Message boards :
Number crunching :
WU already in list since 9 Dec 2004
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Dugonin Send message Joined: 26 Nov 04 Posts: 8 Credit: 20,932,901 RAC: 0 |
Why this wokunit is already in my list since Dec 2004 ? http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=522057 My hostid = 397363 |
Saenger Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2452 Credit: 33,281 RAC: 0 |
> Why this wokunit is already in my list since Dec 2004 ? > > http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=522057 > > My hostid = 397363 You've got a client error while downloading: 21105137 397363 6 Dec 2004 6:28:04 UTC 6 Dec 2004 6:29:11 UTC Over Client error Downloading 0.00 0.00 --- What I do not know is, why you got this WU in the first place, since it was already crunched 3 times in july. Gruesse vom Saenger For questions about Boinc look in the BOINC-Wiki |
PlaNed Send message Joined: 19 Jul 01 Posts: 28 Credit: 321,251 RAC: 0 |
I have a same "problem": 7008107 1782911 8 Sep 2004 7:32:42 UTC 9 Sep 2004 12:29:04 UTC Over Success Done 13,710.73 45.19 pending |
Ingleside Send message Joined: 4 Feb 03 Posts: 1546 Credit: 15,832,022 RAC: 13 |
> Why this wokunit is already in my list since Dec 2004 ? > > http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=522057 > > My hostid = 397363 > > Before December, any wu that didn't pass validation due to the results wasn't "similar enough", wasn't sent out again as it should. After this bug was fixed, a fix-script was run on the database re-starting all wu with 3 "success" but no consensus. Looking on the date, this wu is one of these, but since all 5 re-issues got a download-error most likely the actual wu-file had been corrupted/missing from download-directory in one of the many server-crashes. Anyway, the wu should have been purged by now since errored-out, but it looks like the db_purger isn't removing errored-out wu any longer, or it's not removing any wu there some results is still showing "pending"... |
Dugonin Send message Joined: 26 Nov 04 Posts: 8 Credit: 20,932,901 RAC: 0 |
> > Why this wokunit is already in my list since Dec 2004 ? > > > > http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=522057 > > > > My hostid = 397363 > > > > > > Before December, any wu that didn't pass validation due to the results wasn't > "similar enough", wasn't sent out again as it should. After this bug was > fixed, a fix-script was run on the database re-starting all wu with 3 > "success" but no consensus. Looking on the date, this wu is one of these, but > since all 5 re-issues got a download-error most likely the actual wu-file had > been corrupted/missing from download-directory in one of the many > server-crashes. > > Anyway, the wu should have been purged by now since errored-out, but it looks > like the db_purger isn't removing errored-out wu any longer, or it's not > removing any wu there some results is still showing "pending"... Thanks for your explanations. I dont know from where this WU has been purged but it is already in my list of WU: http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=397363&offset=380 and I think that it is because of this problem, that I have so many WU in this list (384). |
Ingleside Send message Joined: 4 Feb 03 Posts: 1546 Credit: 15,832,022 RAC: 13 |
> Thanks for your explanations. I dont know from where this WU has been purged > but it is already in my list of WU: > The db_purger saves to file and afterwards deletes "done" wu from the database, since it's still showing up in your list of wu it means it haven't been purged yet. ;) > > and I think that it is because of this problem, that I have so many WU in this > list (384). > The db_purger normally deletes wu 7 days after was validated and all results reported or passed deadline, but due to the database currently overworked everything goes slower than normal. |
Dugonin Send message Joined: 26 Nov 04 Posts: 8 Credit: 20,932,901 RAC: 0 |
> > Thanks for your explanations. I dont know from where this WU has been > purged > > but it is already in my list of WU: > > > > The db_purger saves to file and afterwards deletes "done" wu from the > database, since it's still showing up in your list of wu it means it haven't > been purged yet. ;) > > > > > and I think that it is because of this problem, that I have so many WU in > this > > list (384). > > > > The db_purger normally deletes wu 7 days after was validated and all results > reported or passed deadline, but due to the database currently overworked > everything goes slower than normal. > Ok, but 12 days after this post, the WU is already in my list and my list is 491 length !!! I think there is a problem with this WU. |
Ingleside Send message Joined: 4 Feb 03 Posts: 1546 Credit: 15,832,022 RAC: 13 |
> > Ok, but 12 days after this post, the WU is already in my list and my list is > 491 length !!! > I think there is a problem with this WU. > > This wu have already errored-out, and it looks like the db_purger doesn't purge these wu any longer... As for having so large total wu-count at the moment, AFAIK they haven't started running the db_purger after changing db-server. This probably to make sure everything is working as it should before removing any "done" wu. |
Dugonin Send message Joined: 26 Nov 04 Posts: 8 Credit: 20,932,901 RAC: 0 |
> > > > Ok, but 12 days after this post, the WU is already in my list and my list > is > > 491 length !!! > > I think there is a problem with this WU. > > > > > > This wu have already errored-out, and it looks like the db_purger doesn't > purge these wu any longer... > As for having so large total wu-count at the moment, AFAIK they haven't > started running the db_purger after changing db-server. This probably to make > sure everything is working as it should before removing any "done" wu. > Thank you very much for your answers and your patience. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.