Classic was better !

Author	Message
Terry & Brunny Schnae Send message Joined: 29 Aug 04 Posts: 2 Credit: 0 RAC: 0	Message 122868 - Posted: 13 Jun 2005, 2:32:34 UTC Learn a lesson from Coke - - - give it back ID: 122868 ·

Bill Barto Send message Joined: 28 Jun 99 Posts: 864 Credit: 58,712,313 RAC: 91	Message 122906 - Posted: 13 Jun 2005, 4:13:33 UTC Classic better? Not if you weren't around in the beginning. Classic was much the same when it first started. ID: 122906 ·

Saenger Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2452 Credit: 33,281 RAC: 0	Message 122909 - Posted: 13 Jun 2005, 4:22:06 UTC Last modified: 13 Jun 2005, 4:23:20 UTC What's the 'better' part you're missing? The need for add-ons? The impossibility to run more than one project at the same time? The substandard (from a scientific POV) handling of results, that made it easy for cheaters? Or is it simply the lack of problems, that never ever happened in those good old days (beware of the sarcasm tags;)? It's the difficult transition period, long awaited and finaly happening, that makes the handling of the servers even more difficult for the understaffed project team. Remember: They have to maintain 2 projects ATM with the manpower for !. Once Classic is finally gone, it will smoothen. Gruesse vom Saenger For questions about Boinc look in the BOINC-Wiki ID: 122909 ·

Pascal, K G Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2343 Credit: 150,491 RAC: 0	Message 122929 - Posted: 13 Jun 2005, 5:23:27 UTC No, Classic coke sucked Semper Eadem So long Paul, it has been a hell of a ride. Park your ego's, fire up the computers, Science YES, Credits No. ID: 122929 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.