM, I'd like to see that conversation continue here. Perhaps candorchasma might wish to join us in this conversation.

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.
ID: 761037 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 761384 - Posted: 31 May 2008, 17:28:07 UTC

Sarge,

Apparently I am missing something here --what's the issue.?
The scientific method proposes a hypothesis--based on trying to explain an observation of Nature or a conjecture based on the consequence of a theory.

Hopefully the hypothesis can be tested --proving it correct/incorrect by observation or inference from related, observed phenomena.

The hypothesis may have to be adjusted many times based on observational results.

I didn't catch the posts on following up on SETI work units--I have had those same wonderings. The BOINC -SETI folks should do a better job of reassuring everyone and posting the results of previous years' efforts. I would also like to see an explanation of how this fits in with other SETI efforts at Berkley and elsewhere.
ID: 761384 · Report as offensive
Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 12273
Credit: 8,569,109
RAC: 79
United States
Message 786799 - Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 5:52:46 UTC

Thread closed. Thanks.
Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.
ID: 786799 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : The Scientific Method; Academia


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.