Message boards :
Number crunching :
Odd result...
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Daykay Send message Joined: 18 Dec 00 Posts: 647 Credit: 739,559 RAC: 0 |
Apparently (according to BOINCLog X) I have completed one WU (29dc04aa.15831.5458.311076.169_1_0) in a total time of 3 mins 54 sec. and with an err_txt: SETI@Home Informational message -9 result_overflow NOTE: The number of results detected exceeds the storage space allocated. Anyone know what this is all about? Kolch - Crunching for the BOINC@Australia team since July 2004. Search for your own intelligence... |
KWSN - MajorKong Send message Joined: 5 Jan 00 Posts: 2892 Credit: 1,499,890 RAC: 0 |
> Apparently (according to BOINCLog X) I have completed one WU > (29dc04aa.15831.5458.311076.169_1_0) in a total time of 3 mins 54 sec. and > with an err_txt: SETI@Home Informational message -9 result_overflow NOTE: The > number of results detected exceeds the storage space allocated. > > Anyone know what this is all about? > > It found way too many spikes, etc. in that work unit, so the client quit early. Most likely it was either full of RFI (radio frequency interference) or was a test unit. The client exits early when the file of data to return to berkeley grows beyond a certain size. https://youtu.be/iY57ErBkFFE #Texit Don't blame me, I voted for Johnson(L) in 2016. Truth is dangerous... especially when it challenges those in power. |
Daykay Send message Joined: 18 Dec 00 Posts: 647 Credit: 739,559 RAC: 0 |
> It found way too many spikes, etc. in that work unit, so the client quit > early. Most likely it was either full of RFI (radio frequency interference) > or was a test unit. Most likely full of RFI? Well how will we know since it wasn't analysed? Kolch - Crunching for the BOINC@Australia team since July 2004. Search for your own intelligence... |
1mp0£173 Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0 |
> > It found way too many spikes, etc. in that work unit, so the client quit > > early. Most likely it was either full of RFI (radio frequency > interference) > > or was a test unit. > > Most likely full of RFI? Well how will we know since it wasn't analysed? .... because there is so much RFI that the chance of pulling a signal out of the noise is extremely low. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.