Hilary Clinton ~ possible first female president of the US

Author	Message
BrainSmashR Send message Joined: 7 Apr 02 Posts: 1772 Credit: 384,573 RAC: 0	Message 659961 - Posted: 14 Oct 2007, 23:09:04 UTC - in response to Message 659860. I never claimed to be a prophet, just smarter than you, as has been pointed out by another user. The 'headlines' tell a different story... ;) When you grow up, you'll find out there's more to the paper than the Sunday Funnies. ID: 659961 ·

Jeffrey Send message Joined: 21 Nov 03 Posts: 4793 Credit: 26,029 RAC: 0	Message 659968 - Posted: 14 Oct 2007, 23:24:14 UTC - in response to Message 659961. When you grow up, you'll find out there's more to the paper than the Sunday Funnies. Who needs 'Sunday funnies' when we have so many 'Political jokers'... ;) It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . . ID: 659968 ·

KB7RZF Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 15 Aug 99 Posts: 9549 Credit: 3,308,926 RAC: 2	Message 659969 - Posted: 14 Oct 2007, 23:26:39 UTC - in response to Message 659968. When you grow up, you'll find out there's more to the paper than the Sunday Funnies. Who needs 'Sunday funnies' when we have so many 'Political jokers'... ;) When I grow up, I wanna be just as smart. And whats so wrong with the sunday funnies??? LOL I still read um. I dunno yet who I'm going to vote for. ID: 659969 ·

OzzFan Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28	Message 659976 - Posted: 14 Oct 2007, 23:38:05 UTC - in response to Message 659970. True Arnold cannot run for President, and much to his credit he doesn't think that rule should be changed. However, his term as governor ends at the same time as senator Barbara Boxer. I'm hoping when the time comes he runs for her seat in the senate. Will he then be the Senanator? ID: 659976 ·

Dr. C.E.T.I. Send message Joined: 29 Feb 00 Posts: 16019 Credit: 794,685 RAC: 0	Message 660077 - Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 16:51:14 UTC . . . look @ the Record . . . Action speaks LOUDER than Words - per se Fred Dalton Thompson (NA): Political Experience: ~ Senator, United States Senate, 1994-2002 ~ Elected to Senate in a Special Election, November 8, 1994 ~ Appellate Court Nominating Committee, TN, 1985-1987 ~ Special Counsel to the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee, 1982 ~ Special Counsel to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 1980-1981 ~ Special Counsel to Tennessee Governor Lamar Alexander, 1980 ~ Chief Republican Counsel (Minority Counsel),US Senate Watergate Committee, 1973-1974 ~ Assistant US Attorney, Middle Tennessee, 1969-1972 ~ Campaign Manager, Howard Baker ~ Staff Attorney to Senator Howard Baker. Organizations: Caucuses/Non-Legislative Committees: ~ US Senate Foreign Relations and Intelligence Committees, Special Counsel ~ Senate Watergate Committee ~ Minority Counsel. Fred Dalton Thompson is currently being tested through the 2008 Political Courage Test . . . BOINC Wiki . . . Science Status Page . . . ID: 660077 ·

kittyman Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51469 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004	Message 660452 - Posted: 16 Oct 2007, 8:11:22 UTC How about this record........ Subject: History >> >> Subject: History Lesson >> A little history lesson. If you don't know the answer make >> your >> best >> guess. Answer all the questions before looking at the >> answers. >> >> Who said it? >> >> 1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the >> common >> good." >> >> A. Karl Marx >> B. Adolph Hitler >> C. Joseph Stalin >> D. None of the above >> >> 2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government >> of >> the >> few, by the few, and for the few...... And t o replace >> it >> with shared >> responsibility for shared prosperity." >> >> A. Lenin >> B. Mussolini >> C. Idi Amin >> D. None of the Above >> >> 3) "(We) ...can't just let business as usual go on, and that >> means >> something has to be taken away from some people." >> >> A. Nikita Khrushev >> B. Josef Goebbels >> C. Boris Yeltsin >> D. None of the above >> >> 4) "We have to build a political consensus and that requires >> people >> to give up a little bit of their own ... in order to >> create this common ground." >> >> A. Mao Tse Dung >> B. Hugo Chavez >> C. Kim Jong Il >> D. None of the above >> >> 5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed." >> >> A. Karl Marx >> B. Lenin >> C. Molotov >> D. None of the above >> >> 6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has >> become the >> most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they >> are being >> watched." >> >> A. Pinochet >> B. Milosevic >> C. Saddam Hussein >> D. None of the above >> >> >> Scroll down for answers >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Answers >> >> (1) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary >> Clinton 6/29/2004 >> >> (2) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary >> Clinton 5/29/2007 >> >> (3) D. N one of the above. Statement was made by Hillary >> Clinton 6/4/2007 >> >> (4) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary >> Clinton 6/4/2007 >> >> (5) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary >> Clinton 6/4/2007 >> >> (6) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary >> Clinton 9/2/2005 >> >> Be afraid, Be very afraid "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster ID: 660452 ·

William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4	Message 660473 - Posted: 16 Oct 2007, 9:04:23 UTC Last modified: 16 Oct 2007, 9:08:38 UTC I added a Daddio Comic here but judged it to be too mean spirited-even if only poking fun. It will be an interesting Election Season ID: 660473 ·

Darth Dogbytes™ Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 30 Jul 03 Posts: 7512 Credit: 2,021,148 RAC: 0	Message 660494 - Posted: 16 Oct 2007, 10:42:17 UTC Last modified: 16 Oct 2007, 10:49:59 UTC ...boy, oh boy, ya gotta love sound bites taken out of context. With George W. Bush you can use whole paragraphs...but that's another topic. Fairly soon, the politicos are going to start bombarding us with TV sound bites with a combined war chest of over $3 billion. The funny thing is, that in a recent CNN poll, 91% of respondants said that these political commericals don't make them vote any differently. What a circus... :D To be fair, I'm not a fan of Hilary's and I think that we are getting her shoved down our throats, along with the rest of the Beltway cliques from both parties. Wake up America...! Account frozen... ID: 660494 ·

Es99 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0	Message 660514 - Posted: 16 Oct 2007, 11:43:00 UTC - in response to Message 660452. How about this record........ Subject: History >> >> Subject: History Lesson >> A little history lesson. If you don't know the answer make >> your >> best >> guess. Answer all the questions before looking at the >> answers. >> >> Who said it? >> >> 1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the >> common >> good." >> >> A. Karl Marx >> B. Adolph Hitler >> C. Joseph Stalin >> D. None of the above >> >> 2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government >> of >> the >> few, by the few, and for the few...... And t o replace >> it >> with shared >> responsibility for shared prosperity." >> >> A. Lenin >> B. Mussolini >> C. Idi Amin >> D. None of the Above >> >> 3) "(We) ...can't just let business as usual go on, and that >> means >> something has to be taken away from some people." >> >> A. Nikita Khrushev >> B. Josef Goebbels >> C. Boris Yeltsin >> D. None of the above >> >> 4) "We have to build a political consensus and that requires >> people >> to give up a little bit of their own ... in order to >> create this common ground." >> >> A. Mao Tse Dung >> B. Hugo Chavez >> C. Kim Jong Il >> D. None of the above >> >> 5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed." >> >> A. Karl Marx >> B. Lenin >> C. Molotov >> D. None of the above >> >> 6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has >> become the >> most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they >> are being >> watched." >> >> A. Pinochet >> B. Milosevic >> C. Saddam Hussein >> D. None of the above >> >> >> Scroll down for answers >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Answers >> >> (1) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary >> Clinton 6/29/2004 >> >> (2) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary >> Clinton 5/29/2007 >> >> (3) D. N one of the above. Statement was made by Hillary >> Clinton 6/4/2007 >> >> (4) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary >> Clinton 6/4/2007 >> >> (5) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary >> Clinton 6/4/2007 >> >> (6) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary >> Clinton 9/2/2005 >> >> Be afraid, Be very afraid Wow..I like her more and more. Go Hilary!!! Reality Internet Personality ID: 660514 ·

Helsionium Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 24 Dec 06 Posts: 156 Credit: 86,214,817 RAC: 43	Message 660525 - Posted: 16 Oct 2007, 12:32:59 UTC Hmmm... I don't see anything wrong about these statements, either... ID: 660525 ·

BrainSmashR Send message Joined: 7 Apr 02 Posts: 1772 Credit: 384,573 RAC: 0	Message 660528 - Posted: 16 Oct 2007, 12:51:15 UTC Last modified: 16 Oct 2007, 12:53:15 UTC "(We) ...can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people." "I certainly think the free-market has failed." "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched." If our free market economy has failed, then how is there a "most profitable sector"? Seems to me our free market economy has been wildly successful for those willing to take a chance instead of sitting on their butt waiting for the government to take care of them....and if she didn't see it, she wouldn't think we needed to take (steal from the successful) something from them... Universal health care indeed.... ID: 660528 ·

Jeffrey Send message Joined: 21 Nov 03 Posts: 4793 Credit: 26,029 RAC: 0	Message 660567 - Posted: 16 Oct 2007, 14:42:30 UTC - in response to Message 660528. (steal from the successful) As if they didn't steal from everybody else... ;) It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . . ID: 660567 ·

Beethoven Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Jun 06 Posts: 15274 Credit: 8,546 RAC: 0	Message 660584 - Posted: 16 Oct 2007, 15:10:51 UTC - in response to Message 659968. Last modified: 16 Oct 2007, 15:12:56 UTC When you grow up, you'll find out there's more to the paper than the Sunday Funnies. Who needs 'Sunday funnies' when we have so many 'Political jokers'... ;) Is it raining? Should I take umbrage? Seriously though, as a most minor member of Team Hillary, I can tell you her campaign to win the nomination is looking good. In two respects especially: the cash keeps rolling in, and it's amazing to me how many women are getting behind her. Love her or leave her, she's got some serious support. ;] ID: 660584 ·

Beethoven Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Jun 06 Posts: 15274 Credit: 8,546 RAC: 0	Message 660591 - Posted: 16 Oct 2007, 15:18:38 UTC - in response to Message 658971. Last modified: 16 Oct 2007, 15:19:44 UTC You mean other than being a Dumbocrat, remaining married to an adulterer and only the 3rd man in US history to face impeachment and trying to push a health care plan that will be paid for by the working man and utilized by those without real jobs? En Garde! Apart from the scandal, President Bill Clinton did a great deal of good for the United States, its citizens, the reputation of America in the world, and... he didn't screw up his intervention in Serbia-Croatia the way President Bush is screwing up in Iraq. Your objections to Bill Clinton are petty. ID: 660591 ·

John Clark Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 29 Sep 99 Posts: 16515 Credit: 4,418,829 RAC: 0	Message 660594 - Posted: 16 Oct 2007, 15:22:04 UTC - in response to Message 660591. You mean other than being a Dumbocrat, remaining married to an adulterer and only the 3rd man in US history to face impeachment and trying to push a health care plan that will be paid for by the working man and utilized by those without real jobs? En Garde! Apart from the scandal, President Bill Clinton did a great deal of good for the United States, its citizens, the reputation of America in the world, and... he didn't screw up his intervention in Serbia-Croatia the way President Bush is screwing up in Iraq. Your objections to Bill Clinton are petty. As an outsider looking in, I support these comments. The world reputation of the US, under Clinton, was good. Since Bush Junior got in it gone very far south. It's good to be back amongst friends and colleagues ID: 660594 ·

bobby Send message Joined: 22 Mar 02 Posts: 2866 Credit: 17,789,109 RAC: 3	Message 660696 - Posted: 16 Oct 2007, 22:08:29 UTC - in response to Message 660680. Last modified: 16 Oct 2007, 22:09:13 UTC Love her or leave her, she's got some serious support. ;] A) Can I leave her please..... B) Will she wear it? Was listening to today's Simon Mayo BBC Radio 5Live podcast earlier, he interviewed Dr Frank Luntz (former pollster for the Republican Party) who seemed to think a Clinton presidency very likely. This piece in last week's Economist ends: All told, she looks likely to translate this into both the Democratic nomination and a victory in November 2008. But whether a Clinton restoration will be good for America is a much more difficult question. Seems some on the right have already given up on a Republican winning the White House in 2008. Personally I think, provided she doesn't make a hash of things a la Howard Dean, the nomination is hers. The White House I'm not so sure about. I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... ID: 660696 ·

BrainSmashR Send message Joined: 7 Apr 02 Posts: 1772 Credit: 384,573 RAC: 0	Message 660922 - Posted: 17 Oct 2007, 1:56:09 UTC - in response to Message 660567. Last modified: 17 Oct 2007, 1:57:53 UTC (steal from the successful) As if they didn't steal from everybody else... ;) typical excuse of the poverty stricken....you got a job yet or are you still stealing from the taxpayers? ID: 660922 ·

BrainSmashR Send message Joined: 7 Apr 02 Posts: 1772 Credit: 384,573 RAC: 0	Message 660932 - Posted: 17 Oct 2007, 2:08:17 UTC Yeah, the world smiles when Clinton ignored embassy and battleship bombings, Bush takes the war to their homeland and the world frowns....like we care ID: 660932 ·

bobby Send message Joined: 22 Mar 02 Posts: 2866 Credit: 17,789,109 RAC: 3	Message 661014 - Posted: 17 Oct 2007, 3:59:16 UTC - in response to Message 660932. Yeah, the world smiles when Clinton ignored embassy and battleship bombings, Bush takes the war to their homeland and the world frowns....like we care Ignored by sending cruise missiles into Afghanistan and Sudan? Of course they missed their targets, but then they were sent to destinations picked by the never inaccurate US intelligence services, you know the ones that said that Hussein had acquired masses of WMD (where are they again?). I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... ID: 661014 ·

Rush Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 3131 Credit: 302,569 RAC: 0	Message 661156 - Posted: 17 Oct 2007, 8:11:32 UTC - in response to Message 661014. Of course they missed their targets, but then they were sent to destinations picked by the never inaccurate US intelligence services, you know the ones that said that Hussein had acquired masses of WMD (where are they again?). Do you know what editorializing is, Bobby? Haven't you seen the quotes from the Russians, the Tchermanns, the French, and swarms of them from the Democrats as well? All of the intelligence agencies, Western and otherwise believed that. Many of them believed that what wasn't found was destroyed. Mostly because not only did he have the stuff, he USED THE STUFF, against Halabja and Iran among others. How about these: And: The intelligence agencies said he had these too. Of course, he said he didn't, he said he destroyed them as well. Is this an oops? Which would you have destroyed, the relatively easily replaceable chemicals? Or would you just have gone ahead and destroyed the utterly irreplaceable MiGs? Sand Trap. Cordially, Rush elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com Remove the obvious... ID: 661156 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.