Message boards :
Number crunching :
Scheduler Responding
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Bill Barto Send message Joined: 28 Jun 99 Posts: 864 Credit: 58,712,313 RAC: 91 |
The scheduler is responding now. I just got some new workunits. There will be a backlog for awhile as everyone fills up their cache. Still no word on what the problem was. |
Bruno G. Olsen & ESEA @ greenholt Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 875 Credit: 4,386,984 RAC: 0 |
|
Chilean Send message Joined: 6 Apr 03 Posts: 498 Credit: 3,200,504 RAC: 0 |
|
RichaG Send message Joined: 20 May 99 Posts: 1690 Credit: 19,287,294 RAC: 36 |
The congestion was probably due to the automatic downloading of the 4.09 seti application program to all of the current users. There was a similar congestion when they upgraded to 4.10. To bad it didn't fix the problem. Red Bull Air Racing Gas price by zip at Seti |
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
Hmmm, seems to work now. Upload worked 4/4/2005 9:19:52 PM|SETI@home|Started upload of 02ja05aa.4529.2288.390916.41_0_0 4/4/2005 9:20:29 PM|SETI@home|Finished upload of 02ja05aa.4529.2288.390916.41_0_0 4/4/2005 9:20:29 PM|SETI@home|Throughput 1050 bytes/sec Reporting/updating worked. 4/4/2005 10:26:50 PM|SETI@home|Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 4/4/2005 10:26:56 PM|SETI@home|Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 4/4/2005 10:26:56 PM|SETI@home|Host location: home 4/4/2005 10:26:56 PM|SETI@home|Using your default project prefs didn't request a D/L though, so I can't say anything about that. Still have 5 WU waiting |
MJKelleher Send message Joined: 1 Jul 99 Posts: 2048 Credit: 1,575,401 RAC: 0 |
> Hmmm, seems to work now. > > Upload worked > ..... > Reporting/updating worked. > .... > didn't request a D/L though, so I can't say anything about that. Still have 5 > WU waiting > I've been able to download a couple of work units, though they took several attempts to complete. It's getting there... |
Bruno G. Olsen & ESEA @ greenholt Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 875 Credit: 4,386,984 RAC: 0 |
|
Spectrum Send message Joined: 14 Jun 99 Posts: 468 Credit: 53,129,336 RAC: 0 |
> The congestion was probably due to the automatic downloading of the 4.09 seti > application program to all of the current users. > There was a similar congestion when they upgraded to 4.10. > To bad it didn't fix the problem. > To tell the truth I didn't really notice any problems with uploads or downloads of work units when 4.10 came in and I had few 4.09 units after the switch back go through before the scheduler stopped responding and that was quite pronounced as I looked at it from about 8.00pm 04.04.05 Perth WA time UTC+8 hrs (even though they say +7hrs, daylight savings?) and again at 4.30am 05.04.05 my time and the schedulers still were not responding, who knows what happened apart from what you can see on boincstats about scheduler status as Berkely haven't posted anything about congsetion on the front page apart from that it was going back to 4.09? but it was the weekend so hey I don't like to say it but Einstien was having fun!! |
Sir Ulli Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0 |
at this time time i get this 05.04.2005 23:18:14|SETI@home|Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 05.04.2005 23:18:14|SETI@home|Message from server: Not sending work - last RPC too recent: 3 sec 05.04.2005 23:18:14|SETI@home|No work from project 05.04.2005 23:18:14|SETI@home|Deferring communication with project for 10 minutes and 0 seconds Greetings from Germany NRW Ulli S@h Berkeley's Staff Friends Club m7 © |
Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 19 Jul 00 Posts: 3898 Credit: 1,158,042 RAC: 0 |
> at this time time i get this > > 05.04.2005 23:18:14|SETI@home|Scheduler RPC to > http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded > 05.04.2005 23:18:14|SETI@home|Message from server: Not sending work - last RPC > too recent: 3 sec > 05.04.2005 23:18:14|SETI@home|No work from project > 05.04.2005 23:18:14|SETI@home|Deferring communication with project for 10 > minutes and 0 seconds > The scheduler is denying you a connection because it thinks you are asking again too soon. This is most common when you first attach to a project or when the server is under load ... |
Archon Send message Joined: 31 Aug 01 Posts: 90 Credit: 400,599 RAC: 0 |
Is all well with people's connetion's??? I keep geting master file fetch failure, and no I haven't changed any firewall settings, it was working about 6 hours ago and just stopped?? Cheers Gav Nothing is 'fool-proof', someone will always invent a better fool! |
Aurora Borealis Send message Joined: 14 Jan 01 Posts: 3075 Credit: 5,631,463 RAC: 0 |
I uploaded results about 12 hr ago. Boinc has been trying since then to download some new WU. Getting nothing but Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi failed No schedulers responded messages. No big deal, I got plenty of other projects to keep the CPU busy. I just find it strange, since I don't see problems posted on the home or status pages. Can someone tell me, is the server down? Boinc V7.2.42 Win7 i5 3.33G 4GB, GTX470 |
Archon Send message Joined: 31 Aug 01 Posts: 90 Credit: 400,599 RAC: 0 |
Yeah not a big deal as I have enough in my cache to keep going, would be nice if we could find out if it was a server/netwok fault as I keep thinking its mine! Cheers Gav Nothing is 'fool-proof', someone will always invent a better fool! |
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
> I uploaded results about 12 hr ago. Boinc has been trying since then to > download some new WU. Getting nothing but > Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi failed > No schedulers responded > messages. > No big deal, I got plenty of other projects to keep the CPU busy. I just find > it strange, since I don't see problems posted on the home or status pages. Can > someone tell me, is the server down? > I did a "Project Update" and go this: 4/7/2005 12:31:08 AM|SETI@home|Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 4/7/2005 12:31:11 AM|SETI@home|Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded I did it again just now and got: 4/7/2005 1:13:03 AM|SETI@home|Sending request to scheduler: http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 4/7/2005 1:13:05 AM|SETI@home|Scheduler RPC to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded I don't have any finished work to send or report, but I connected. Master fetch failed usually means I'm not connected to the internet. hope this helps tony |
Aurora Borealis Send message Joined: 14 Jan 01 Posts: 3075 Credit: 5,631,463 RAC: 0 |
UPDATE... Boinc just made a connection with Seti and D/L a single WU. I usually get 2 or 3. edit... I just checked it In 7 min its already done 25%. Normal WU usually take 4 to 6 hr. I guess this one won't last long. Boinc V7.2.42 Win7 i5 3.33G 4GB, GTX470 |
1mp0£173 Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0 |
> Boinc just made a connection with Seti and D/L a single WU. I usually get 2 or > 3. Well, I've got one running and one ready, which is normal for my settings. As an experiment the other day, I changed "connect every 'x' days" to 3 and got a bunch of work, then set it back to .25 and now it's caught up. I crunch other projects so I don't need a big cache to stay busy. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.