Americans bomb far-away place

Author	Message
N/A Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 18 May 01 Posts: 3718 Credit: 93,649 RAC: 0	Message 132375 - Posted: 4 Jul 2005, 6:26:40 UTC [font='courier,courier new']Dear NASA Chairperson,      $330M and I couldn't see the damn thing in the sky.      Do it again.      Another 5 sticks of TNT should only cost about another $0.001M... Sincerelessly, - Tom N. Chique[/font] ID: 132375 ·

mlcudd Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 11 Apr 03 Posts: 782 Credit: 63,647 RAC: 0	Message 132420 - Posted: 4 Jul 2005, 10:45:33 UTC - in response to Message 132375. [font='courier,courier new']Dear NASA Chairperson, Â Â Â Â Â $330M and I couldn't see the damn thing in the sky. Â Â Â Â Â Do it again. Â Â Â Â Â Another 5 sticks of TNT should only cost about another $0.001M... Sincerelessly, - Tom N. Chique[/font] * I really think they should have had a "Neutron" payload maybe that would have rattled the thing apart. We probably could have seen a Nuclear blast, but with the water content of that thing, we would have had a "Space Lake" haha www.boincsynergy.com ID: 132420 ·

Daniel Michel Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 2 Feb 04 Posts: 14925 Credit: 1,378,607 RAC: 6	Message 132422 - Posted: 4 Jul 2005, 10:53:32 UTC - in response to Message 132420. Last modified: 4 Jul 2005, 10:56:14 UTC [font='courier,courier new']Dear NASA Chairperson, $330M and I couldn't see the damn thing in the sky. Do it again. Another 5 sticks of TNT should only cost about another $0.001M... Sincerelessly, - Tom N. Chique[/font] * I really think they should have had a "Neutron" payload maybe that would have rattled the thing apart. We probably could have seen a Nuclear blast, but with the water content of that thing, we would have had a "Space Lake" haha i was kind of hoping that it turned out that this particular comet was made of some kind of combustive and explosive material...as it is...they only managed to change the comets course...it's now headed on a collision course with EARTH! PROUD TO BE TFFE! ID: 132422 ·

mlcudd Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 11 Apr 03 Posts: 782 Credit: 63,647 RAC: 0	Message 132423 - Posted: 4 Jul 2005, 10:58:40 UTC - in response to Message 132422. * I really think they should have had a "Neutron" payload maybe that would have rattled the thing apart. We probably could have seen a Nuclear blast, but with the water content of that thing, we would have had a "Space Lake" haha [/quote] i was kind of hoping that it turned out that this particular comet was made of some kind of combustive and explosive material...as it is...they only managed to change the comets course...it's now headed on a collision course with EARTH![/quote] If that is the case..then maybe we should consider the "Space Lake".. That would be a hell of a "Rain Storm" huh. When will it hit earth.....a few hundred years? Just curious www.boincsynergy.com ID: 132423 ·

Fuzzy Hollynoodles Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 9659 Credit: 251,998 RAC: 0	Message 132427 - Posted: 4 Jul 2005, 11:58:42 UTC - in response to Message 132375. Last modified: 4 Jul 2005, 12:40:28 UTC [font='courier,courier new']Dear NASA Chairperson, $330M and I couldn't see the damn thing in the sky. Do it again. Another 5 sticks of TNT should only cost about another $0.001M... Sincerelessly, - Tom N. Chique Dear Mr. Chique, I'd have said, why not looking for oil, why you're there? And yes, if there were no oil there, you should've bombed the place to smithereens! Like my colleagues at your place say: "Damn no good place!" Sheik Y'Bouty [/font] "I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me ID: 132427 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.