Message boards :
Number crunching :
Date *Seti@Home member since* wrong since update
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Honie Send message Joined: 22 Jan 04 Posts: 141 Credit: 29,681,066 RAC: 0 |
Not very important, but the SETI@home member since (date) on "Your Acoount" page is wrong. I'm here since 01/20/04 but the date is 04/03/99. Anyone else see this? |
Iztok s52d (and friends) Send message Joined: 12 Jan 01 Posts: 136 Credit: 393,469,375 RAC: 116 |
> Not very important, but the > > SETI@home member since (date) > > on "Your Acoount" page is wrong. > > I'm here since 01/20/04 but the date is 04/03/99. > > Anyone else see this? > > > Hi! Probaly some "feature" of last updating. Everyone is now set as April 3rd,1999. It happened few hours ago. BR Iztok |
Bruno G. Olsen & ESEA @ greenholt Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 875 Credit: 4,386,984 RAC: 0 |
|
Saenger Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2452 Credit: 33,281 RAC: 0 |
What happened on Apr 3, 1999? Massive UFO sightings? Distributed DoS attac on Classic? As all of you started then, you may inform us just-Boincers of these extraordinary events in the beginning of Seti ;) ;) Edit: Just saw some very disturbing thing on the left: I started with classic as well without my knowledge. Someone has to have stolen my data! :evil grin: Gruesse vom Saenger For questions about Boinc look in the BOINC-Wiki |
FalconFly Send message Joined: 5 Oct 99 Posts: 394 Credit: 18,053,892 RAC: 0 |
Same here, actual Data is : Registered on: Tue Oct 5 23:08:22 1999 UTC Got shifted a few months into the Past (3 Apr 1999) as well ;) |
Keck_Komputers Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 1575 Credit: 4,152,111 RAC: 1 |
Looks like everyone got that. Look at the tags by the nick/avatars. BOINC WIKI BOINCing since 2002/12/8 |
Bill Barto Send message Joined: 28 Jun 99 Posts: 864 Credit: 58,712,313 RAC: 91 |
The Member Since date is now correct. It is no longer off by two or three days for the older classic members. |
RB Send message Joined: 7 Mar 00 Posts: 103 Credit: 1,084,436 RAC: 0 |
> The Member Since date is now correct. Hmmmm....Mine still says April 3, 1999. Strange... ???? |
Bill Barto Send message Joined: 28 Jun 99 Posts: 864 Credit: 58,712,313 RAC: 91 |
> > The Member Since date is now correct. > > > Hmmmm....Mine still says April 3, 1999. > > Strange... > > > > ???? > > > > > > Very strange. I just noticed that "Saenger's" date still says April 3, 1999 also. When did you actually join? |
RB Send message Joined: 7 Mar 00 Posts: 103 Credit: 1,084,436 RAC: 0 |
> Very strange. I just noticed that "Saenger's" date still says April 3, 1999 > also. > > When did you actually join? > > If you quickly look at my BOINC STATS box in my classic .sig (before the stats site possible updates it to the incorrect BOINC info), you can see that the correct date is March 07, 2000, UTC, which was March 06,2000 in my time zone (Canada Eastern Time). Oh well, doesn't really matter. |
Saenger Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2452 Credit: 33,281 RAC: 0 |
> Very strange. I just noticed that "Saenger's" date still says April 3, 1999 > also. > When did you actually join? 26 Oct 2004 19:04:12 That's what Neil Munday says in my sig, and as it was around that time, I believe he's right ;) I never crunched Classic, and I have the impression, that the Classic crunchers got their date back, while we just-boincers still stuck the impressive vintage date. I think we can all brag now with being there first, in the good old pre-alpha days, when the CLI was still a CLI, and GUI something to dream of (in nightmares with a huge ugly blue box on the left ;) I'll write my date down now nevertheless, before Neil updates the XML and also states this ancient date. Gruesse vom Saenger For questions about Boinc look in the BOINC-Wiki |
CLARDS Send message Joined: 7 Jul 04 Posts: 27 Credit: 5,437,941 RAC: 14 |
My classic stats are incorrect also. I figure it wil all come out in the wash. No worries here. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.