Why can't we continue with good old setiathome?

Questions and Answers : Web site : Why can't we continue with good old setiathome?
Message board moderation

Author	Message
iSage Send message Joined: 22 Jun 01 Posts: 1 Credit: 992 RAC: 0	Message 123854 - Posted: 15 Jun 2005, 11:01:30 UTC If boinc is the future of seti, with no stats, lost work unit credits, bad connections, etc... I feel sorry for all those who put in many years of work to make seti the number 1 in distributed computing. IMHO - boinc is not a step forward. I will end up throwing away 4 years and 13 897 WUs in frustration. ID: 123854 ·
Bill Barto Send message Joined: 28 Jun 99 Posts: 864 Credit: 58,712,313 RAC: 91	Message 123907 - Posted: 15 Jun 2005, 15:16:43 UTC I have not lost any credits, there are plenty of stats available (more than SETI Classic), and bad connections abounded in SETI Classic at the beginning. Take some time to read up on SETI BOINC, there is plenty of information available. ID: 123907 ·
Pascal, K G Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2343 Credit: 150,491 RAC: 0	Message 123946 - Posted: 15 Jun 2005, 19:48:45 UTC Yeah I agree Classic is really bad.... Semper Eadem So long Paul, it has been a hell of a ride. Park your ego's, fire up the computers, Science YES, Credits No. ID: 123946 ·
Ananas Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 14 Dec 01 Posts: 195 Credit: 2,503,252 RAC: 0	Message 124006 - Posted: 15 Jun 2005, 21:58:43 UTC - in response to Message 123946.   Yeah I agree Classic is really bad.... You didn't even blush when you wrote that - I see "Joined 1999" for you so you must like "really bad" stuff a lot. ID: 124006 ·

 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.