Which method is better for merging traffic?
Message boards :
Cafe SETI :
Which method is better for merging traffic?
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 RichaG  Send message Joined: 20 May 99 Posts: 1690 Credit: 19,287,294 RAC: 36 
 |
Method 1: Both lanes stay full and at the merging point the cars alternate back and forth like a zipper coming together. Method 2: The way it's mostly done in the US now. Cars merge over to one lane long before the other lane closes. Which allows some cars to drive quickly to the merging point and sneak ahead of many cars. If traffic is flowing quickly then I vote for method 2, but when traffic slows down to less than 30 MPH I vote for method 1. Red Bull Air Racing Gas price by zip at Seti 
ID: 162394 ·  |
Kajunfisher  Send message Joined: 29 Mar 05 Posts: 1407 Credit: 126,476 RAC: 0
|
Method 3: Close both eyes, floor it, swerve & try not to spill beer... ID: 162461 · |
Saenger  Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2452 Credit: 33,281 RAC: 0 
|
If traffic is flowing quickly then I vote for method 2, but when traffic slows down to less than 30 MPH I vote for method 1. I agree, afaik it's official mandatory in germany to use #1 in case of slow traffic, but but many peoply try to get over way before, and waste a lot of street space. Gruesse vom Saenger For questions about Boinc look in the BOINC-Wiki ID: 162466 · |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.